Performance characteristics of asphalt mixtures with industrial waste/by-product materials as mineral fillers under static and cyclic loading
Source abstract
Abstract
The mineral filler is an integral constituent of asphalt mixture, which affects its performance. This research investigates the effect of using four local industrial waste/by-product materials (marble, granite, steel slag and hydrated lime powder) as mineral fillers on asphalt mixtures characteristics. The detailed performance of these materials as well as asphalt binder and asphalt mixture characteristics are presented. In Egypt, limestone powder is a typical mineral filler in asphalt mixture composition. A control asphalt mixture with limestone mineral filler is designed using Marshall method. Other four asphalt mixtures are prepared using similar constituents and volumetrics except replacing the limestone filler with other types of industrial waste/by-product materials, while maintaining the same percentage of mineral filler as in the control mix. Marshall stability and moisture-induced damage of the investigated asphalt mixtures are determined and compared to the control asphalt mixture results. In addition, the performance characteristics of the investigated mixtures are evaluated by conducting cyclic performance tests including the dynamic modulus (E*) and flow number (FN). Testing results show that the asphalt mixture containing marble as a filler yields the highest stability; while, the hydrated lime filler noticeably enhances the performance of the asphalt mixture in terms of moisture damage resistance, E*, and FN. Unexpectedly, steel slag filler does not improve the asphalt mixture performance. Finally, the stiffness of the investigated mixtures is evaluated using three well-known E*-predictive models (NCHRP 1-37A, Hirsh, and NCHRP 1-40D); while, the resistance of the investigated mixtures to permanent deformation is evaluated using a calibrated version of Apeagyei-literary model based on the investigated mixtures to predict FN at 54.4°C and 1 Hz frequency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Highway and Airport Engineering Laboratory, Public Works Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Civil Engineering Department, Nile Institute for Engineering and Technology, Mansoura, Egypt
Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Jouf University, Sakaka, KSA
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed H. · Assiut University · 2006 · 9
2. 10.1080/14680629.2018.146545110.1080/14680629.2018.1465451 ↗
3. AASHTO R 62 · 2013
4. AASHTO R 83 · 2017
5. AASHTO T 11 · 2005
6. AASHTO T 84 · 2013
7. AASHTO T 89 · 2013
8. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO T 90) · 2016
9. AASHTO T 165 · 2002
10. AASHTO T 245 · 2015
11. AASHTO T 283 · 2014
12. AASHTO T 342 · 2011
13. AASHTO T 378 · 2017
14. Andrei, D., Witczak, M. & Mirza, M. (1999). Development of a revised predictive model for the dynamic (complex) modulus of asphalt mixtures. Development of the 2002 Guide for the Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, NCHRP 1-37A.
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000030910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000309 ↗
16. 10.1080/14680629.2016.118934910.1080/14680629.2016.1189349 ↗
17. ARA, ERES Consultants Div. (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures (NCHRP 1-37A Final Rep.). National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:11(610)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:11(610) ↗
19. Awed, A. (2010). Material characterization of HMA for MEPDG implementation in Idaho [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Idaho.
20. Awed A. · 2011
21. 10.1177/036119810519290010210.1177/0361198105192900102 ↗
22. 10.1177/036119810519290012410.1177/0361198105192900124 ↗
23. Bonaquist R. F. · 2011
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:6(286)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:6(286) ↗
25. 10.1080/14680629.2006.969005910.1080/14680629.2006.9690059 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000073010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000730 ↗
27. Christensen D. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2003 · 72 · 97
28. Dougan, C., Stephens, J., Mahoney, J. & Hansen, G. (2003). |E*|-dynamic modulus test protocol-problems and solutions (Publication CT-SPR-0003084-F03-3). Connecticut Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration.
29. ECPURR · 2008
30. 10.1007/s41062-018-0129-410.1007/s41062-018-0129-4 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000228210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002282 ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000051810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000518 ↗
33. El-Badawy S. · 2018
34. 10.12691/ajcea-2-3-210.12691/ajcea-2-3-2 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000019110.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000191 ↗
36. 10.1107/S002188980001088810.1107/S0021889800010888 ↗
37. Hossain K. · International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering (IJCEE-IJENS) · 2011 · 11 · 47
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.17810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.178 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.04210.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.042 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.066 ↗
41. 10.1051/matecconf/20171200700310.1051/matecconf/201712007003 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.56710.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.567 ↗
43. Kofteci S. · International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering · 2014 · 1 · 117
44. 10.1080/14680629.2016.119714510.1080/14680629.2016.1197145 ↗
45. 10.1080/14680629.2012.74366910.1080/14680629.2012.743669 ↗
46. 10.1177/036119810619700011410.1177/0361198106197000114 ↗
47. National Solid Waste Management Program (NSWMP). (2011). National solid waste management program (Main report).
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.037 ↗
49. Pellinen T. · 2001
50. 10.1080/14680629.2018.147529710.1080/14680629.2018.1475297 ↗
51. Satyakumar M. · International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology · 2013 · 4 · 99
52. 10.1016/j.cscm.2014.04.00510.1016/j.cscm.2014.04.005 ↗
53. Shah A. · International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) · 2015 · 2 · 1204
54. Sushma K. · Journal of Civil Engineering Technology and Research · 2014 · 2 · 577
55. 10.1007/s41062-018-0188-610.1007/s41062-018-0188-6 ↗
56. 10.3141/2208-0510.3141/2208-05 ↗
57. Witczak, M. (2005). Use of the dynamic modulus (E*) test as a simple performance test for asphalt pavement systems (AC permanent deformation distress) (Volume I of IV Preliminary Draft Final Report, NCHRP Project 9-19: Superpave Support and Performance Models Management). Arizona State University.
58. Witczak, M., El-Basyouny, M. & El-Badawy, S. (2007). Incorporation of the new (2005) E_ predictive model in the MEPDG (NCHRP 1-40D Inter-Team Technical Rep). Arizona State University.
59. Witczak, M., Kaloush, K., Pellinen, T., El-Basyouny, M. & Quintus, H. (2002). Simple performance test for superpave mix design (NCHRP Report 465). National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
60. Witczak, M. & Sullivan, B. (2002). Superpave support and performance models management (NCHRP Rep. 547). National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
61. Yousefdoost S. · 2013
62. Yu, J. (2012). Modification of dynamic modulus predictive models for asphalt mixtures containing recycled asphalt Shingles [MSc Thesis]. Iowa State University.
63. Zahid H. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2013 · 41 · 1
64. 10.1080/14680629.2016.121878910.1080/14680629.2016.1218789 ↗
65. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000039510.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000395 ↗