journal article·2019-05-19

The influence of stone crushing processes on aggregate shape properties

Lara Marques Diógenes, Iuri Sidney Bessa, Verônica Teixeira Franco Castelo Branco, Enad Mahmoud

Publisher page

Abstract

Aggregate shape properties have a direct influence on the behaviour of pavement materials. The crushing process is the main factor responsible for generating these shape properties; however, there has hardly been any effort directed toward optimising the performance of pavement materials by altering the crushing techniques to produce aggregate particles with desired shape properties. The aim of this research is to analyse how the crushing process influences aggregate shape properties. Form, angularity and surface texture of five coarse and five fine aggregates, from three different quarries, were evaluated by means of digital image processing and were categorised by two different classification systems. The jaw crusher produced coarse aggregates with a better combination of sphericity and angularity during the first crushing stage. Fine aggregates produced by cone crushers in the final crushing stages were more elongated, but had a greater angularity than fine aggregates produced by the primary jaw crusher.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Transportation Engineering, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil

Department of Transportation Engineering, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX, USA

Funding

CNPq · Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development · Sindibrita · Brazilian National Department of Mineral Production

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.005 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.minpro.2005.12.00210.1016/j.minpro.2005.12.002 ↗
3. Bern R. · Areia e Brita · 1997 · 1 · 13
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.05110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.051 ↗
5. 10.1016/s0892-6875(97)00145-310.1016/s0892-6875(97)00145-3 ↗
6. Chaves A. · 2012 · 3
7. 10.11175/easts.6.106210.11175/easts.6.1062 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.12010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.120 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.minpro.2006.08.00410.1016/j.minpro.2006.08.004 ↗
10. 10.1111/1467-8667.0031510.1111/1467-8667.00315 ↗
11. 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(1998)10:3(135)10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(1998)10:3(135) ↗
12. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000003310.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000033 ↗
13. Masad, E. (2004). Aggregate imaging system (AIMS): basics and applications (Report n° FHWA/TX-05/5-1707-01-1). College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute. Retrieved from http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/5-1707-01-1.pdf
14. 10.3166/rmpd.8.317-35010.3166/rmpd.8.317-350 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.01.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2005.01.010 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.05810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.058 ↗
17. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000187410.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001874 ↗
18. 10.3141/1787-1310.3141/1787-13 ↗
19. 10.1080/14680629.2011.65008810.1080/14680629.2011.650088 ↗
20. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000038610.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000386 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.004 ↗
22. Tutumluer, E., Rao, C. & Stefanski, J. A. (2000). Video image analysis of aggregates (Report No. FHWA-IL-UI-278). Urbana, IL: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
23. 10.1155/2016/626431710.1155/2016/6264317 ↗
24. 10.3141/2104-0110.3141/2104-01 ↗
25. 10.1080/14680629.2013.79437010.1080/14680629.2013.794370 ↗