journal article·2019-04-03

Stiffness and strength properties of spent coffee grounds-recycled glass geopolymers

Arul Arulrajah, Teck-Ang Kua, Cherdsak Suksiripattanapong, Suksun Horpibulsuk

Publisher page

Abstract

Spent coffee ground (CG) geopolymers are novel cementitious materials, which utilise industrial wastes such as fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag as precursors. Several past studies have investigated the strength development of these recycled products, and established their suitability as road subgrade construction materials. This paper evaluates the incorporation of recycled glass (RG) into the CG geopolymer blend to further enhance the strength of the mix, as well as investigates the resilient modulus (MR) properties of CG+RG. Repeat Load Triaxial (RLT) tests were undertaken to investigate the flexibility and deformation pattern of CG+RG geopolymer subgrades under repeated traffic loading. The relationship between RG replacement ratio and material stiffness was furthermore established. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests on the CG+RG geopolymers indicate that the CBR value of these materials exceeds those of naturally occurring subgrade materials. The CBR and MR values of the CG+RG geopolymers are essential design parameters for the usage of this novel construction material in subgrades.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

Center of Excellence in Innovation for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, School of Civil Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

Funding

Thailand Research Fund

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO, T307-99 · 2007
2. ABC · 2006
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000149610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001496 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.15010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.150 ↗
5. ASTM, D1557-12 · 2012
6. ASTM, D1883-14 · 2014
7. ASTM, D2216-98 · 2006
8. ASTM, D6913-04 · 2009
9. 10.1080/14680629.2016.119714310.1080/14680629.2016.1197143 ↗
10. 10.1680/jmacr.16.0027910.1680/jmacr.16.00279 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000150810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001508 ↗
12. 10.1080/1040839090358641210.1080/10408390903586412 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2016.119488410.1080/14680629.2016.1194884 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.16410.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.164 ↗
15. 10.1080/19648189.2016.124669510.1080/19648189.2016.1246695 ↗
16. 10.1080/14680629.2015.110822110.1080/14680629.2015.1108221 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.02.01210.1016/j.sandf.2016.02.012 ↗
18. 10.1139/cgj-2013-017710.1139/cgj-2013-0177 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.07210.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.072 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.02.00210.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.02.002 ↗
21. 10.1080/14680629.2015.106446610.1080/14680629.2015.1064466 ↗
22. Jin W. · ACI Materials Journal · 2000 · 97 · 208
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.09710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.097 ↗
24. 10.1080/14680629.2015.108346310.1080/14680629.2015.1083463 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.021 ↗
26. Kua T.-A. · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · 2016 · 1
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.08210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.082 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2015.110377810.1080/14680629.2015.1103778 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000062510.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000625 ↗
30. 10.1680/jadcr.14.0002510.1680/jadcr.14.00025 ↗
31. Meyer C. · 2001 · 1
32. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.010 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.03910.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.039 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.08710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.087 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.010 ↗
36. 10.3141/2059-0610.3141/2059-06 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.006 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.08510.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.085 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.045 ↗
40. 10.1080/14680629.2015.111905610.1080/14680629.2015.1119056 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.004 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.10.01810.1016/j.enggeo.2012.10.018 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tust.2013.01.00310.1016/j.tust.2013.01.003 ↗
44. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000093210.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000932 ↗
45. 10.1080/14680629.2015.106670310.1080/14680629.2015.1066703 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.10310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.103 ↗
47. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239) ↗
48. 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.00510.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.005 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.00610.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.006 ↗
51. VicRoads · 2013
52. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.09.00710.1016/j.enggeo.2013.09.007 ↗
53. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77930910.1080/14680629.2013.779309 ↗
54. 10.1080/1064119X.2016.125809510.1080/1064119X.2016.1258095 ↗
55. Wang D. · Marine Georesources & Geotechnology · 2017 · 1
56. 10.1139/cgj-2012-019910.1139/cgj-2012-0199 ↗
57. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(526)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(526) ↗
58. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.06.01510.1016/j.enggeo.2015.06.015 ↗
59. 10.1080/14680629.2016.120648310.1080/14680629.2016.1206483 ↗
60. 10.1080/14680629.2015.112068310.1080/14680629.2015.1120683 ↗