Influence of fly ash, ground-granulated blast furnace slag and lime on unconfined compressive strength of black cotton soil
Source abstract
Abstract
Utilisation of industrial waste products with black cotton soil (BCS) in the improvement of its engineering properties has gained attention to the sustainability of the natural resources and cost efficiency. This paper evaluates the influence of fly ash, ground-granulated blast furnace slag and lime at 12%, 8% and 1–9%, respectively, on BCS obtained from the N4 road North West Province, South Africa, to improve the soil. The performance of the modified BCS cured for 7, 28, 60 and 90 days was evaluated using compaction, California bearing ratio (CBR) and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test according to standard specifications. The CBR value increases with increase in the level of compaction. The influence of the waste materials added for different compaction levels and curing periods improved the CBR and UCS values significantly. UCS of the stabilised BCS meets with the specification for sub-base material at 97% and 100% compaction for all the curing periods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical and construction materials studies · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Amiralian S. · International Journal of Biological, Ecological and Environmental Sciences (IJBEES) · 2012 · 1 · 124
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.08.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.08.001 ↗
3. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77929910.1080/14680629.2013.779299 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.clay.2010.11.02810.1016/j.clay.2010.11.028 ↗
5. Gyanen T. · International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology · 2013 · 2 · 477
6. Hakari U. D. · Global Journal of Researches in Engineering (E) · 2012 · 12 · 1
7. 10.1007/s12665-011-1441-x10.1007/s12665-011-1441-x ↗
8. 10.1007/s11707-011-0166-110.1007/s11707-011-0166-1 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0956-053X(96)00083-910.1016/S0956-053X(96)00083-9 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.04210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.042 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12665-011-1419-810.1007/s12665-011-1419-8 ↗
12. 10.7763/IJET.2012.V4.32610.7763/IJET.2012.V4.326 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00150-110.1016/S0043-1354(02)00150-1 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10706-013-9632-810.1007/s10706-013-9632-8 ↗
15. Noorina T. · International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Reserach · 2013 · 4 · 456
16. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.62-64.310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.62-64.3 ↗
17. 10.1680/grim.2005.9.1.3310.1680/grim.2005.9.1.33 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.04.00410.1016/j.resconrec.2004.04.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2003.11.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2003.11.003 ↗
20. Sabat A. K. · International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering & Development · 2012 · 2 · 42
21. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.08.00510.1016/j.resconrec.2005.08.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0956-053X(96)00061-X10.1016/S0956-053X(96)00061-X ↗
23. 10.1080/14680629.2012.75593510.1080/14680629.2012.755935 ↗
24. Yadu L. · IJERT · 2013 · 2 · 115