journal article·2023-01-02

Experimental investigation on paver blocks of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete containing silica fume

Rishabh Bajpai, Vedant Soni, Anshuman Shrivastava, Dipankar Ghosh

Publisher page

Abstract

Utilisation of geopolymer may reduce the global warming potential of concrete.. This study examines geopolymer concrete as interlocking paver blocks. Three concretes are compared: conventional cement, fly ash-geopolymer and fly ash–silica fume geopolymer. Sodium hydroxide solution is used in both geopolymer concretes, and sodium silicate solution is used in fly ash-based geopolymer concrete only. Rectangle and uni shape blocks are tested for compressive strength, flexural strength, abrasion resistance and freeze–thaw resistance. Dynamic drop loading test is conducted on block pavement with herringbone laying pattern . Results revealed that resistance to abrasion and water absorption of geopolymeris improved by adding silica fume . Freeze–thaw resistance is the lowest for cement concrete paver blocks. Lowest deflection occurred in block pavement of uni shape. Geopolymer concrete provides uniform load distribution than cement concrete. Cement concrete is slightly costlier than geopolymer concrete. This study concluded the geopolymer as suitable option for paver block applications. .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.05610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.056 ↗
2. 10.5194/essd-10-195-201810.5194/essd-10-195-2018 ↗
3. ASTM C1240 · 2015
4. ASTM C618-17a · 2017
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12014710.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120147 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000103010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001030 ↗
7. CPWD India. (2019). Central public works department, Government of India: Analysis of rates for Delhi 2019.
8. 10.1007/BF0191219310.1007/BF01912193 ↗
9. Davidovits J. · 2015
10. 10.1016/j.jascer.2014.08.00310.1016/j.jascer.2014.08.003 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000117210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001172 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.19110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.191 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.02310.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.023 ↗
14. Hardjito D. · ACI Materials Journal · 2004
15. 10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e0032210.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00322 ↗
16. 10.35940/ijitee.G5996.088101910.35940/ijitee.G5996.0881019 ↗
17. IRC:SP:63. (2004). Guidelines for the use of interlocking concrete block pavement.
18. IS 1237. (2012). Cement concrete flooring tiles – specification.
19. IS:15388. (2003). Silica fume – specification. Bureau of Indian Standards.
20. IS 15658. (2006). Precast concrete blocks for paving — specification.
21. IS:269. (2015). Ordinary Portland cement – specification. Bureau of Indian Standards.
22. IS 3812 (Part 1). (2013). Pulverized fuel ash — specification, Part 1 for use as pozzolana in cement, cement mortar and concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards.
23. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.16410.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.164 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.07110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.071 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000211310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002113 ↗
26. Mane R. · International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) · 2019 · 6 · 102
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.13610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.136 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.010 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:5(318)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:5(318) ↗
30. 10.1007/s12613-019-1764-210.1007/s12613-019-1764-2 ↗
31. Olivia M. · Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences · 2011
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:2(130)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:2(130) ↗
33. Provis J. L. · Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions · 2014 · 47 · 11
34. Provis J. L. · Cement and Concrete Research · 2016
35. 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i5/8725610.17485/ijst/2016/v9i5/87256 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.07210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.072 ↗
37. Shackel, B. & Lim, D. O. O. (2003). Mechanism of block interlock. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Concrete Block Paving. 12–15 October, 2003.
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.03610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036 ↗
39. 10.1080/14680629.2012.67680610.1080/14680629.2012.676806 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.00810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.008 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.002 ↗
42. 10.1088/1757-899X/431/9/09200210.1088/1757-899X/431/9/092002 ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000115710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001157 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 ↗
45. U.S. Geological Survey · 2018
46. Vaz A. D. · 2012 · 173
47. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.00810.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.008 ↗
48. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969035810.1080/14680629.2011.9690358 ↗