Fundamental evaluation of moisture damage in warm-mix asphalts
Source abstract
Abstract
Warm-mix asphalt (WMA) technologies have been used extensively in the last decade. The benefits of WMA have motivated stakeholders to expedite the implementation of this technology. However, some research studies have raised concerns regarding WMA laboratory performance in terms of resistance to moisture damage, while WMA has demonstrated good performance in the field. These experiences led to further research to understand the fundamental characteristics of WMA. This study conducted a comprehensive evaluation of WMA prepared using different aggregate sources, asphalt binders, and WMA additives. A dynamic mechanical analyser was used to test the mastic phase of conventional hot-mix asphalt and WMA. The test specimens were evaluated at different conditions – dry and wet – and at different ageing stages – unaged and three-month aged – in a controlled environmental room (i.e. 60°C). A fracture mechanics approach was used to analyse the test results. This approach incorporated fundamental material properties, including adhesive bond energy between aggregates and asphalt binder. The results show that WMA performance improved with ageing and the overall performance of the WMA can be improved if the selection of materials (i.e. aggregate source, asphalt binder, WMA technology) is optimised based on the compatibility of their surface energy. In addition, surface energy results were able to explain some findings from the mechanical testing related to moisture susceptibility of WMA.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
Funding
Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF)
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3141/2295-0610.3141/2295-06 ↗
2. 10.3141/2208-1310.3141/2208-13 ↗
3. 10.3141/1998-0410.3141/1998-04 ↗
4. 10.3141/1970-0310.3141/1970-03 ↗
5. 10.17226/1448810.17226/14488 ↗
6. Bower N. · 2012
7. Buss A. · 2011
8. Button J. W. · 2007
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.03510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.035 ↗
10. Chowdhury A. · 2008
11. D’Angelo J. · 2008
12. Doyle J. D. · Asphalt Paving Technology · 2011 · 80 · 419
13. Epps Martin A. · 2013
14. 10.17226/2242910.17226/22429 ↗
15. Estakhri C. · 2012
16. Estakhri C. · 2010
17. Garcia Cucalon L. · 2014 · 69110.1201/b17219-87 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000138310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001383 ↗
19. 10.1061/41167(398)7310.1061/41167(398)73 ↗
20. Gong W. · Transportation Research Record · 2012 · 1417 · 38
21. Harvey J. · Transportation Research Record · 1993 · 1417 · 38
22. 10.1061/41005(329)1610.1061/41005(329)16 ↗
23. Hurley G. C. · Asphalt Paving Technology · 2006 · 75 · 41
24. Kassem E. · 2015
25. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969525810.1080/14680629.2011.9695258 ↗
26. 10.3141/1891-0710.3141/1891-07 ↗
27. Little D. N. · 2006
28. Lytton R. · 2006
29. Lytton R. · 1993
30. 10.1080/1029843070155121910.1080/10298430701551219 ↗
31. Mogawer W. S. · Asphalt Paving Technology · 2011 · 80 · 491
32. 10.3141/2293-0310.3141/2293-03 ↗
33. 10.1115/1.365690010.1115/1.3656900 ↗
34. 10.3141/1998-1210.3141/1998-12 ↗
35. Prowell B. D. · 2011
36. 10.1007/BF0114083710.1007/BF01140837 ↗
37. Solaimanian M. · 2011
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.038 ↗
39. 10.3141/2051-1010.3141/2051-10 ↗
40. Yin F. · Asphalt Paving Technology · 2013 · 82 · 177
41. Yin F. · Asphalt Paving Technology · 2014 · 83 · 109