Faster region convolutional neural network for automated pavement distress detection
Source abstract
Abstract
Pavement images have been utilised to detect distresses. However, existing methods for detecting pavement distresses are not acceptable owing to the various real-world conditions. To complete the task, a novel detection method based on faster region convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) was utilised to recognise and locate pavement distresses including crack, pothole, oil bleeding and dot surface autonomously. Twenty Faster R-CNNs were trained and tested by 6498 pavement images. Then the performance of training was analysed to select the optimal Faster R-CNN. At last, a test and a comparative study were presented to verify the stability and superiority of the optimal one. In the testing, average results of the accuracy rates, recall rates and location errors in the optimal one were 90.4%, 89.1% and 6.521 pixels, which were close to average results of training and validation. It indicated the optimal Faster R-CNN had good performance to detect distresses in different pavements. Compared with the CNN and K-value method, the optimal Faster R-CNN located pavement distresses with bounding boxes more precisely.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
Xinjiang Transportation Planning Surveying and Design Institute, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s13042-015-0471-110.1007/s13042-015-0471-1 ↗
2. 10.1111/mice.1226310.1111/mice.12263 ↗
3. 10.1111/mice.1233410.1111/mice.12334 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.06.00810.1016/j.autcon.2016.06.008 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.15110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.151 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.11010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.110 ↗
7. 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.238982410.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 ↗
8. 10.3233/ICA-17055110.3233/ICA-170551 ↗
9. LeCun Y. · 1989
10. LeCun Y. · The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks · 1995 · 3361 · 1995
11. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.09.00510.1016/j.sigpro.2014.09.005 ↗
12. 10.1111/mice.1231310.1111/mice.12313 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.050 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jtte.2016.03.00410.1016/j.jtte.2016.03.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.11.01010.1016/j.autcon.2017.11.010 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.01810.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.018 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.10.00110.1016/j.ijprt.2016.10.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.07910.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.079 ↗
19. 10.3233/ICA-17053810.3233/ICA-170538 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.01010.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.010 ↗
21. 10.1002/tal.140010.1002/tal.1400 ↗
22. 10.14359/5168956010.14359/51689560 ↗
23. Ren S. · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · 2015 · 28 · 91
24. Sha A. · China Journal of Highway and Transport · 2018 · 31 · 1
25. 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.02.04410.1016/j.measurement.2016.02.044 ↗
26. Tong Z. · 2018
27. 10.1080/14680629.2017.130826510.1080/14680629.2017.1308265 ↗
28. Tong Z. · 2017
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.12910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.129 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.09710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.097 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.08.00910.1016/j.jpdc.2017.08.009 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.neunet.2015.07.00710.1016/j.neunet.2015.07.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.03410.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.034 ↗
34. Zeng X. · Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University · 2013 · 38 · 993