Experimental application of waste glass powder filler in recycled dense-graded asphalt mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents laboratory study results, including both bituminous mastics and mixtures tests, to assess the use of glass powder (GP) as possible surrogate to limestone filler in recycled dense-graded asphalt mixtures. To achieve a comprehensive approach, the analysis has been divided into three parts including filler, mastics and mixture characterisation. The GP has been completely studied with chemical and physical tests to compare the fundamental characteristics to the commonly used limestone filler. In the second part, rheological tests using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer has been implemented to evaluate fillers interaction with not modified and modified bitumen. Finally, the mechanical properties of the asphalt mixtures containing GP filler were investigated in terms of indirect tensile strength, indirect tensile stiffness modulus and creep characteristics. According to the obtained results, GP filler provided comparable values to limestone filler within both mastic and mixture study. It is noteworthy that from the permanent deformation analysis, both MSCR and RLAT tests confirmed the improvement of rutting resistance with using GP filler.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
DICAM Department, School of Engineering and Architecture, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.07010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.070 ↗
2. Anderson, D. A., Le Hir, Y. M., Marasteanu, M. O., Planche, J. P., Martin, D. & Gauthier, G. (2001). Evaluation of fatigue criteria for asphalt binders (pp. 48–55). Transportation Research Record 1766. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. doi: 10.3141/1766-0710.3141/1766-07 ↗
3. 10.1080/14680629.2016.118934910.1080/14680629.2016.1189349 ↗
4. D'Angelo J. · Asphalt Paving Technology · 2007 · 76 · 123
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.12210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.122 ↗
6. 10.5829/idosi.ije.2013.26.10a.0810.5829/idosi.ije.2013.26.10a.08 ↗
7. Jony H. H. · Engineering & Technologies Journal · 2011 · 29 · 44
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(102)10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(102) ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.05810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.058 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.05810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.058 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_4810.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_48 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000043610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000436 ↗
13. 10.1080/10298436.2016.117616510.1080/10298436.2016.1176165 ↗
14. Saffar N. A. L. · Al-Rafidain Engineering · 2013 · 21 · 88
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.01610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.016 ↗
16. 10.3390/coatings706007610.3390/coatings7060076 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.05210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.052 ↗
18. 10.17577/IJERTV5IS11011810.17577/IJERTV5IS110118 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma910084210.3390/ma9100842 ↗