Evaluation and Performance of Hydrated Lime and Limestone Powder in Porous Asphalt
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Porous asphalt mixture or Open Graded Friction Course (OGFC) has many benefits that resulted in its extensive use and development. OGFC improves the friction of a wet pavement, surface reflection, traffic noise, wet weather driving conditions by allowing the water to drain through its porous structure and reduces the hydroplaning, the splashing and spraying of water in the air (acts as spray reducing surfaces). For achieving the advantages mentioned above, this mixture must have big Voids in Total Mix (VTM). The big VTM reduces durability of the paving mixtures and prone them to raveling. The use of hydrated lime in porous asphalt is an accepted practice for many highway agencies in order to increase mixture strength as well as to improve durability of asphalt pavements. The goal of this study is to evaluate the mechanical properties of lime treated OGFC before and after multiple cycles of freeze-thaw moisture conditioning and also to show that hydrated lime improves stability and durability of the mixture more than limestone powder.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. FIRL · 1972 · 5
2. GDT, Georgia Department of Transportation. June 1989.GDT-114. “Method of Test for Determining Optimum Asphalt Content for Open Graded Bituminous Paving Mixtures”June, 9–23.
3. GDT, Georgia Department of Transportation. 1999.“Georgia Department of Transportation Progress in Open Graded Friction Course Development”1–27.
4. GDT, Georgia Department of Transportation. June 1988a.GDT-66. “Method of Test for Evaluation the Moisture Susceptibility of Bituminous Mixtures by Diametric Tensile Splitting”June, 34–47.
5. GDT. June 1988b.“Test Method for Heat Stable Anti-Strip Additive Georgia Department of Transportation”June, 17–29.
6. Kandhal P. S. · 1998 · 2
7. Kandhal P. S. · 1999 · 10
8. Kandhal P. S. · 1998 · 1
9. Kentucky Method.Method for Designing Open Graded Friction Course Mixtures64–424. 00.1–10
10. Lanka S. · 1997 · 31
11. Lefebvre G. · 1993 · 41
12. Mallick R. B. · Proc. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2000 · 69 · 391
13. New Jersey Department of Transportation. March 2005.Modified Open Graded Friction Course (MOGFC)March, 1–17.
14. 1998.Surface Asphalt185–218. Nicholls
15. Piarc Pub. 1993.Porous Asphalt26–43.
16. Sabita Ltd · 1995 · 31
17. Smith , H. A. 1992.“Performance Characteristics of Open Graded Friction Courses. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 180, TRB”13–21.
18. Smith R. W. · 1974 · 8
19. The Asphalt Institute · 1996
20. Van Heystraeten G. · 1990 · 8
21. Watson D. E. · 1988 · 30
22. Watson , D. E. Moore , K. A. Williams , K. and Cooley , L. A. Jr. August 2002.National Center for Asphalt Technology, “Refinement of New Generation Open Graded Friction Course Mix design”August, 1–10.10.3141/1832-10 ↗