Characterisation of bitumen grade and modification using a multilevel multivariate discriminant analysis approach and FTIR spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
The complex nature of bitumen poses significant challenges in its characterisation. This study employed FTIR spectroscopy combined with Partial Least Squares Regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis algorithms (PLSR-LDA) to classify bitumen samples based on chemical composition. The dataset included samples from multiple manufacturers, with varying ageing levels and the incorporation of SBS and wax. The multilevel PLSR-LDA approach effectively differentiated bitumen grades, SBS modification levels and RAP binders by identifying key chemical markers. Unmodified bitumen samples were classified based on C-H bending and stretching in aliphatic compounds, as well as CH2 rocking vibrations. In SBS-modified samples, distinctions were driven by variations in aromatic and aliphatic components linked to SBS and wax. For RAP binders, classification was governed by CH2 rocking vibrations, oxidative ageing markers (sulphoxide, carbonyl) and changes in aliphatic CH2/CH3 structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Kassel
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00053-910.1016/S0924-2244(99)00053-9 ↗
2. 10.3390/met909101710.3390/met9091017 ↗
3. Farrés, M., Platikanov, S., & Tauler, R. (2015). Comparison of the Variable Importance in Prediction (VIP) and of the Selectivity Ratio (SR) variable selection methods in the analysis of three different data sets. Journal of Chemometrics, 76(1), 101–110.
4. 10.1080/14680629.2023.218029710.1080/14680629.2023.2180297 ↗
5. 10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.00110.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.13270110.1016/j.fuel.2024.132701 ↗
8. 10.1002/joc.410310.1002/joc.4103 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10720410.1016/j.measurement.2019.107204 ↗
10. 10.1080/14680629.2023.218100810.1080/14680629.2023.2181008 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma1408205510.3390/ma14082055 ↗
12. 10.1617/s11527-014-0248-010.1617/s11527-014-0248-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12221510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122215 ↗
14. 10.1617/s11527-022-01884-110.1617/s11527-022-01884-1 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11880910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118809 ↗
16. 10.1080/10298436.2024.241892710.1080/10298436.2024.2418927 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13823010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138230 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13718810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137188 ↗
19. Peres, C., & Antão, M. (2017). The use of multivariate discriminant analysis to predict corporate bankruptcy: A review. Aestimatio: The IEB International Journal of Finance, 14, 108–131.
20. 10.3109/0036551750909580110.3109/00365517509095801 ↗
21. 10.1617/s11527-021-01763-110.1617/s11527-021-01763-1 ↗
22. 10.1617/s11527-018-1252-610.1617/s11527-018-1252-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12684510.1016/j.fuel.2022.126845 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-94-017-1026-8_210.1007/978-94-017-1026-8_2 ↗
25. 10.1002/0470845015.cpa01210.1002/0470845015.cpa012 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0191610.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c01916 ↗
27. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.335673110.1109/ACCESS.2024.3356731 ↗
28. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000373010.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003730 ↗