journal article·2019-04-30

New approach for characterising the performance of asphalt binders through the multiple stress creep and recovery test

Fernando Moreno-Navarro, Raúl Tauste, Miguel Sol-Sánchez, M. Carmen Rubio-Gámez

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 20· Issue sup1
Publisher page

Abstract

The Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery (MSCR) test is widely used to analyse the mechanical performance of asphalt binders. It has commonly been used to analyse resistance to permanent deformations and identify and quantify how the polymer is working in the binder. However, this test also offers other useful information that can be studied to provide a better understanding of the mechanical performance of asphalt binders. This paper presents a new approach that analyses binder performance in terms of mechanical loads, thermal gradients, ageing and low temperatures, based on the results obtained from the MSCR test. For this purpose, several parameters and indexes are defined to characterise the response of asphalt binders. To evaluate the potential of this new approach, a research study was carried out with ten different binders (neat and modified) and three types of bituminous mixtures. The indexes obtained from binder performance show a strong correlation with the performance of bituminous binders against the main distresses that appear in road pavements, thus providing an efficient tool for selecting the most appropriate asphalt binder to use under certain traffic and climatic conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Construction Engineering (LabIC.UGR), School of Civil Engineering (ETSICCP), University of Granada, Granada, Spain

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. AASTHO M 332 · 2018
2. AASTHO T350 · 2018
3. Alavi M. Z. · 2016 · 13 · 12710.1007/978-94-024-0867-6_18 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1997)9:3(117)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1997)9:3(117) ↗
5. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969023610.1080/14680629.2009.9690236 ↗
6. 10.3141/2126-0910.3141/2126-09 ↗
7. D’Angelo J. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologist · 2007 · 76 · 123
8. EN 12593 · 2007
9. EN 12607-1 · 2014
10. EN 12697-17 · 2006
11. EN 12697-22 · 2008
12. EN 12697-25 · 2006
13. EN 13108-2 · 2007
14. EN 13589 · 2008
15. EN 1426 · 2007
16. EN 1427 · 2007
17. EN 14769 · 2012
18. EN 16659 · 2016
19. Harrigan E. T. · 1994
20. Kok B. V. · International Journal of Science & Technology · 2007 · 2 · 41
21. 10.1016/j.cis.2008.08.01110.1016/j.cis.2008.08.011 ↗
22. Maccarrone S. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1995 · 64 · 209
23. Mogawer W. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2015 · 84 · 705
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.02410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.024 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.00410.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.12610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.126 ↗
27. 10.1080/10298436.2015.105713810.1080/10298436.2015.1057138 ↗
28. 10.3141/2505-0510.3141/2505-05 ↗
29. Roberts F. L. · 1996
30. 10.3141/1875-0810.3141/1875-08 ↗
31. Stuart K. D. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1997 · 66 · 109
32. Tsai B.-W. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2005 · 74 · 733
33. 10.1080/10298436.2011.57355710.1080/10298436.2011.573557 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000062510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000625 ↗