An improved ResNet50 model for predicting pavement condition index (PCI) directly from pavement images
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurately predicting the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), a measure of roadway conditions, from pavement images is crucial for infrastructure maintenance. This study proposes an enhanced version of the Residual Network (ResNet50) architecture, integrated with a Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM), to predict PCI directly from pavement images without additional annotations. By incorporating CBAM, the model autonomously prioritises critical features within the images, improving prediction accuracy. Compared to the original baseline ResNet50 and DenseNet161 architectures, the enhanced ResNet50-CBAM model achieved a significantly lower mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 58.16%, compared to the baseline models that achieved 70.76% and 65.48% respectively. These results highlight the potential of using attention mechanisms to refine feature extraction, ultimately enabling more accurate and efficient assessments of pavement conditions. This study emphasises the significance of targeted feature refinement in advancing automated pavement analysis through attention mechanisms.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
North Dakota State University
University of Memphis
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/0361198123119505410.1177/03611981231195054 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jreng.2023.04.00210.1016/j.jreng.2023.04.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12054410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120544 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000051210.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000512 ↗
5. 10.1088/1757-899X/512/1/01203910.1088/1757-899X/512/1/012039 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10462-022-10148-x10.1007/s10462-022-10148-x ↗
7. 10.1080/10298436.2019.163357910.1080/10298436.2019.1633579 ↗
8. Fujita, Y., Shimada, K., Manabu, I., & Hamamoto, Y. (2017). QCAV – A method based on machine learning using hand-crafted features for crack detection from asphalt pavement surface images. SPIE Proceedings (Vol. 10338), SPIE.
9. Guan, S., Liu, H., Pourreza, H. R., & Mahyar, H. (2023). Deep learning approaches in pavement distress identification: A review. ArXiv Preprint, 14(8), 1–22.
10. 10.3390/infrastructures902003410.3390/infrastructures9020034 ↗
11. Hasibuan, R. P., & Surbakti, M. S. (2019). Study of pavement condition index (PCI) relationship with international roughness index (IRI) on flexible pavement. MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 258, p. 03019).
12. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
13. 10.1515/otmcj-2016-000810.1515/otmcj-2016-0008 ↗
14. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.298902810.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989028 ↗
15. 10.1109/ICINIS.2009.9510.1109/ICINIS.2009.95 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11851310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118513 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00521-021-06098-010.1007/s00521-021-06098-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11939710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119397 ↗
19. 10.1080/10298436.2022.214767210.1080/10298436.2022.2147672 ↗
20. 10.3390/app807104110.3390/app8071041 ↗
21. 10.1186/s40537-023-00845-x10.1186/s40537-023-00845-x ↗
22. 10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.000051210.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000512 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jag.2023.10333510.1016/j.jag.2023.103335 ↗
24. 10.1007/s42947-023-00356-110.1007/s42947-023-00356-1 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.12610.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.126 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000045410.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000454 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10419010.1016/j.autcon.2022.104190 ↗
28. 10.1061/jpeodx.000033310.1061/jpeodx.0000333 ↗
29. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.295619110.1109/ACCESS.2019.2956191 ↗
30. 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.000067210.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000672 ↗
31. Yamany M. S. Saeed T. U. & Volovski M. (2019). Performance prediction of interstate flexible pavement across the Midwestern United States: Random-parameter regression vs artificial neural network. … Research Board 98th … November. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohamed-Yamany/publication/328566549_Performance_Prediction_of_Interstate_Flexible_Pavement_Across_the_Midwestern_United_States_Random-Parameter_Regression_vs_Artificial_Neural_Network/links/5dc9f7da299bf1a47b2ffdb2/Pe
32. 10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_5310.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 ↗