journal article·2024-11

Physics-informed neural networks to advance pavement engineering and management

Nima Kargah-Ostadi, K. Vasylevskyi, A. Ablets, A. Drach

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 25· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINN) are machine learning (ML) algorithms that can bridge the gap between our understanding of physical phenomena and the corresponding empirical observations. This paper discusses applications of physics-integrated ML to advance pavement engineering. To demonstrate an example, a PINN model was pretrained to approximate the simulation of vehicles’ suspension responses to longitudinal road profiles. The parameters of the outer layers were finetuned to adapt model output to the standard International Roughness Index (IRI), while keeping the pretrained inner layers to preserve the embedded physical knowledge of the suspension behaviour. The PINN model showed low bias and standard error in predicting IRI values on training, test, and an independent dataset from an autonomous vehicle study by the Ford Motor Company. This approach to reconcile and supplement infrequent survey data with spatiotemporally continuous data (from connected vehicles) can enhance data-driven practices for pavement design, maintenance and asset management.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Callentis Consulting Group, Austin, TX, USA

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/027836492096145110.1177/0278364920961451 ↗
2. 10.1061/JPEODX.000030510.1061/JPEODX.0000305 ↗
3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2014a). AASHTO M 328 (2014): Standard specification for inertial profiler.
4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2014b). AASHTO R 56 (2014): Standard practice for certification of inertial profiling systems.
5. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2021). AASHTO R 43-13 (2021): Standard practice for quantifying roughness of pavements.
6. American Association of State Highway & Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2018). AASHTO R 57-14 (2018): Standard practice for operating inertial profiling systems.
7. 10.1520/E1926-08R2110.1520/E1926-08R21 ↗
8. 10.1520/E095010.1520/E0950 ↗
9. 10.1887/075030895810.1887/0750308958 ↗
10. 10.48550/arXiv.2107.0119910.48550/arXiv.2107.01199 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.147067010.1115/1.1470670 ↗
12. 10.1504/IJVD.2005.00762310.1504/IJVD.2005.007623 ↗
13. Chen C.-S. Chou C.-P. & Chen A.-C. (2017). Viscoelastic model for estimating the international roughness index by smartphone sensors. In TRB 96th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers.
14. 10.1080/14680629.2023.218808910.1080/14680629.2023.2188089 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.10288210.1016/j.autcon.2019.102882 ↗
16. 10.3390/s2002045110.3390/s20020451 ↗
17. 10.1155/2016/841314610.1155/2016/8413146 ↗
18. Federal Highway Administration. (n.d.). Long-term pavement performance (LTPP). https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2004)10:4(157)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2004)10:4(157) ↗
20. Flintsch G. & Smith B. (2012). Infrastructure pavement assessment & management applications enabled by the connected vehicles environment - Proof of concept.
21. Forslof L. (2012). Roadroid - Smartphone road quality monitoring. In 19th ITS world congress.
22. 10.1109/SAHCN.2015.733835310.1109/SAHCN.2015.7338353 ↗
23. Geyer J. Kassahun Y. Mahmudi M. Ricou X. Durgesh R. Chung A. S. Hauswald L. Pham V. H. Mühlegg M. Dorn S. Fernandez T. Jänicke M. Mirashi S. Savani C. Sturm M. Vorobiov O. Oelker M. Garreis S. & Schuberth P. (2020). A2D2: Audi autonomous driving dataset. http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.06320
24. Haykin, S. (1999). Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
25. 10.1061/JPEODX.000020510.1061/JPEODX.0000205 ↗
26. Huang, Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design. Prentice Hall.
27. 10.17226/2556310.17226/25563 ↗
28. Kargah-Ostadi, N. (2013). Enhancing analytical toolboxes of pavement management systems via integration of computational intelligence. The Pennsylvania State University.
29. Kargah-Ostadi N. Menendez J. R. & Zhou Y. (2018). FHWA-HRT-17-104: Using multi-objective optimization to enhance calibration of performance models in the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.
30. 10.1177/0361198123117440610.1177/03611981231174406 ↗
31. Kingma D. P. & Ba J. L. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In 3rd International conference on learning representations ICLR 2015 - Conference track proceedings (pp. 1–15).
32. 10.1109/JSEN.2020.304262010.1109/JSEN.2020.3042620 ↗
33. 10.1177/0361198121101685210.1177/03611981211016852 ↗
34. 10.1080/10298436.2020.176524110.1080/10298436.2020.1765241 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.trc.2021.10304810.1016/j.trc.2021.103048 ↗
36. 10.1080/10298436.2020.175543410.1080/10298436.2020.1755434 ↗
37. 10.1177/1077546323118330710.1177/10775463231183307 ↗
38. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design for New and rehabilitated pavement structures. Transportation Research Board.
39. 10.1177/036119812092398910.1177/0361198120923989 ↗
40. Perera R. & Elkins G. (2016). LTPP manual for profile measurements and processing (Issue May 2016). US DOT FHWA.
41. 10.1080/14680629.2023.223759710.1080/14680629.2023.2237597 ↗
42. 10.3390/s1811384510.3390/s18113845 ↗
43. Sauerwein P. M. & Smith B. L. (2011). Investigation of the impact of continuous international roughness index (IRI) monitoring on pavement management practice (U. of V. C. for T. Studies (ed.)). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/61063
44. Sayers, M. (1995). On the calculation of international roughness index from longitudinal road profile. Transportation Research Record.
45. Sayers M. W. Gillespie T. D. & Paterson W. D. (1986). Guidelines for conducting and calibrating road roughness measurements. The World Bank 46.
46. Sayers M. W. & Karamihas S. M. (1998). The little book of profiling (Issue September). University of Michigan.
47. 10.5555/2627435.267031310.5555/2627435.2670313 ↗
48. Willard J. Jia X. Xu S. Steinbach M. & Kumar V. (2020). Integrating scientific knowledge with machine learning for engineering and environmental systems. Preprint arXiv:2003.04919 1(1) 1–34. http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04919
49. 10.1080/10298436.2023.218340210.1080/10298436.2023.2183402 ↗
50. 10.15388/SIRWEC.202210.15388/SIRWEC.2022 ↗
51. 10.1109/TSMC.1973.540857510.1109/TSMC.1973.5408575 ↗
52. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000046110.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000461 ↗