journal article·2015-05-25

Advanced shear tester for evaluation of asphalt concrete under constant normal stiffness conditions

Adam Zofka, Maciej Maliszewski, Alexander Bernier, Ramandeep Josen, Audrius Vaitkus, Rita Kleizienė

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 16· Issue sup1
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents motivation and details on the development of an advanced shear tester (AST) device capable of investigating the response of 150-mm cylindrical specimens under constant normal stiffness (CNS) conditions. Based on the laboratory experience and field observations from the soil and rock engineering, CNS conditions are particularly desirable when the normal stress changes considerably during the shearing process. Such situations occur in asphalt pavement structures especially under certain loading configurations. The CNS conditions are complementary to the constant normal load conditions that are applied in the current shear-mode devices incorporated in testing of asphalt concrete (AC) and pavement interface properties. This paper demonstrates the complex state of stress in the upper AC layer of a typical pavement under moving truck wheel and shows the need for the CNS device. In addition to outlining unique AST design features, this paper presents also the verification effort conducted on the solid Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene specimens. The AST results matched very well the reference data that were obtained under the elastic regime in the stress-controlled mode from the unconfined uniaxial compression and indirect tension tests. Finally, this paper demonstrates the example results collected on the solid AC specimens prepared with two different nominal maximum aggregate sizes. The analysis confirmed the ability of the AST device to capture both practical and fundamental phenomena occurring during the shearing process in the AC. It is believed that AST-type devices that are rather simple in design yet allow to induce complex state of stress in the AC specimens should be more recognised in the future research efforts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Road and Bridge Research Institute, ul. Instytutowa 1, 03–302, Warszawa, Poland

Stantec Consulting, 261 Fifth Ave. 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA

Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc., 5 Burlington Woods Dr, Burlington, MA 01803, USA

Road Research Institute, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Linkmenu g. 28, 08217, Vilnius, Lithuania

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. Al-Qadi I. L. Carpenter S. H. Leng Z. Ozer H. & Trepanier J. S. (2008). Tack coat optimization for HMA overlays: Laboratory testing ICT-R55 (Final Report No. FHWA-ICT-08-023). Urbana IL: Illinois Center for Transportation.
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.03110.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.031 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00514-810.1016/S0142-9612(02)00514-8 ↗
4. Brown, S. F., & Brunton, J. M. (1984). The influence of bonding between bituminous layers. The Journal of the Institution of Highways and Transportation, 31, 16–17.
5. Buchanan W. S. & Woods M. E. (2004). Field tack coat evaluator (Report No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-04-168). Jackson MS: Mississippi Transportation Research Center.
6. Burmister, D. M. (1943). The theory of stresses and displacements in layered systems and applications to the design of airport runways. Proceedings of Highway Research Board, 23, 126–144.
7. Buttlar, W. G., Wagoner, M., You, Z., & Brovold, T. S. (2004). Simplifying the hollow cylinder tensile test procedure through volume-based strain. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 73, 367–400.
8. Canestrari F. Ferrotti G. Lu X. Millien A. Partl M. N. Petit C. … Raab C. (2013). Mechanical testing of interlayer bonding in asphalt pavements (Chapter 6). In M. N. Partl H. U. Bahia F. Canestrari C. de la Roche H. Di Benedetto H. Piber & D. Sybilski (Eds.) Advances in interlaboratory testing and evaluation of bituminous materials RILEM State-of-the-Art Report (pp. 303–360). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5104-0_6 ↗
9. 10.3141/1929-0910.3141/1929-09 ↗
10. Chowdhury A. & Button J. (2002). Evaluation of superpave shear test protocols (report FHWA/TX-02/1819-1) (Vol. 7). Austin TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
11. Christensen Jr, D. W., Bonaquist, R. F., & Handojo, T. (2002). Field shear test device for quality control testing of asphalt concrete. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 71, 386–416.
12. Christensen D. W. Bonaquist R. & Jack D. P. (2000). Evaluation of triaxial strength as a simple test for asphalt concrete rut resistance (Final Report). University Park PA: Pennsylvania State University.
13. 10.3141/1630-0510.3141/1630-05 ↗
14. 10.1680/geot.2011.61.1.510.1680/geot.2011.61.1.5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.017 ↗
16. Crispino M. Festa B. Giannattasio P. & Nicolosi V. (1997 August 10–14). Evaluation of the interaction between the asphalt concrete layers by a new dynamic test. Proceeding of the 8th international conference on asphalt pavements Seattle USA (pp. 741–754).
17. 10.5539/mas.v7n10p110.5539/mas.v7n10p1 ↗
18. De Bondt A. H. (1999). Anti-reflective cracking design of (reinforced) asphalt overlays (PhD thesis). Delft University of Technology The Netherlands.
19. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199805)40:2<214::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199805)40:2<214::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
20. 10.1080/14680629.2006.969003310.1080/14680629.2006.9690033 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:7(1317)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:7(1317) ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:2(172)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:2(172) ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:12(1096)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:12(1096) ↗
24. Fioravante, V., Ghionna, V. N., Sergio, P., & Porcino, D. (1999). A constant normal stiffness direct shear box for soil-solid interface tests. Rivista Italiana Di Geotecnica, 3, 9–22.
25. Goodman R. E. (1976). Methods of geological engineering in discontinuous rocks. St Paul NY: West Publishing Group.
26. 10.1617/1431710.1617/14317 ↗
27. 10.3141/2295-0710.3141/2295-07 ↗
28. Hondros, G. (1959). The evaluation of Poisson's ratio and the modulus of materials of a low tensile resistance by the Brazilian (indirect tensile) test with particular reference to concrete. Australian Journal of Applied Science, 10(3), 243–268.
29. 10.1023/A:100888011292610.1023/A:1008880112926 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00603-014-0556-210.1007/s00603-014-0556-2 ↗
31. 10.3846/enviro.2014.15810.3846/enviro.2014.158 ↗
32. Judycki J. & Jaskuła P. (2013). Investigation and evaluation of the effect of interlayer bonding on the service life of asphalt pavements (Report for Polish National Highway Agency (GDDKiA)). Warsaw: Polish Highway Road Administration.
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000000310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000003 ↗
34. Kruntcheva, M. R., Collop, A. C., & Thom, N. H. (2005). Effect of bond condition on flexible pavement performance. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 131(11), 880–889.
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:3(467)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:3(467) ↗
36. Leutner, R. (1979). Untersuchung des Schichtenverbundes beim bituminösen Oberbau. Bitumen, 41(3), 84–91.
37. 10.3141/2181-0110.3141/2181-01 ↗
38. 10.3141/2210-0910.3141/2210-09 ↗
39. Lobach T. (2014 June 1–5). Effects of different bonding systems on the mechanical properties of laboratory compacted two-layer asphalt systems. Proceedings of 2014 international society for asphalt pavements (ISAP) conference Raleigh.
40. 10.1016/0377-2217(84)90282-010.1016/0377-2217(84)90282-0 ↗
41. 10.3141/2293-1010.3141/2293-10 ↗
42. Miró Recasens R. Pérez Jiménez F. & Borrás González J. M. (2003 April 14–16). Evaluation of the effect of tack coats. LCB shear test. Sixth international RILEM symposium on performance testing and evaluation of bituminous materials PTEBM '03 Zurich Switzerland (pp. 550–556).10.1617/2912143772.069 ↗
43. 10.3141/2180-1110.3141/2180-11 ↗
44. Mohammad, L. N., Bae, A., Elseifi, M. A., Button, J., & Scherocman, J. A. (2009). Interface shear strength characteristics of emulsified tack coats. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 78, 249–279.
45. 10.3141/2209-0110.3141/2209-01 ↗
46. Monismith C. L. Hicks R. G. Finn F. N. Sousa J. Harvey J. Weissman S. L. & Paulsen G. (1994). SHRP-A-415: Permanent deformation response of asphalt aggregate mixes. Washington DC: Strategic Highway Research Program National Research Council.
47. Muench S. T. & Moomaw T. (2008). De-Bonding of hot mix asphalt pavements in Washington state: An initial investigation (Report WA-RD 712.1). Seattle Washington DC: Washington State Department of Transportation.
48. 10.3141/1853-1710.3141/1853-17 ↗
49. 10.1520/GTJ10132J10.1520/GTJ10132J ↗
50. 10.1080/14680629.2006.969006010.1080/14680629.2006.9690060 ↗
51. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2010)22:2(124)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2010)22:2(124) ↗
52. 10.3141/2057-0710.3141/2057-07 ↗
53. 10.3166/rmpd.10.609-62410.3166/rmpd.10.609-624 ↗
54. Raab C. & Partl M. N. (2004 September 12–16). Effect of tack coats on interlayer shear bond of pavements. 8th conference on asphalt pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA'04) Sun City North West Province South Africa.
55. Raab C. & Partl M. N. (2009 October 15–16). Influence of the gap width between the shearing rings on interlayer shear bond testing. Proceedings of ENVIROAD 2009 (p. 8) Warsaw Poland.
56. 10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.186-19510.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.186-195 ↗
57. 10.3141/1778-1610.3141/1778-16 ↗
58. 10.3141/1778-1510.3141/1778-15 ↗
59. 10.3141/1630-0910.3141/1630-09 ↗
60. 10.3141/2372-0710.3141/2372-07 ↗
61. 10.1617/s11527-008-9414-610.1617/s11527-008-9414-6 ↗
62. Shahin M. Y. Blackmon E. W. Van Dam T. & Kirchner K. (1987). Consequence of layer separation on pavement performance (Technical Report DOT/FAA/PM-86/48). Springfield: Federal Aviation Administration.
63. Sholar G. A. Page G. C. Musselman J. A. Upshaw P. B. & Moseley H. L. (2004). Bond strength of bituminous tack coats. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists 73 771–806.
64. 10.1617/1431510.1617/14315 ↗
65. 10.1080/14680629.2007.969006910.1080/14680629.2007.9690069 ↗
66. Stupkiewicz, S., & Mróz, Z. (2001). Modelling of friction and dilatancy effects at brittle interfaces for monotonic and cyclic loading. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 39(3), 707–739.
67. Sutanto M. H. Collop A. C. Airey G. D. & Elliott R. C. (2008 May 21–23). The effects of simulated trafficking on bond between asphalt layers. Proceedings of 4th Eurasphalt & eurobitume congress Copenhagen Denmark.
68. Uzan, J., Livneh, M., & Eshed, Y. (1978). Investigation of adhesion properties between asphaltic-concrete layers. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 47, 495–521.
69. Vacin O. Ponniah J. & Tighe S. (2005 August 6). Quantifying the shear strength at the asphalt interface. AISIM symposium Waterloo.
70. Vaitkus, A., Cygas, D., Laurinavicius, A., Vorobjovas, V., & Kleiziene, R. (2012). Research of asphalt layer bonding in Lithuanian pavement structures. Građevinar, 11, 915–920.
71. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969526410.1080/14680629.2011.9695264 ↗
72. 10.3141/2154-0810.3141/2154-08 ↗
73. Wellner F. (2007). Untersuchungen zur Wirksamkeit des Haftverbundes und dessen Auswirkungen auf die Lebensdauer von Asphaltbefestigungen (Report) (p. 59). Dresden: Technische Universität Dresden.
74. West R. C. Zhang J. & Moore J. (2005). Evaluation of bond strength between pavement layers (NCAT Report 05-08). Auburn: National Center for Asphalt Technology.
75. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:6(596)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:6(596) ↗
76. Zofka A. Bernier A. Josen R. & Maliszewski M. (2014 June 1–5). Advanced shear tester for solid and layered samples. Proceedings of 2014 international society for asphalt pavements (ISAP) conference Raleigh.
77. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969034010.1080/14680629.2010.9690340 ↗