Inclusion of aggregate angularity, texture, and form in estimating dynamic modulus of asphalt mixes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The present study was undertaken to develop a model that utilizes aggregate shape parameters (i.e. angularity, texture and form) in estimating the dynamic modulus of asphalt mixes. Dynamic modulus tests were conducted on 20 different mixes comprised of different aggregate sources, sizes, asphalt binder, and air void levels. The coarse and fine aggregates were recovered from each mix, and their shape parameters were measured using an automated aggregate image measurement system (AIMS). A nonlinear regression model was developed to estimate the dynamic modulus of the mix in terms of its aggregate gradation, aggregate shape parameters, viscosity of asphalt binder, and volumetric properties. The correlation coefficient (R 2) for the developed model was found to be 0.95 and 0.92 on logarithmic and arithmetic scales, respectively, with a mean average relative error (MARE) of 21.9%. The performance of this model was compared with the widely accepted Witczak model that does not use the shape parameters of the aggregates. The MARE for the Witczak model was estimated significantly higher than the developed model. Results show that the dynamic modulus of the mix increases with an increase in the angularity and texture of aggregates and that the inclusion of shape parameters can enhance the prediction capability of a model. Keywords: dynamic modulusangularitytextureformasphalt mixaggregate imaging Acknowledgements The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to Haskell Lemon Construction Company, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for their assistance during every phase of this project. The financial support of Volvo Construction Equipment Company, Shippensburg, PA, and the Oklahoma Transportation Center, Oklahoma City, OK, are also greatly appreciated. The authors greatly appreciate the help of Mr Brian Wolfe and Mr Asif Imran during different phases of this project. The authors are sincerely thankful to Mr Joshua Gibson for his assistance in editing this paper.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/1029843050015904010.1080/10298430500159040 ↗
2. Al-Rousan, T., Masad, E., Myers, L. & Speigelman, C. (2005). New methodology for shape classification of aggregates.Transportation Research Record, No. 1913, Washington, DC, 11–23.10.1177/0361198105191300102 ↗
3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2002). T 316 Standard method of test for viscosity determination of asphalt binder using rotational viscometer. Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2006). Standard method of test for determining dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt concrete mixtures: TP62-06. Washington, DC: Author.
5. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM D2493) (2009). Viscosity-temperature chart for asphalt.Annual book of ASTM standards, 0.0403.
6. Andrei, D., Witczak, M.W. & Mirza, M.W. (1999) Development of a revised predictive model for the dynamic (complex) modulus of asphalt mixtures. NCHRP 1-37A Interim Team Report, University of Maryland.
7. Bari J. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technology · 2006 · 75 · 381
8. Bennert, T., Cooley, L.A., Ericson, C. & Zavery, Z. (2011). Evaluation of coarse aggregate angularity properties and its relationship to permanent deformation for New York state gravel aggregates. CD-ROM Publication,Transportation Research Board, Paper No. 11-2904.10.3141/2207-04 ↗
9. Bonaquist, R.F. (2003).Simple performance tester for suparpave mix design. quarterly progress report (Appendix B)(NCRHP Project 9-29). Washington, DC: TRB.
10. 10.1080/1029843080234269010.1080/10298430802342690 ↗
11. Chadbourn, B.A., Skok, E.L., Newcomb, D.E., Crow, B.L. & Spindler, S. (1999). Effect of voids in mineral aggregate on hot-mix asphalt pavements. Report MN/RC-2000-13. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul.
12. Chehab, G.R. (2002). Characterization of asphalt concrete in tension using a visco-elasto-plastic model. PhD dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
13. Cominsky, R.J., Killingsworth, B.M., Anderson, R.M., Anderson, D.A. & Crockford, W.W. 1998. Quality control and acceptance of Superpave designed hot mix asphalt. Project D9-7, NCHRP Report No. 409, Journal of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000006210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000062 ↗
15. 10.1617/s11527-007-9303-410.1617/s11527-007-9303-4 ↗
16. Dongre R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2005 · 74 · 381
17. Far M. S.S. · Transportation Research Record · 2009 · 2127 · 17310.3141/2127-20 ↗
18. Fletcher, T., Chandan, C., Masad, E. & Sivakumar, K. (2003). Aggregate imaging system for characterizing the shape of fine and Coarse aggregates.Transportation Research Record, No. 1832, Washington, DC, pp. 67–77.10.3141/1832-09 ↗
19. Gatchalian, D., Masad, E., Chowdhury, A. & Little, D. (2006). Characterization of aggregate resistance to degradation in stone matrix asphalt mixtures.Transportation Research Record, No. 1962, Washington, DC, pp. 55–63.10.1177/0361198106196200107 ↗
20. Goh S. W. · ASCE, Journal of Transportation Engineering · 2011 · 137 · 3710.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000191 ↗
21. Harran G. · Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2009 · 36 · 18010.1139/L08-123 ↗
22. Kuo C.-Y. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation, JTEVA · 2002 · 30 · 13610.1520/JTE12299J ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000022810.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000228 ↗
24. Loulizi, A., Flintsch, G., Al-Qadi, I. & Mokarem, D. (2006). Comparing resilient modulus and dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt as material properties for flexible pavement design.Journal of Transportation Research Record, No. 1970, Washington, DC, pp. 161–170.10.1177/0361198106197000117 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:11(977)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:11(977) ↗
26. MTS System Corporation (2011). Retrieved from July 12, 2011,http://www.mts.com/
27. 10.1109/34.19246310.1109/34.192463 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2007.969007710.1080/14680629.2007.9690077 ↗
29. Masad, E., Little, D.N., Tashman, L., Saadeh, S., Al-Rousan, T. & Sukhwani, R. (2003). Evaluation of aggregate characteristics affecting HMA concrete performance. Research Report ICAR 203-1, The Aggregate Foundation of Technology, Research, and Education, Arlington, VA.
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:6(477)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:6(477) ↗
31. Masad, E., Olcott, D., White, T. & Tashman, L. (2001b). Correlation of fine aggregate imaging shape indices with asphalt mixture performance.Transportation Research Record, No. 1757, Washington, DC, pp. 148–156.
32. Masad, E.A. (2005). Aggregate Imaging System (AIMS) basics and applications. Report No. FHWA/TX-05/5-1707-01-1. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas.
33. Mohammad L. N. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2008 · 36 · 110.1520/JTE101245 ↗
34. NCHRP. (2004). 1-37 A. Development of the 2002 guide for the design of new and rehabilitated pavement structured. Phase II, TRB, Washington, DC.
35. Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) (2011). Construction engineering standard, specifications, materials and testing. Retrieved from June 30, 2011,http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/cnstrctengr.htm
36. 10.3141/1789-1210.3141/1789-12 ↗
37. 10.3141/1789-0910.3141/1789-09 ↗
38. Schwartz, C. (2005). Evaluation of the Witczak dynamic modulus prediction model. CD-ROM. 84th Annual Meeting, TRB.
39. Shenoy A. · Journal of Transportation Research Record · 2002 · 1789 · 17310.3141/1789-19 ↗
40. Singh D. V. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) · 2011 · 2210 · 5710.3141/2210-07 ↗
41. Witczak M. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies · 2002 · 71 · 671
42. Wu, Y., Parker, F. & Kandhal, P. (1998). Aggregate toughness/ abrasion resistance and durability/soundness tests related to asphalt concrete performance in pavements.Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1638, Washington, DC, pp. 85–93.10.3141/1638-10 ↗
43. You Z. · Material and Structures · 2008 · 59 · 427
44. You, Z. & Buttlar, W.G. (2006). Micromechanical modeling approach to predict compressive dynamic moduli of asphalt mixtures using the distinct element method.Journal of Transportation Research Record, No. 1970, 73–83.10.1177/0361198106197000107 ↗
45. Zeghal M. · Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2008 · 35 · 26810.1139/L07-084 ↗
46. Zhu H. · ASCE, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2011 · 23 · 13110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000145 ↗