Balancing strength, durability, and environmental impacts in sewage-sludge-modified cemented clay
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study assesses the mechanical performance, freeze-thaw durability, and cradle-to-gate environmental impacts of cement-stabilised clay where cement is partially replaced with fresh sewage sludge (SS). Mixes included 5 %, 7 %, and 10 % cement (by dry soil) and SS replacement levels of 0 %, 3 %, 5 %, 7 %, and 10 % (by cement mass). Specimens were compacted to dry densities of 1.50 and 1.70 g/cm 3 , cured for 28 days, and tested for 28-day unconfined compressive strength (UCS). Freeze-thaw resistance was measured using accumulated mass loss (ALM) and observed failure behaviour. The environmental assessment employed openLCA with ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) for a functional unit of 1 m 3 of stabilised clay at the target density. UCS increased with cement content and dry density. SS replacement resulted in a non-monotonic strength response, typically peaking at 3–5 %, indicating improved cement-efficiency at low replacement levels. Under the tested conditions, UCS increased from 2,421 kPa (C10-SS0, 1.50 g/cm 3 ) to 3,814.5 kPa at SS3 in the same series. The freeze-and-thaw performance also improved significantly in the C5 series at 1.70 g/cm 3 . The control sample failed at Cycle 5 (ALM = 77.74 %), but SS3 remained intact through Cycle 12. ReCiPe midpoint impacts increased with cement content and density but decreased consistently as SS increased, resulting in 7–8 % reductions compared to controls. Strength-normalised impacts showed the greatest eco-efficiency gains at SS3-SS5, maximising environmental benefits per unit of performance. Durability-coupled indices further favoured mixtures achieving both lower impacts and reduced ALM, highlighting the importance of jointly optimising strength, durability, and environmental performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sustainable Environment and Energy Systems , Middle East Technical University, Northern Cyprus Campus , Guzelyurt , Mersin 10 , Türkiye
Civil Engineering Program , Middle East Technical University, Northern Cyprus Campus , Guzelyurt , Mersin 10 , Türkiye
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Salih, SK, Sreedharan, V, Praseeda, KI. Sustainability assessment of soil stabilisation using ground granulated blast furnace slag. In: Baser, T, Farid, A, Fei, X, Zekkos, D, editors. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics (9ICEG); 2023 Jun 25–28; Chania, Greece. International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering; 2023:212–21 pp.
2. Lee, J-B. Incorporating wastewater sludge as a cement alternative in repair mortar: an experimental study of material properties. Materials 2024;17:5625. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1722.5625.10.3390/ma17225625 ↗
3. Al-Subari, L, Hilal, A, Ekinci, A. Life cycle assessment of soil stabilisation using cement and waste additives. Constr Build Mater 2023;403:133045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133045.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133045 ↗
4. Raut, AN, Murmu, AL, Alomayri, T. Physico-mechanical and thermal behavior of prolonged heat-cured geopolymer blocks. Constr Build Mater 2023;370:130309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130309.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130309 ↗
5. Kalpana, G, Rao, CH, Adamu, M, Raut, A, Ibrahim, YE. Effect of calcium carbide residue and superplasticizer dosages on the mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash based geopolymer composites. Open Ceram 2025;22:100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2025.100794.10.1016/j.oceram.2025.100794 ↗
6. Adamu, M, Ibrahim, YE, Raut, A. High-temperature performance evaluation of sustainable date palm fiber concrete with activated carbon: an MCDM and Weibull analysis approach. Results Control Optim 2025;20:100602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2025.100602.10.1016/j.rico.2025.100602 ↗
7. Dokaneh, M, Salimi, M, Rezvani, R, Payan, M, Hosseinpour, I. Valorization of industrial wastes for stabilizing highly expansive clays: mechanical, microstructural and durability improvements. Constr Build Mater 2025;481:141497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141497.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141497 ↗
8. Dokaneh, M, Rezvani, R, Arabani, M, Hosseinpour, I, Salimi, M, Payan, M, et al.. Valorization of waste tire textile fibers for durability enhancement of expansive clay stabilized with calcium carbide residue and water treatment sludge. Transp Geotechn 2026;56:101790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101790.10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101790 ↗
9. Mahmoudi, S, Shalchian, MM, Rezvani, R, Payan, M, Hosseinpour, I, Arabani, M, et al.. An eco-efficient soil stabilization method: synergistic use of calcium carbide residue and EAF slag for bentonite soil. Results Eng 2026;29:108852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108852.10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108852 ↗
10. Mahmoudi, R, Rezvani, R, Hosseinpour, I, Payan, M, Ghanbari Astaneh, A. Effects of hydrated lime and zeolite on the mechanical behavior of calcareous sand subjected to wet-dry cycles. J Mater Civ Eng 2025;37:04024478. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17997.10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17997 ↗
11. Filho, RDT, Fontes, CMA. Sewage sludge ash. In: Siddique, R, Belarbi, R, editors. Sustainable concrete made with ashes and dust from different sources: materials, properties and applications. Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering. Amsterdam: Woodhead Publishing; 2022:233–79 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-824050-2.00010-3 ↗
12. Paul, T, Sinharoy, A. Emerging issues and their solutions related to the use of sewage sludge in waste treatment. In: Shah, MP, editor. Application of sewage sludge in industrial wastewater treatment. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2024:21–37 pp.10.1002/9781119857396.ch2 ↗
13. Dyer, TD, Halliday, JE, Dhir, RK. Hydration chemistry of sewage sludge ash used as a cement component. J Mater Civ Eng 2011;23:648–55. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000221.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000221 ↗
14. Vouk, D, Nakic, D, Stirmer, N, Cheeseman, CR. Use of sewage sludge ash in cementitious materials. Rev Adv Mater Sci 2017;49:158–70.
15. Altuncı, YT. A study on the utilisation of wastewater treatment sludge in the construction sector. Ulus Sürdürülebilir Mühendislik ve Teknoloji Derg 2024;8:211–17. https://doi.org/10.62301/usmtd.1592727.10.62301/usmtd.1592727 ↗
16. Danish, A, Ozbakkaloglu, T. Greener cementitious composites incorporating sewage sludge ash as cement replacement: a review of progress, potentials, and future prospects. J Clean Prod 2022;371:133364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133364.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133364 ↗
17. Luo, J, Yu, F, Chen, X, Li, S. Comparative sustainability investigation on a novel industrial-waste-based soil stabilizer and cement based on life cycle assessment. Sci Rep 2025;15:19936. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04809-4.10.1038/s41598-025-04809-4 ↗
18. Menéndez, E, Sanjuán, MÁ, García-Roves, R, Argiz, C, Recino, H. Sustainable and durable performance of pozzolanic additions to prevent alkali–silica reaction (ASR) promoted by aggregates with different reaction rates. Appl Sci 2020;10:9042. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10249042.10.3390/app10249042 ↗
19. Haroon, MU, Saeed, H, Ekinci, A. Optimising sewage sludge and sewage sludge ash utilisation in cement stabilised clay through durability, strength and microstructural evaluation. Geomechanics Geoengin 2025;21:1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2025.2590535.10.1080/17486025.2025.2590535 ↗
20. Haroon, MU, Ekinci, A, Balkis, AP. Sustainable strength enhancement of cement–clay composites through partial replacement with sewage sludge and sewage sludge ash. Constr Build Mater 2025;489:142330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142330.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142330 ↗
21. ASTM C150/C150M-20. Standard specification for Portland cement. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2020.
22. Hanafi, M, Javed, I, Ekinci, A. Evaluating the strength, durability and porosity characteristics of alluvial clay stabilized with marble dust as a sustainable binder. Results Eng 2025;25:103978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.103978.10.1016/j.rineng.2025.103978 ↗
23. Shafii, MA, Ling, ECM, Shaffie, E. The use of sewage sludge and its ash in construction and agriculture industry: a review. J Teknol Sci Eng 2019;81:81–90. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v81.13486.10.11113/jt.v81.13486 ↗
24. Türk Belediyesi, L. Haspolat Arıtma bölgesindeki çalışma; çevreye ciddi zarar veren sanayi ve vidanjör atıklarının zararını tamamen durdurmak için yapılıyor. Lefkoşa Türk Belediyesi 2024. https://lefkosabelediyesi.org/haberler/haspolat-ar%C4%B1tma-bolgesindeki-cal%C4%B1sma-cevreye-ciddi-zarar-veren-sanayi-ve-vidanjor-at%C4%B1klar%C4%B1n%C4%B1n-tamamen-durdurmak-icin-yap%C4%B1l%C4%B1yor [Accessed 30 Apr 2026].
25. ASTM D698-12(2021). Test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN.m/m3)). West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2021.
26. Ladd, RS. Preparing test specimens using undercompaction. Geotech Test J 1978;1:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10364J.10.1520/GTJ10364J ↗
27. ASTM D1633-17. Standard test methods for compressive strength of molded soil-cement cylinders. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2017.
28. ASTM D560-03. Standard test methods for freezing and thawing compacted soil-cement mixtures. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2003.
29. ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2006. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html.
30. ISO 14044:2006. Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2006. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html.
31. Shang, X, Chen, Y, Qi, Y, Chang, J, Yang, J, Qu, N. Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of recycled aggregates concrete blocks using accelerated carbonation curing and traditional methods. Constr Build Mater 2023;404:133207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133207.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133207 ↗
32. Ullas, S, Bindu, CS. Life cycle assessment of open-graded cement-stabilised macadam mixes: a comparative analysis. Proc Inst Civil Eng, Eng Sustain 2025. https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.25.00089.10.1680/jensu.25.00089 ↗
33. Bressi, S, Santos, J, Giunta, M, Pistonesi, L, Presti, DL. A comparative life-cycle assessment of asphalt mixtures for railway sub-ballast containing alternative materials. Resour Conserv Recycl 2018;137:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.028.10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.028 ↗
34. Sánchez, AR, Ramos, VC, Polo, MS, Ramón, MVL, Utrilla, JR. Life cycle assessment of cement production with marble waste sludges. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2021;18:10968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010968.10.3390/ijerph182010968 ↗
35. da Rocha, CG, Saldanha, RB, de Araújo, MT, Consoli, NC. Social and environmental assessments of eco-friendly pavement alternatives. Constr Build Mater 2022;325:126736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126736.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126736 ↗
36. Ige, OE, Olanrewaju, OA, Duffy, KJ, Collins, OC. Environmental impact analysis of Portland cement (CEM I) using the midpoint method. Energies 2022;15:2708. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072708.10.3390/en15072708 ↗
37. Rashedi, A, Khanam, T. Life cycle assessment of most widely adopted solar photovoltaic energy technologies by mid-point and end-point indicators of ReCiPe method. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2020;27:29075–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09194-1.10.1007/s11356-020-09194-1 ↗