Evaluating the effect of asphalt binder modification using nanomaterials on the moisture damage of hot mix asphalt
Source abstract
Abstract
One of the most common damages in asphalt mixtures is due to the destructive effects of moisture on the cohesion of asphalt binder and adhesion of asphalt binder–aggregate which is called moisture damage. There are several different approaches for improving adhesion and reducing moisture sensitivity in asphalt mixtures. One convenient approach is modifying the asphalt binder with a suitable agent. In this research, the effects of two types of nanomaterials in two different percentages (nano AL2O3 and Fe2O3), two types of aggregates (granite and quartzite), and one base asphalt binder were evaluated. To assess the effect of nanomaterials, the tensile strength ratio (in 1, 3, and 5 freeze–thaw cycles) and surface free energy (SFE) tests have been used. Mechanical test results used in this study show that using nanomaterials significantly improves the moisture strength of samples made with the modified asphalt binder in comparison with the control samples. Results of SFE theory show that the nanomaterials increase the cohesion free energy of the asphalt binder that decreases the probability of the occurrence of cohesion failure in the mastic. Also, nanomaterials decrease the acid component and increase the base component of SFE of the asphalt binder which increase its adhesion with the aggregates used in this study with acid properties. Measurement results of debonding energy of the asphalt binder–aggregate in wet conditions show that asphalt binder modification with nanomaterials decreases the absolute value of the debonding energy and, therefore, the moisture damage susceptibility decreased.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Guilan, P.O. Box 3756, Rasht, Iran
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Akbari A. · Road Materials and Pavement Design
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.08910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.089 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000022810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000228 ↗
5. 10.1080/10298436.2013.77841010.1080/10298436.2013.778410 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000045510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000455 ↗
7. ASTM. (1998). Test method for resistance of plastic flow of bituminous mixtures using Marshall apparatus. Vol. D1559. America.
8. ASTM. (2003). Gradation specification for dense asphalt mixtures (D3513). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
9. Bhasin A. · 2006
10. 10.3141/2001-0510.3141/2001-05 ↗
11. Cheng D. · 2002
12. Cheng D. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2002 · 71 · 59
13. Duncan, B. (2005). Techniques for characterising the wetting, coating and spreading of adhesives on surfaces. National Physical Laboratory.
14. 10.1021/j100808a52410.1021/j100808a524 ↗
15. 10.1061/9780784479216.00210.1061/9780784479216.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.019 ↗
17. Hamedi G. H. · Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2014 · 16 · 1
18. Hamedi G. H. · Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2015 · 17 · 1
19. Hamedi G. H. · Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2015 · 17 · 1
20. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102085010.1080/14680629.2015.1020850 ↗
21. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102085010.1080/14680629.2015.1020850 ↗
22. 10.1617/s11527-015-0566-x10.1617/s11527-015-0566-x ↗
23. Hefer A. W. · 2004
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:6(759)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:6(759) ↗
25. Hosseinia, S. & Nikoub, M. K. (2012). Synthesis and characterization of nano-sized γ-Al2O3 catalyst for production of dimethyl ether via indirect method work, 251:0.820.
26. 10.4236/ojce.2015.5404210.4236/ojce.2015.54042 ↗
27. Ishai, I. & Craus, J. (1977). Effect of the filler on aggregate-bitumen adhesion properties in bituminous mixtures. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc.
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000081910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000819 ↗
29. Kim S.-H. · Journal of Civil Engineering · 2003 · 7 · 381
30. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2073-710.1007/978-1-4899-2073-7 ↗
31. Little D. N. · 2001
32. Martin, J., Cooley Jr. L. A. & Hainin, H. R. (2003). Production and construction issues for moisture sensitivity of hot-mix asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Board National Seminar (pp. 209–222). San Diego, California.
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.01.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.01.004 ↗
34. Petersen, J. C. (2009). A review of the fundamentals of asphalt oxidation: Chemical, physicochemical, physical property, and durability relationships (Report No. E-C140). Washington, DC: Transportation Research e-Circular.
35. Rice, J. (1958). Relationship of aggregate characteristics to the effect of water on bituminous paving mixtures, ASTM STP 240:17-33.10.1520/STP39327S ↗
36. Scott, J. (1978). Adhesion and disbonding mechanisms of asphalt used in highway construction and maintenance. Association of asphalt paving technologists proceedings.
37. 10.3141/1998-0810.3141/1998-08 ↗
38. Solaimanian, M., Bonaquist, R. F. & Tandon, V. (2007). Improved conditioning and testing procedures for HMA moisture susceptibility, Vol. 589. Transportation Research Board.
39. Souliman M. I. · Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2014 · 27 · 244
40. Tohme P. · International Journal of Pavements · 2004 · 3 · 50
41. 10.1021/cr00088a00610.1021/cr00088a006 ↗
42. Woodward, R. P. (2000). Prediction of adhesion and wetting from Lewis acid base measurements (As presented at TPOs in automotive 2000). Retrieved from http://www.firsttenangstroms.com/pdfdocs/TPOsinAutomotive2000.pdfhttp://www.firsttenangstroms.com/pdfdocs/TPOsinAutomotive2000.pdf.
43. 10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60435-510.1016/S1003-6326(08)60435-5 ↗