journal article·2018-04-03

Comparison of low-temperature fracture and strength properties of asphalt mixture obtained from IDT and SCB under different testing configurations

Augusto Cannone Falchetto, Ki Hoon Moon, Di Wang, Chiara Riccardi, Michael P. Wistuba

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents an investigation on the low-temperature properties of asphalt mixture determined with the indirect tensile (IDT) and the semi-circular bending (SCB) experimental methods. First, IDT and notched and unnotched SCB tests are performed on a set of ten different asphalt mixtures. Then, the maximum stress (strength) along the crack surface of SCB specimens is estimated using a commercial finite-element software and cohesive zone modelling. Finally, a set of simple linear relations between the numerically determined SCB strength on notched specimens and the nominal strength value experimentally measured on IDT specimens is derived. It is found that the newly proposed relationship can be potentially used to predict the asphalt mixtures’ nominal strength of IDT specimens based on SCB notched fracture tests. No good correlation could be found between SCB strength on unnotched specimens and the corresponding IDT measurements at this stage. This is most likely due to the simple FEM approach selected and the different failure mechanisms of the SCB unnotched configuration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering – ISBS, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany

Pavement Research Division, Korea Expressway Corporation (KEC), Hwa-Sung city, South Korea

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO · 2016
2. AASHTO · 2007
3. AASHTO · 2013
4. AASHTO · 2015
5. AASHTO · 2016
6. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-210.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
7. Bažant Z. P. · 2005
8. 10.1617/s11527-013-0052-210.1617/s11527-013-0052-2 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000177010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001770 ↗
10. 10.1080/14680629.2017.130425810.1080/14680629.2017.1304258 ↗
11. 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
12. EN · 2010
13. Hillerborg A. · International Journal of Fracture · 1991 · 51 · 9510.1007/BF00033972 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.08.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.08.007 ↗
15. KMLIT · 2015
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000069310.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000693 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11340-009-9303-010.1007/s11340-009-9303-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.018 ↗
19. 10.3141/1789-2110.3141/1789-21 ↗
20. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81735110.1080/14680629.2013.817351 ↗
21. Moore D. S. · 2012
22. Roque R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies · 1992 · 61 · 304
23. 10.1520/JTE1257910.1520/JTE12579 ↗
24. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77475910.1080/14680629.2013.774759 ↗
25. 10.3141/2127-1310.3141/2127-13 ↗