Mechanical and compaction properties of graphite nanoplatelet-modified asphalt binders and mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the properties of asphalt binders and mixtures modified with graphite nanoplatelets (GNPs). The focus is on studying the effects of GNP addition on low-temperature rheological and fracture properties of asphalt binders and mixtures and on compaction effort of asphalt mixtures. This is the first time that these effects are investigated and significant findings are reported. The study considers three types of GNP materials, including graphite nanoplatelets and sub-microscale graphite flakes. The cost of these materials is reasonably low, which makes them suitable for large-scale applications, unlike other types of graphite and graphene materials. The experimental results indicate that the addition of GNPs leads to considerable improvements of low-temperature strength and fracture properties of asphalt binders and mixtures. While the properties of asphalt binders at intermediate temperatures are minimally affected, for some combinations of binders and GNPs the increase in low-temperature strength is over 100%. A similar effect is observed for some of the asphalt mixtures investigated, in which the low-temperature fracture energy almost doubles. The laboratory compaction experiments show that the number of gyrations required for achieving a target density can be reduced by as much as 20–40% by adding a small percentage of GNPs into asphalt binders. The results of this experimental study indicate that GNP-modified asphalt binders and mixtures have significant potential for increasing the durability of asphalt pavements in cold regions, by reducing the compaction effort and improving the low-temperature strength and fracture properties of asphalt materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.013 ↗
2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2007a). AASHTO T322-07, Standard Method of Test for Determining the Creep Compliance and Strength of Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using the Indirect Tensile Test Device.
3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2007b). AASHTO TP105-2013 Standard Method of Test for Determining the Fracture Energy of Asphalt Mixtures Using the Semicircular Bend Geometry (SCB).
4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2010a). AASHTO T166-10-UL, Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using Saturated Surface-Dry Specimen.
5. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2010b). AASHTO T209-10-UL, Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA).
6. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2012). AASHTO R028-12-UL Standard Practice for Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV).
7. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2013). AASHTO T240-13-UL Test for Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt (Rolling Thin-film Oven Test).
8. Amirkhanian A. N. · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · 2010 · 4 · 281
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.03510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.035 ↗
10. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126172410.1080/14680629.2016.1261724 ↗
11. Bažant Z. P. · ACI Materials Journal · 1991 · 88 · 325
12. Bažant Z. P. · 1998
13. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.12.00310.1016/j.mattod.2013.12.003 ↗
14. Determining the flexural creep stiffness of asphalt binder using the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR). (2010). [Computer software manual].
15. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.00710.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.007 ↗
17. 10.1007/978-3-319-17088-6_4910.1007/978-3-319-17088-6_49 ↗
18. 10.1617/s11527-013-0052-210.1617/s11527-013-0052-2 ↗
19. 10.1080/14680629.2017.132366110.1080/14680629.2017.1323661 ↗
20. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102085010.1080/14680629.2015.1020850 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.02710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.027 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.02.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2010.02.015 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.07.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2013.07.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.005 ↗
25. Marasteanu, M. O., Zofka, A., Turos, M., Li, X., Velasquez, R., Li, X. … McGraw, J. (2007). Investigation of low temperature cracking in asphalt pavements: National Pooled Fund Study 776 (Tech. Rep.). St Paul: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
26. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.03.01210.1016/j.pnsc.2014.03.012 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0247291710.1007/BF02472917 ↗
28. Shirakawa T. · International Journal of GEOMATE · 2012 · 2 · 161
29. 10.1007/978-3-642-16657-0_210.1007/978-3-642-16657-0_2 ↗
30. van de Ven, M. F. C., Molenaar, A. A. A., Besamusca, J. & Noordergraaf, J. (2008). Nanotechnology for binders of asphalt mixtures. Proceedings of the 4th Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress. Brussels, Belgium.
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.12910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.129 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.14410.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.144 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000069010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000690 ↗
34. 10.1155/2016/264525010.1155/2016/2645250 ↗
35. 10.1002/pen.2080210.1002/pen.20802 ↗
36. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65706410.1080/14680629.2012.657064 ↗