journal article·2015-07-03

Unconfined compressive strength and freeze–thaw resistance of fine-grained soil stabilised with bottom ash, lime and superplasticiser

Hamza Güllü

Publisher page

Abstract

Non-traditional soil stabilisers for stabilising marginal soils could be a viable and alternative solution to traditional stabilisers in terms of cost prohibitive as well as enhancement of engineering characteristics. In this preliminary attempt of the study, an applicability of the superplasticiser, which is quite common in concrete production but not so in soil stabilisation, has been investigated for stabilisation of a fine-grained soil (low-plasticity clay) compared with the combinations of traditional stabilisers of bottom ash and lime, as an alternative non-traditional soil stabiliser. An extensive experimental programme including unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests has been conducted for this aim. Based on the testing results, the engineering characteristics (i) the stress–strain curves, (ii) failure modes of specimens, (iii) UCS, (iv) elasticity modulus (Es) and (v) energy absorption capacity (Ed) [Consoli, N. C., Montardo, J. P., Prietto, P. D. M., & Pasa, G. S. (2002). Engineering behavior of a sand reinforced with plastic waste. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128(6), 462–472] of stabilised clay with superplasticiser, bottom ash and lime have been figured out for pre- and post-freezing and thawing conditions, with the discussion in detail. The results indicate that the superplasticisers separately or in combination with bottom ash and lime produce satisfactory engineering characteristics for stabilisation of clay for pre- and post-freezing and thawing conditions. The influences in the stabiliser combinations are statistically significant for the entire results of UCS (p-value < .05), which is moderately correlated with the Es and Ed. On the basis of the UCS values due to the requirements of the standard guide, the compositions including superplasticiser, lime, lime+superplasticiser, lime+bottom ash for non-freeze–thaw, lime+superplasticiser for freeze–thaw are found to effectively improve the native clay. The understanding from the findings with the discussions through the study is relatively promising for the use of superplasticiser in the soil stabilisation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO M-145-91. (2008). Classification of soil and soil–aggregate mixtures for highway construction purposes.
2. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81735010.1080/14680629.2013.817350 ↗
3. Ajayi-Majebi, A., Grissom, W. A., Smith, L. S. & Jones, E. E. (1991).Epoxy-resin-based chemical stabilization of a fine, poorly graded soil system(pp. 95–108). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Transportation Research Record, 1295.
4. 10.1080/14680629.2008.969014310.1080/14680629.2008.9690143 ↗
5. Arellano, D. & Thompson, M. (1998).Stabilized base properties (strength, modulus, fatigue) for mechanistic-based airport pavement design(Final report). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 95-C-001.
6. ASTM D 1557-07.Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort. West Conshohocken, PA, United States.
7. ASTM D 2166-06.Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. West Conshohocken, PA, United States.
8. ASTM D 4609.Standard guide for evaluating effectiveness of admixtures for soil stabilization. West Conshohocken, PA, United States.
9. ASTM D 560-2003.Standard test methods for freezing and thawing compacted soil–cement mixtures. West Conshohocken, PA, United States.
10. Bowles J. E. · 1996
11. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77929910.1080/14680629.2013.779299 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:6(462)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:6(462) ↗
13. Daniels, J. L. & Janardhanam, R. (2007). Cold-weather subgrade stabilization.Proceedings of Geo-Denver 2007, New peaks in geotechnics. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication 172.10.1061/40916(235)8 ↗
14. 10.1080/14680629.2007.969009710.1080/14680629.2007.9690097 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.12.00510.1016/j.coldregions.2009.12.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.04.00110.1016/j.coldregions.2010.04.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.06.00810.1016/j.coldregions.2014.06.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.05.00610.1016/j.coldregions.2010.05.006 ↗
19. Holtz R. D. · 2011
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.10310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.103 ↗
21. Jones, C. W. (1987).Long term changes in the properties of soil linings for canal seepage control(Report No. REC-ERC-87-1). Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Engineering and Research Center.
22. Jullien A. · Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2010 · 11 · 203
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:7(574)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:7(574) ↗
24. Katz, L. E., Rauch, A. F., Liljestrand, H. M., Harmon, J. S., Shaw, K. S. & Albers, H. (2001).Mechanisms of soil stabilization with liquid ionic stabilizer(pp. 50–57). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Transportation Research Record 1757.
25. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969525310.1080/14680629.2011.9695253 ↗
26. 10.1016/0165-232X(89)90029-310.1016/0165-232X(89)90029-3 ↗
27. Kugler H. · Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2005 · 6 · 119
28. 10.1520/GTJ10364J10.1520/GTJ10364J ↗
29. 10.1139/t95-05910.1139/t95-059 ↗
30. Malhotra V. M. · 1989 · 1
31. Mielenz R. · Concrete International: Design and Construction · 1984 · 6 · 40
32. Newman, K. & Tingle, J. S. (2004). Emulsion polymers for soil stabilization.Proceedings of the 2004 FAA worldwide airport technology transfer conference, FAA Atlantic City, NJ.
33. Petry, T. M. & Das, B. (2001).Evaluation of chemical modifiers/stabilizers for chemically active soils – clays(pp. 43–49). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Transportation Research Record 1757.
34. Phillips, M., Puppala, A. J. & Melton, K. (2003).Development of stabilizer selection tables for low-volume roads(pp. 85–94). Arlington, TX: Transportation Research Board, Paper No. LVR8-1088, Transportation Research Record 1819.
35. Press W. H. · 2001
36. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.05.01010.1016/j.coldregions.2007.05.010 ↗
37. Ramachandran V. S. · 1995
38. Rauch, A. F., Harmon, J. S., Katz, L. E. & Liljestrand, H. M. (2002).Measured effects of liquid soil stabilizers on engineering properties of clay(pp. 33–41). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Transportation Research Record 1787.
39. Rauch, A. F., Katz, L. E. & Liljestrand, H. M. (2003).An analysis of the mechanisms and efficacy of three liquid chemical soil stabilizers(Vol. 1). University of Texas at Austin, Center for Transportation research, Report No. 1993-1, FHWA/TX-03/1993-1.
40. 10.3850/GI02510.3850/GI025 ↗
41. Rogers, C. D. F. & Glendining, S. (2000).Lime requirement for stabilization(pp. 9–18). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record 1721.
42. Santoni, R. S., Tingle, J. S. & Nieves, M. (2005).Accelerated strength improvement of silty sand with nontraditional additives(pp. 34–42). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record 1936.
43. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77930310.1080/14680629.2013.779303 ↗
44. Scholen, D. E. (1992).Nonstandard stabilizers(Report FHWA-FLP-92-011). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, July, 113 pp.
45. Scholen, D. E. (1995). Stabilizer mechanisms in nonstandard stabilizers. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on low-volume roads(Vol. 2, pp. 252–260). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
46. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:8(509)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:8(509) ↗
47. Sheng D. · Journal of Nordic Hydrology · 1995 · 26 · 12510.2166/nh.1995.0008 ↗
48. Shimadzu. (2014).Analytical and measuring instruments. Retrieved December 20, 2014, from http://www.shimadzu.com/an/test/universal/ags-x/ags-x.html
49. 10.1016/S0165-232X(99)00020-810.1016/S0165-232X(99)00020-8 ↗
50. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B. & Mesri, G. (1996).Soil mechanics in engineering practice(3rd ed., 592 pp.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
51. Tingle, J. S. & Santoni, R. L. (2003). Stabilization of clay soils with non-traditional additives.The eighth international conference on low-volume roads(Vol. 2, pp. 72–84). Transportation Research Board Paper No: LVR8-1136, Transportation Research Record 1819.
52. Tutumluer, E., Santoni, R. L. & Kim, I. T. (2004).Modulus anisotropy and shear stability of geofiber-stabilized sands(pp. 125–135). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Transportation Research Record 1874.
53. 10.1016/S0008-8846(96)00207-410.1016/S0008-8846(96)00207-4 ↗
54. 10.1080/14680629.2012.75593510.1080/14680629.2012.755935 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2006.09.00810.1016/j.coldregions.2006.09.008 ↗
56. 10.1139/t91-09510.1139/t91-095 ↗