Influence of Air Voids on Mechanical Properties of Asphalt Mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Air voids play an important role in influencing the performance of asphalt mixtures. This study utilized several mechanical tests to characterize the influence of air void distributions on mechanical properties and response of asphalt mixtures. The overlay tester, Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Test (HWTT), and a repeated tensile test were used to characterize the resistance to fatigue cracking, permanent deformation, and moisture damage, respectively. The overlay test results showed that specimens with more uniform air void distribution had less variability in terms of resistance to fatigue cracking compared with specimens with less uniform air void distribution. Consequently, recommendations were made to improve air void distribution and reduce the test variability. The HWTT results were found to be insensitive to the air void distribution. The repeated tensile test was used to measure material properties that were required inputs to a fracture-based model for the analysis of moisture damage. The repeated tensile test and model results showed that the detrimental effect of moisture was the highest for specimens with the highest percent of air voids. In addition to the characterization of mechanical properties, this study evaluated the effect of temperature distribution in Superpave Gyratory Compacted (SGC) specimens on air void distribution. It was possible to make some minor changes to the compaction procedure in order to improve the uniformity of temperature distribution and, consequently, enhance the uniformity of air void distribution.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) · 2002
2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) · 2007
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:8(655)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:8(655) ↗
4. 10.1520/STP32504S10.1520/STP32504S ↗
5. Consuegra , A. Little , D. N. Quintus , H. V. and Burati , J. 1989.“Comparative Evaluation of Laboratory Compaction Devices Based on Their Ability to Produce Mixtures with Engineering Properties Similar to Those Produced in the Field”, 80–87. Washington, D.C.: TRB, National Research Council.Transportation Research Record 1228
6. Harrigan E. T. · 2002
7. Harris J. P. · 2005
8. Harvey , J. and Monismith , C. L. 1993.Effects of Laboratory Asphalt Concrete Specimen Preparation Variables on Fatigue and Permanent Deformation Test Results Using Strategic Highway Research Program A-003A Proposed Testing Equipment, 38–57. Washington, D.C.: TRB, National Research Council.Transportation Research Record 1417
9. Harvey , J. S. Monismith , C. L. and Eriksen , K. T. 1994.“Effect of Laboratory Compaction Method on Test Results Using SHRP A-0003 Type Equipment”, 291–306. Linköping, Sweden: Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, VTI. SE-581 95, Report Number: VTI 1A, Part 3
10. Howson J. · 2007
11. Kassem E. A. · 2008
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:6(408)10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:6(408) ↗
13. Kassem E. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, AAPT · 2008 · 77 · 257
14. 10.1080/1029843080252479210.1080/10298430802524792 ↗
15. Linden , R. N. Mahoney , J. P. and Jackson , N. C. 1988.“Effect of Compaction on Asphalt Concrete Performance,”20–28. Washington, D.C.Transportation Research Record 1217
16. Lytton R. L. · 1993
17. Masad , E. A. Muhunthan , B. Shashidhar , N. and Harman , T. 1999.“Quantifying Laboratory Compaction Effects on the Internal Structure of Asphalt Concrete”, 179–184. Washington, D.C.: TRB.Transportation Research Record 168110.3141/1681-21 ↗
18. Masad E. · Materials Evaluation · 2004 · 62 · 775
19. Masad E. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2005 · 34 · 1
20. Masad E. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2006 · 75 · 713
21. Monismith , C. L. 1992.“Analytically Based Asphalt Pavement Design and Rehabilitation”, 5–26. Washington, D.C.: TRB, National Research Council.Transportation Research Record 1354
22. Roque , R. Dominguez , G. and Romero , P. 1995.“Effect of Asphalt Mixture Characteristics and Design on Frictional Resistance of Bituminous Wearing Course Mixtures”39–50. Washington, D.C.Transportation Research Record 1507
23. Si Z. · 2001
24. Tashman L. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2001 · 70 · 605
25. Terrel R. L. · 1994
26. Zhou F. · 2003