journal article·2019-04-30

Investigation on the combined effect of aging temperatures and cooling medium on rheological properties of asphalt binder based on DSR and BBR

Di Wang, Augusto Cannone Falchetto, Chiara Riccardi, Lily Poulikakos, Bernhard Hofko, Laurent Porot, Michael P. Wistuba, Hassan Baaj, Peter Mikhailenko, Ki Hoon Moon

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 20· Issue sup1
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, the combined effect of aging temperatures and cooling medium on the rheological properties of asphalt binder was experimentally investigated and evaluated. Two 70/100 penetration grade binders, which were part of the core materials used by the active RILEM committee CMB-252, were selected for this purpose. The materials were artificially aged to six different conditions, first with the Rolling Thin Film Oven Test (RTFOT) at three different temperatures (123°C, 143°C, and 163°C), and then, with the standard Pressure Aging Vessel (PAV). Next, temperature and frequency sweep (T-f-sweep) tests were performed on the entire set of materials by using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) from −30°C to 80°C while low-temperature creep tests were conducted on the long-term aged asphalt binders with the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR) devices in air and in ethanol, respectively. Then, the 2 Spring 2 Parabolic element 1 Dashpot model (2S2P1D) and Huet model were used to evaluate the rheological properties of asphalt binders based on the DSR and BBR results, respectively. Moreover, two parameters, crossover temperature, Tδ=45°, and the difference in critical temperature, ΔTc, were used to evaluate the aging properties of the materials. Finally, the relationship between the time domain complex modulus based on DSR and the creep stiffness obtained with the BBR was established to investigate the effect of the cooling medium at low-temperatures. The results indicate that a temperature reduced process may lead to a mitigation of the short-term aging of asphalt binders, while a temperature reduction of only 40°C can result in a consistently milder long-term aging. In the BBR test, higher creep stiffness and smaller m-values can be observed in the air compared to ethanol. Huet and 2S2P1D models show that complex modulus and creep stiffness share the same core parameters only in the case of air. Based on the finding in this research, the temperature reduced mixing process and the use of air for BBR creep tests are recommended.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering - Braunschweig Pavement Engineering Centre (ISBS), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan

Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland

Institute of Transportation, Technische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

Kraton Chemical B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

Korea Expressway Corporation, Pavement Research Division, Hwaseong-si, South Korea

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO M320 · 2016
2. AASHTO R35-15 · 2015
3. AASHTO T313 · 2012
4. AASHTO T314 · 2012
5. AASHTO T315 · 2012
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000161710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001617 ↗
7. Anderson D. A. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologies · 1993 · 62 · 481
8. ASTM D6373-16 · 2016
9. 10.17226/1448810.17226/14488 ↗
10. Cannone Falchetto A. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2011 · 80 · 549
11. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102970810.1080/14680629.2015.1029708 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2012.73579310.1080/14680629.2012.735793 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102969610.1080/14680629.2015.1029696 ↗
14. Chowdhury A. · 2008
15. Christensen R. M. · 1982
16. Christensen D. W. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1992 · 61 · 67
17. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968999210.1080/14680629.2004.9689992 ↗
18. EN 12591 · 2015
19. EN 12607-1 · 2014
20. EN 1426 · 2015
21. EN 1427 · 2015
22. EN 14769 · 2012
23. Farrar M. · 2015
24. 10.1080/1029843080234272410.1080/10298430802342724 ↗
25. 10.1080/1029843090303333910.1080/10298430903033339 ↗
26. 10.1080/14680629.2019.158815210.1080/14680629.2019.1588152 ↗
27. 10.3141/2180-1010.3141/2180-10 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2017.130426810.1080/14680629.2017.1304268 ↗
29. 10.1080/14680629.2016.114170310.1080/14680629.2016.1141703 ↗
30. Hurley G. C. · National Center for Asphalt Technology-NCAT Report · 2005 · 5 · 1
31. Hurley G. C. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2006 · 75 · 41
32. 10.1680/coma.2008.161.1.110.1680/coma.2008.161.1.1 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000047910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000479 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.16010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.160 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.01010.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.010 ↗
36. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77475110.1080/14680629.2013.774751 ↗
37. Marasteanu M. O. · 1999 · 133
38. 10.1080/14680629.2003.968994610.1080/14680629.2003.9689946 ↗
39. Poulikakos L. D. · 2018
40. 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.410.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.4 ↗
41. Prowell B. D. · 2011
42. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138907210.1080/14680629.2017.1389072 ↗
43. Sharma B. K. · 2017
44. 10.3141/2179-0310.3141/2179-03 ↗
45. Wang D. · 2018
46. 10.1021/ja01619a00810.1021/ja01619a008 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.038 ↗
48. Zeng M. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2001 · 70 · 403