Evaluation of dynamic modulus of typical asphalt mixtures in Northeast US Region
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper is based on the experimental results from the New England Transportation Consortium project titled “Establishing Default Dynamic Modulus Values for New England”. The dynamic modulus (|E*|) test results for 20 different dense-graded hot mix asphalt mixtures from five states in the Northeast US Region were compared with predicted |E*| values from Andrei-Witczak and Hirsch models as well as ENTPE transformation. The factors influencing measured |E*| values and prediction errors were also evaluated. The results showed that binder grade, air voids, and presence of reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) significantly affect |E*| values of asphalt mixtures. Statistical analysis of |E*| predictions revealed a similar level of underestimation produced by the three models over the high temperatures)>40°C). However, at medium and low temperatures (<25°C) the ENTPE transformation clearly outperforms two other models by yielding on average very small errors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2004.AASHTO TP, 62-03Washington, DC: AASHTO. standard method of test for determining modulus of hot mix asphalt concrete mixtures
2. Al-Qadi I. · 2009
3. Andrei D. · 1999
4. Bari J. · Journal of Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists · 2006 · 75 · 381
5. Bari J. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2005 · 1929 · 1010.3141/1929-02 ↗
6. Bennert, T. 2009. “Dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt (Final Report FHWA-NJ-2009-011)”. Trenton, New Jersey: New Jersey Department of Transportation.
7. Birgisson B. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2005 · 1929 · 20010.3141/1929-24 ↗
8. Bonaquist R. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2005 · 1929 · 20810.3141/1929-25 ↗
9. Bonaquist R. · 1998
10. Bonaquist R. F. · 2003
11. Christensen D. W. · Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2003 · 72 · 97
12. Daniel J. S. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2005 · 1929 · 2810.3141/1929-04 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968999210.1080/14680629.2004.9689992 ↗
14. Dongré R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2005 · 74 · 381
15. Fonseca O. A. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1996 · 65 · 532
16. Gordon G. V. · 1994
17. Hirsch T. J. · 1961
18. Kim Y. · ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2007 · 19 · 100010.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:11(1000) ↗
19. Marasteanu M. O. · 1999
20. Masad E. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2002 · 71 · 535
21. NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) · 2004
22. Olard F. · International Journal of Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2003 · 4 · 185
23. Pellinen T. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2007 · 76 · 575
24. Robinette C. · International Journal of Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2010 · 11 · 55910.1080/14680629.2010.9690294 ↗
25. Rowe G. M. · 2008
26. 10.3141/2127-1910.3141/2127-19 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:10(874)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:10(874) ↗
28. Shook J. F. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1969 · 38 · 140
29. The Math Works Inc., MATLAB R2009b.
30. Vavrik W. R. · 2008
31. Witczak M. W. · 2005