journal article·2014-04-03

Behaviour of asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement and asphalt shingle

Nouffou Tapsoba, Cédric Sauzéat, Hervé Di Benedetto, Hassan Baaj, Mohsen Ech

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents the results of laboratory research on asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and asphalt shingle, including the study of their linear viscoelastic (LVE) behaviour and fatigue characteristics. Complex modulus measurements using the tension-compression test on cylindrical specimens were conducted to determine LVE behaviour. Sinusoidal cyclic loadings with a strain amplitude of approximately 50×10−6 were applied at several temperatures (from−30°C to+40°C) and frequencies (from 0.01 to 10 Hz). In addition to axial stresses and strains, radial strains were also measured. The complex modulus E* and complex Poisson's ratio ν* were then obtained and the three-dimensional (3D) LVE behaviour (with isotropy hypothesis) was then completely described. The time–temperature superposition principle was verified with good approximation in uni-dimensional and 3D conditions for the same values of shift factor. Experimental results were modelled using the 2 springs, 2 parabolic creep elements and 1 dashpot model developed at University of Lyon/ENTPE. Fatigue properties were evaluated by tension-compression tests on cylindrical specimens using the same testing device used for complex modulus. Sinusoidal loading at 10 Hz in controlled axial strain mode was applied at 10°C. The variation of complex modulus E* and complex Poisson's ratio ν* as a function of the number of cycles was obtained. The fatigue test results were analysed using six different fatigue life criteria. The analysis of the results provided a ranking of the tested materials. The influence of RAP and asphalt shingle contents was quantified.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Lyon/ENTPE, LGCB & LTDS (UMR CNRS 5513), Rue Maurice Audin, 69518, Vaulx-en-Velin, France

Lafarge Research Center, 95 rue du Montmurier, 38291 Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Al-Qadi, I. L., Carpenter, S. H., Roberts, G. F., Ozer, H., Aurangzeb, Q., Elseifi, M., & Trepanier, J. (2009). Determination of usable residual asphalt binder in RAP (Research Report ICT-09-031). IL: Center for Transportation.
2. 10.1080/14680629.2005.969000310.1080/14680629.2005.9690003 ↗
3. Baaj, H., Ech, M., Lum, P., & Forfylow, R. W. (2011). Behaviour of asphalt mixes modified with ASM & RAP (vol. 25, pp. 461–481). Proceedings of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, Quebec City.
4. 10.1617/s11527-013-0015-710.1617/s11527-013-0015-7 ↗
5. Baaj, H., & Paradis, M. (2008). Use of post-fabrication asphalt shingles in stone matrix asphalt mix (SMA-10): Laboratory characterization and field experiment on autoroute 20 (vol. 19, pp. 365–384). Proceedings of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, Saskatoon.
6. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969018010.1080/14680629.2009.9690180 ↗
7. Di Benedetto, H., & De la Roche, C. (1998). State of the art on stiffness modulus and fatigue of bituminous mixtures. Bituminous binders and mixes: State of the art and interlaboratory test on mechanical behavior and mix design (Rilem Report 17) (pp. 137–180). London: L. Francken, ed., E and FN Spon.
8. 10.1007/BF0248162010.1007/BF02481620 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(149)10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(149) ↗
10. 10.3166/RMPD.8.285-31510.3166/RMPD.8.285-315 ↗
11. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969035610.1080/14680629.2011.9690356 ↗
12. 10.3166/RMPD.10.789-81410.3166/RMPD.10.789-814 ↗
13. Ferry, J. D. (1980). Viscoelastic properties of polymers (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
14. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969524710.1080/14680629.2011.9695247 ↗
15. 10.1080/14680629.2012.71192410.1080/14680629.2012.711924 ↗
16. Lum, P., Yonke, E., & Greco, M. (2004). Field and laboratory evaluation of manufactured shingle modifier in hot mix asphalt (vol. 28, pp. 449–477). Proceedings of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, Montreal.
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(516)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(516) ↗
18. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77475110.1080/14680629.2013.774751 ↗
19. 10.1080/14680629.2013.87063910.1080/14680629.2013.870639 ↗
20. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65706610.1080/14680629.2012.657066 ↗
21. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81284610.1080/14680629.2013.812846 ↗
22. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65707010.1080/14680629.2012.657070 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.13610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.136 ↗
24. NF EN 12697-24 European Standard. (2012). Méthodes d'essai pour mélange hydrocarboné à chaud – Mélanges bitumineux – Partie 24: résistance à la fatigue (in French).
25. NF EN 12697-33 European Standard. (2004). Mélanges bitumineux – Méthodes d'essai pour mélange hydrocarboné à chaud – Partie 33: Confection d’éprouvettes au compacteur de plaque (in French).
26. NF P 98-082 French Standard (1994) Chaussées – Terrassements – Dimensionnement des chaussées routières – Détermination des trafics routiers pour le dimensionnement des structures de chaussée (in French).
27. 10.3166/EJECE.1310.3166/EJECE.13 ↗
28. 10.1617/s11527-012-9954-710.1617/s11527-012-9954-7 ↗
29. 10.1080/14680629.2011.6440810.1080/14680629.2011.64408 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000065810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000658 ↗
31. 10.1080/14680629.2003.968994610.1080/14680629.2003.9689946 ↗
32. 10.1080/14680629.2012.74262910.1080/14680629.2012.742629 ↗
33. 10.3166/RMPD.11HS10.3166/RMPD.11HS ↗
34. 10.1617/s11527-009-9491-110.1617/s11527-009-9491-1 ↗
35. 10.1617/s11527-011-9820-z10.1617/s11527-011-9820-z ↗
36. Pronk, A. C., & Hopman, P. C. (1990). Energy dissipation: The leading factor of fatigue. In the highway research: Sharing the benefits (pp. 255–267). Proceedings of the Conference of the United States Strategic Highway Research Program, London.
37. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969525910.1080/14680629.2011.9695259 ↗
38. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81284010.1080/14680629.2013.812840 ↗
39. 10.3141/1681-0110.3141/1681-01 ↗
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000063610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000636 ↗
41. 10.3166/RMPD.1210.3166/RMPD.12 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.09910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.099 ↗
43. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77931010.1080/14680629.2013.779310 ↗
44. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65704910.1080/14680629.2012.657049 ↗
45. 10.1080/14680629.2008.969010610.1080/14680629.2008.9690106 ↗
46. Yonke, E., Lum, P., Budd, D., Uzarowski, L., & Emery, J. (1999). Evaluation of manufactured shingle modifier asphalt mixes (vol. 44, pp. 175–197). Proceedings of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, Quebec City.