journal article·2019-07-04Open access

Effect of geogrid reinforcement on the flexural behaviour of concrete pavements

Abbas S. A. Al-Hedad, Muhammad N. S. Hadi

Abstract

This paper presents results of an investigation of the effect of geogrid reinforcement on the flexural behaviour of concrete pavements. Six concrete slab specimens having dimensions of 900 × 900 × 60 mm were prepared and tested. Three of the specimens were unreinforced and taken as references. The other three were reinforced with a triaxial geogrid layer located at 40 mm from the top of the specimen. To support the specimens during the testing, two layers of recycled rubber having a side dimension of 900 mm and a 60 mm total thickness were used. According to the location of the applied load, the specimens were divided into three groups. Each group included two specimens (unreinforced and reinforced specimen). The specimens of the first group were tested by applying a load at the corner of the specimen. For the second group, the specimens were tested by applying a load at the edge of the specimen. The load was applied at the interior of the specimens for the third group. The monotonic test load was applied at a rate of 0.25 mm/min. Study parameters investigated in this study included the ductility, fracture energy and formation of cracks of the specimens. Test results obtained indicate that the flexural performance and cracking resistance of the concrete slab specimens reinforced with the geogrid can be improved.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of CME Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.037 ↗
2. 10.1080/10298436.2015.103113110.1080/10298436.2015.1031131 ↗
3. 10.1080/10298436.2010.54956510.1080/10298436.2010.549565 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000089710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000897 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0004706310.1007/BF00047063 ↗
6. Boscato G. · Concr Repair Rehab Retrofitt · 2009 · 2 · 1285
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.02710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.027 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.03010.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.030 ↗
9. 10.1080/14680629.2008.969012710.1080/14680629.2008.9690127 ↗
10. Huang Y. H. · 2004
11. 10.1007/s12205-016-0577-310.1007/s12205-016-0577-3 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:2(177)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:2(177) ↗
13. Maxwell, S., Kim, W., Edil, T. B. & Benson, C. H. (2005). Effectiveness of geosynthetics in stabilizing soft subgrades (Final Rep. No. 0092-45-15). Madison, WI: Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000092010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000920 ↗
15. Rajeshkumar K. · International Journal of Applied Engineering Research · 2010 · 1 · 15
16. 10.1111/str.1219110.1111/str.12191 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.043 ↗
18. 10.1080/14680629.2006.969004010.1080/14680629.2006.9690040 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.05910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.059 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.021 ↗
21. Siva Chidambaram R. · Indian Concrete Journal · 2015 · 89 · 83
22. 10.1080/14680629.2008.969012410.3166/RMPD.910.1080/14680629.2008.969012410.3166/RMPD.9 ↗
23. Sorelli L. G. · ACI Materials Journal · 2006 · 103 · 551
24. 10.1080/1029843080227982710.1080/10298430802279827 ↗
25. 10.1617/s11527-015-0761-910.1617/s11527-015-0761-9 ↗
26. 10.1680/macr.14.0011610.1680/macr.14.00116 ↗
27. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126677510.1080/14680629.2016.1266775 ↗