Show source-provided references
1. Lehne, J, Preston, F. Making concrete change: Innovation in low-carbon cement and concrete. Chatham House Report; 2018, 13.
2. Andrew, RM. Global CO 2 emissions from cement production, 1928–2018. Earth Syst Sci Data 2019;11:1675–710. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1675-2019.
10.5194/essd-11-1675-2019 ↗3. Eggleston, HS, Buendia, L, Miwa, K, Ngara, T, Tanabe, K. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES); 2006. https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/20880391 [Accessed 21 May 2026].
4. Agency, USEPAP-42. Chapter 11: Mineral products industry – section 11.6: portland cement manufacturing, 5th ed. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2025, Volume I.
5. Anderson, J, Moncaster, A. Embodied carbon of concrete in buildings, part 1: analysis of published EPD. Buildings & Cities 2020;1:198–217. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.59.
10.5334/bc.59 ↗6. Sambataro, L, Bre, F, Ukrainczyk, N, Koenders, EAB. Environmental benchmarks for the European cement industry. Sustain Prod Consum 2024;45:429–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.020.
10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.020 ↗7. Cement, B. Environmental product declaration. Cements CEM I, CEM II, CEM III, CEM IV. CEM V Produced in Poland, Certificate 2020.
8. Snellings, R. Assessing, understanding and unlocking supplementary cementitious materials. RILEM Technical Letters 2016;1:50–5. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.12.
10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.12 ↗9. Knight, KA, Cunningham, PR, Miller, SA. Optimizing supplementary cementitious material replacement to minimize the environmental impacts of concrete. Cement Concr Compos 2023;139:105049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105049.
10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105049 ↗10. Juenger, MCG, Snellings, R, Bernal, SA. Supplementary cementitious materials: new sources, characterization, and performance insights. Cement Concr Res 2019;122:257–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008.
10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008 ↗11. Pal, SC, Mukherjee, A, Pathak, SR. Investigation of hydraulic activity of ground granulated blast furnace slag in concrete. Cement Concr Res 2003;33:1481–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00062-0.
10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00062-0 ↗12. Ahmad, J, Kontoleon, KJ, Majdi, A, Naqash, MT, Deifalla, AF, Ben Kahla, N, et al.. A comprehensive review on the ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in concrete production. Sustainability 2022;14:8783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148783.
10.3390/su14148783 ↗13. Nadarajah, A, Nasir, NAM, Bakar, NA, Safiee, NA. Fly ash-GGBS blended geopolymer mortar for early engineering characteristic at ambient temperature. Ain Shams Eng J 2024;15:102821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102821.
10.1016/j.asej.2024.102821 ↗14. Kumar, A, Bheel, N, Ahmed, I, Rizvi, SH, Kumar, R, Jhatial, AA. Effect of silica fume and fly ash as cementitious material on hardened properties and embodied carbon of roller compacted concrete. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser 2022;29:1210–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15734-0.
10.1007/s11356-021-15734-0 ↗15. Segura, IP, Ranjbar, N, Damø, AJ, Jensen, LS, Canut, M, Jensen, PA, et al.. A review: alkali-activated cement and concrete production technologies available in the industry. Heliyon 2023;9.
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15718 ↗16. Alhassan, M, Alkhawaldeh, A, Betoush, N, Alkhawaldeh, M, Huseien, GF, Amaireh, L, et al.. Life cycle assessment of the sustainability of alkali-activated binders. Biomimetics 2023;8:58. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010058.
10.3390/biomimetics8010058 ↗17. Skane, R, Jones, F, van Riessen, A, Jamieson, E, Sun, X, Rickard, WDA, et al.. Optimisation of activator solutions for geopolymer synthesis: thermochemical stability, sequencing, and standardisation. arXiv preprint arXiv 2025;15:250612941.
10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.10.162 ↗18. Tekle, BH, Holschemacher, K. Alkali activated cement mixture at ambient curing: strength, workability, and setting time. Struct Concr 2022;23:2496–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202100274.
10.1002/suco.202100274 ↗19. Rihan, MAM, Alahmari, TS, Onchiri, RO, Gathimba, N, Sabuni, B. Impact of alkaline concentration on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete made up of fly ash and sugarcane bagasse ash. Sustainability 2024;16:2841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072841.
10.3390/su16072841 ↗20. Lacante, M, Delsaute, B, Staquet, S. Effect of solution-to-binder ratio and molarity on volume changes in slag binder activated by sodium hydroxide at early age. Materials 2024;17:3308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17133308.
10.3390/ma17133308 ↗21. Gunasekara, C, Lokuge, W, Keskic, M, Raj, N, Law, DW, Setunge, S, et al.. Design of alkali-activated slag-fly ash concrete mixtures using machine learning. ACI Mater J 2020;117:263–78.
10.14359/51727019 ↗22. Qin, Y, Qu, C, Ma, C, Zhou, L. One-part alkali-activated materials: state of the art and perspectives. Polymers 2022;14:5046. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14225046.
10.3390/polym14225046 ↗23. Tipu, RK, Rathi, P, Pandya, KS, Panchal, VR. Optimizing sustainable blended concrete mixes using deep learning and multi-objective optimization. Sci Rep 2025;15:16356. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00943-1.
10.1038/s41598-025-00943-1 ↗24. Trace, C. Climate TRACE begins monthly data releases with new greenhouse gas data showing January 2025 emissions worldwide 2025. Available from: https://climatetrace.org/news/climate-trace-begins-monthly-data-releases-with-new?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
25. Tang, Z, Li, W, Hu, Y, Zhou, JL, Tam, VWY. Review on designs and properties of multifunctional alkali-activated materials (AAMs). Constr Build Mater 2019;200:474–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.157.
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.157 ↗26. Rashad, AM, Seleem, HE-DH, Shaheen, AF. Effect of silica fume and slag on compressive strength and abrasion resistance of HVFA concrete. Int J Concr Struct Mater 2014;8:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-013-0051-2.
10.1007/s40069-013-0051-2 ↗27. Liu, Y, Lu, C, Hu, X, Shi, C. Effect of silica fume on rheology of slag-fly ash-silica fume-based geopolymer pastes with different activators. Cement Concr Res 2023;174:107336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107336.
10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107336 ↗28. Gong, K, Cheng, Y, Daemen, LL, White, CE. In situ quasi-elastic neutron scattering study on the water dynamics and reaction mechanisms in alkali-activated slags. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2019;21:10277–92. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cp00889f.
10.1039/C9CP00889F ↗29. Chi, M. Effects of modulus ratio and dosage of alkali-activated solution on the properties and micro-structural characteristics of alkali-activated fly ash mortars. Constr Build Mater 2015;99:128–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.029.
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.029 ↗30. Ouyang, X, Ma, Y, Liu, Z, Liang, J, Ye, G. Effect of the sodium silicate modulus and slag content on fresh and hardened properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag. Minerals 2019;10:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10010015.
10.3390/min10010015 ↗31. Mohamed, OA. Effects of the curing regime, acid exposure, alkaline activator dosage, and precursor content on the strength development of mortar with alkali-activated slag and fly ash binder: a critical review. Polymers 2023;15:1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051248.
10.3390/polym15051248 ↗32. Antonova, A, Illarionova, E, Al-Neshawy, F, Punkki, J, editors. The effect of heat curing on the early-strength development of low-carbon concrete. Cham: Springer; 2024, vol. XLIV:809–19 pp.
10.1007/978-3-031-33187-9_74 ↗33. Li, L, Feng, T, Li, Y, Zhang, Y, Sun, W, Liu, Z, et al.. Evaluating the effect of high fly ash content and low curing temperature on early hydration heat of blended cement based on isothermal calorimetric method. Constr Build Mater 2024;430:136110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136110.
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136110 ↗34. Faridmehr, I, Nehdi, ML, Nikoo, M, Huseien, GF, Ozbakkaloglu, T. Life-cycle assessment of alkali-activated materials incorporating industrial byproducts. Materials 2021;14:2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092401.
10.3390/ma14092401 ↗35. Mohamed, R, Abd Razak, R, Abdullah, MMAB, Abd Abd Rahim, SZ, Yuan-Li, L, Sandu, AV, et al.. Heat evolution of alkali-activated materials: a review on influence factors. Constr Build Mater 2022;314:125651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125651.
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125651 ↗36. Guo, S, Wu, Y, Jia, Z, Qi, X, Wang, W. Sodium-based activators in alkali-activated materials: classification and comparison. J Build Eng 2023;70:106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106397.
10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106397 ↗37. Shin, K, Kim, J, Hwang, YW, Kim, BC, Kim, DH. LCA-based environmental benefit allocation between steel and cement industries in steel byproduct recycling. Environ Eng Res 2025;30:240032–0. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2024.032.
10.4491/eer.2024.032 ↗38. Li, Y, Liu, Y, Gong, X, Nie, Z, Cui, S, Wang, Z, et al.. Environmental impact analysis of blast furnace slag applied to ordinary Portland cement production. J Clean Prod 2016;120:221–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.071.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.071 ↗39. Shah, IH, Miller, SA, Jiang, D, Myers, RJ. Cement substitution with secondary materials can reduce annual global CO2 emissions by up to 1.3 gigatons. Nat Commun 2022;13:5758. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33289-7.
10.1038/s41467-022-33289-7 ↗40. Nikravan, M, Firdous, R, Stephan, D. Life cycle assessment of alkali-activated materials: a systematic literature review. Low-carbon Mater Green Construction 2023;1:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44242-023-00014-6.
10.1007/s44242-023-00014-6 ↗41. Shobeiri, V, Bennett, B, Xie, T, Visintin, P. A generic framework for augmented concrete mix design: optimisation of geopolymer concrete considering environmental, financial and mechanical properties. J Clean Prod 2022;369:133382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133382.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133382 ↗42. Mahjoubi, S, Barhemat, R, Guo, P, Meng, W, Bao, Y. Prediction and multi-objective optimization of mechanical, economical, and environmental properties for strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) based on automated machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms. J Clean Prod 2021;329:129665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129665.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129665 ↗43. Wang, S, Xia, P, Gong, F, Zeng, Q, Chen, K, Zhao, Y, et al.. Multi objective optimization of recycled aggregate concrete based on explainable machine learning. J Clean Prod 2024;445:141045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141045.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141045 ↗44. Huo, W, Zhu, Z, Sun, H, Ma, B, Yang, L. Development of machine learning models for the prediction of the compressive strength of calcium-based geopolymers. J Clean Prod 2022;380:135159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135159.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135159 ↗45. Pan, L, Wang, Y, Zhang, B, Guo, X, Shi, C, Liu, Y, et al.. Intelligent optimization of FAH concrete mix ratio design considering the carbon emission allocation principles of by-products and critical transportation distances. J Clean Prod 2025;490:144656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144656.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144656 ↗46. Zheng, W, Shui, Z, Xu, Z, Gao, X, Zhang, S. Multi-objective optimization of concrete mix design based on machine learning. J Build Eng 2023;76:107396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107396.
10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107396 ↗47. Jin, L, Zhang, Y, Liu, P, Fan, T, Wu, T, Wu, Q, et al.. Carbon-footprint based concrete proportion design using LSTM and MOPSO algorithms. Mater Today Commun 2024;38:107837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107837.
10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107837 ↗48. Abuhussain, MA, Ahmad, A, Amin, MN, Althoey, F, Gamil, Y, Najeh, T, et al.. Data-driven approaches for strength prediction of alkali-activated composites. Case Stud Constr Mater 2024;20:e02920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02920.
10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02920 ↗49. Ahmad, W, Veeraghantla, VSSCS, Byrne, A. Advancing sustainable concrete using biochar: experimental and modelling study for mechanical strength evaluation. Sustainability 2025;17:2516. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062516.
10.3390/su17062516 ↗50. DeRousseau, MA, Kasprzyk, JR, Srubar, IWV. Multi-objective optimization methods for designing low-carbon concrete mixtures. Front Mater 2021;8:680895. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.680895.
10.3389/fmats.2021.680895 ↗51. Shah, SFA, Chen, B, Zahid, M, Ahmad, MR. Compressive strength prediction of one-part alkali activated material enabled by interpretable machine learning. Constr Build Mater 2022;360:129534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129534.
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129534 ↗52. Altuncı, YT. A comprehensive study on the estimation of concrete compressive strength using machine learning models. Buildings 2024;14:3851. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123851.
10.3390/buildings14123851 ↗53. Kong, Y. Optimization of sustainable mix design for alkali-activated materials using machine learning methods [Ph.D. thesis]. Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaido University; 2024.
54. Ahmad, A, Ostrowski, KA, Maślak, M, Farooq, F, Mehmood, I, Nafees, A, et al.. Comparative study of supervised machine learning algorithms for predicting the compressive strength of concrete at high temperature. Materials 2021;14:4222. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154222.
10.3390/ma14154222 ↗55. Ziolkowski, P, Niedostatkiewicz, M. Machine learning techniques in concrete mix design. Materials 2019;12:1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081256.
10.3390/ma12081256 ↗56. Amin, MN, Ahmad, A, Khan, K, Ahmad, W, Ehsan, S, Alabdullah, AA, et al.. Predicting the rheological properties of super-plasticized concrete using modeling techniques. Materials 2022;15:5208. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155208.
10.3390/ma15155208 ↗57. Song, H, Ahmad, A, Farooq, F, Ostrowski, KA, Maślak, M, Czarnecki, S, et al.. Predicting the compressive strength of concrete with fly ash admixture using machine learning algorithms. Constr Build Mater 2021;308:125021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125021.
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125021 ↗58. Al-Hashem, MN, Amin, MN, Ahmad, W, Khan, K, Ahmad, A, Ehsan, S, et al.. Data-driven techniques for evaluating the mechanical strength and raw material effects of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials 2022;15:6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196928.
10.3390/ma15196928 ↗59. Javed, MF, Khan, M, Fawad, M, Alabduljabbar, H, Najeh, T, Gamil, Y, et al.. Comparative analysis of various machine learning algorithms to predict strength properties of sustainable green concrete containing waste foundry sand. Sci Rep 2024;14:14617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65255-2.
10.1038/s41598-024-65255-2 ↗60. Uddin, MA, Sobuz, MHR, Kabbo, MKI, Tilak, MKC, Lal, R, Reza, MS, et al.. Predicting the mechanical performance of industrial waste incorporated sustainable concrete using hybrid machine learning modeling and parametric analyses. Sci Rep 2025;15:26330. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11601-x.
10.1038/s41598-025-11601-x ↗61. Afzal, S, Ziapour, BM, Shokri, A, Shakibi, H, Sobhani, B. Building energy consumption prediction using multilayer perceptron neural network-assisted models; comparison of different optimization algorithms. Energy 2023;282:128446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128446.
10.1016/j.energy.2023.128446 ↗62. Nosratabadi, S, Ardabili, S, Lakner, Z, Mako, C, Mosavi, A. Prediction of food production using machine learning algorithms of multilayer perceptron and ANFIS. Agriculture 2021;11:408. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11050408.
10.3390/agriculture11050408 ↗63. Panahi, F, Ehteram, M, Ahmed, AN, Huang, YF, Mosavi, A, El-Shafie, A, et al.. Streamflow prediction with large climate indices using several hybrid multilayer perceptrons and copula Bayesian model averaging. Ecol Indic 2021;133:108285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108285.
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108285 ↗64. Lal, MS, Ravi Prasad, D, Ramaseshu, D. A review of machine learning models for concrete strength prediction and mix optimization. J Building Pathology Rehabilit 2025;10:128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-025-00636-2.
10.1007/s41024-025-00636-2 ↗65. Anjum, M, Khan, K, Ahmad, W, Ahmad, A, Amin, MN, Nafees, A, et al.. New SHapley additive ExPlanations (SHAP) approach to evaluate the raw materials interactions of steel-fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials 2022;15:6261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186261.
10.3390/ma15186261 ↗66. Shafighfard, T, Kazemi, F, Asgarkhani, N, Yoo, DY. Machine-learning methods for estimating compressive strength of high-performance alkali-activated concrete. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2024;136:109053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109053.
10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109053 ↗67. Shafighfard, T, Kazemi, F, Asgarkhani, N, Yoo, DY. Machine-learning methods for estimating compressive strength of high-performance alkali-activated concrete. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2024;136:109053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109053.
10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109053 ↗68. Lyngdoh, GA, Zaki, M, Krishnan, NMA, Das, S. Prediction of concrete strengths enabled by missing data imputation and interpretable machine learning. Cement Concr Compos 2022;128:104414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104414.
10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104414 ↗69. Xu, J, Zhou, L, He, G, Ji, X, Dai, Y, Dang, Y, et al.. Comprehensive machine learning-based model for predicting compressive strength of ready-mix concrete. Materials 2021;14:1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051068.
10.3390/ma14051068 ↗70. D’hooge, L, Verkerken, M, Volckaert, B, Wauters, T, De Turck, F, editors. Establishing the contaminating effect of metadata feature inclusion in machine-learned network intrusion detection models. In: Lecture notes in computer science. Cham: Springer; 2022, vol. XMMMCCCLVIII:23–41 pp.
10.1007/978-3-031-09484-2_2 ↗71. Chou, JS, Pham, AD. Enhanced artificial intelligence for ensemble approach to predicting high performance concrete compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 2013;49:554–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.078.
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.078 ↗72. Habert, G, Roussel, N. Study of two concrete mix-design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives. Cement Concr Compos 2009;31:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.001.
10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.001 ↗73. Turner, LK, Collins, FG. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater 2013;43:125–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023.
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 ↗75. Pham, AD, Ngo, NT, Nguyen, QT, Truong, NS. Hybrid machine learning for predicting strength of sustainable concrete. Soft Comput-A Fusion Found Method App 2020;24:14965–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04848-1.
10.1007/s00500-020-04848-1 ↗76. Nematollahi, B, Sanjayan, J, Ahmed, SFU. Tensile strain hardening behavior of PVA fiber-reinforced engineered geopolymer composite. J Mater Civ Eng 2015;27:04015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001242.
10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001242 ↗77. Islam, A, Alengaram, UJ, Jumaat, MZ, Bashar, II. The development of compressive strength of ground granulated blast furnace slag-palm oil fuel ash-fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Mater Des (1980–2015) 2014;56:833–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.080.
10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.080 ↗78. Elhishi, S, Elashry, AM, El-Metwally, S. Unboxing machine learning models for concrete strength prediction using XAI. Sci Rep 2023;13:19892. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47169-7.
10.1038/s41598-023-47169-7 ↗79. Pal, A, Ahmed, KS, Hossain, FMZ, Alam, MS. Machine learning models for predicting compressive strength of fiber-reinforced concrete containing waste rubber and recycled aggregate. J Clean Prod 2023;423:138673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138673.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138673 ↗80. Luo, X, Li, Y, Wang, Q, Mu, J, Liu, Y. Machine learning based modeling for predicting the compressive strength of solid waste material-incorporated magnesium phosphate cement. J Clean Prod 2024;442:141172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141172.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141172 ↗81. Zhou, R, Tang, Y, Li, H, Liu, Z. Predicting the compressive strength of ultra-high-performance concrete using a decision tree machine learning model enhanced by the integration of two optimization meta-heuristic algorithms. J Eng Appl Sci 2024;71:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-023-00350-1.
10.1186/s44147-023-00350-1 ↗82. Zhou, J, Su, Z, Hosseini, S, Tian, Q, Lu, Y, Luo, H, et al.. Decision tree models for the estimation of geo-polymer concrete compressive strength. Math Biosci Eng 2024;21:1413–44. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024061.
10.3934/mbe.2024061 ↗83. Sah, AK, Hong, Y-M. Performance comparison of machine learning models for concrete compressive strength prediction. Materials 2024;17:2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092075.
10.3390/ma17092075 ↗84. Yuan, X, Cao, Q, Nasir Amin, M, Ahmad, A, Ahmad, W, Althoey, F, et al.. Predicting the crack width of the engineered cementitious materials via standard machine learning algorithms. J Mater Res Technol 2023;24:6187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.209.
10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.209 ↗85. Khan, K, Ahmad, W, Amin, MN, Ahmad, A, Nazar, S, Alabdullah, AA, et al.. Compressive strength estimation of steel-fiber-reinforced concrete and raw material interactions using advanced algorithms. Polymers 2022;14:3065. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153065.
10.3390/polym14153065 ↗86. Al-Hashem, MN, Amin, MN, Ahmad, W, Khan, K, Ahmad, A, Ehsan, S, et al.. Data-driven techniques for evaluating the mechanical strength and raw material effects of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials 2022;15:6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196928.
10.3390/ma15196928 ↗87. Farooq, F, Ahmed, W, Akbar, A, Aslam, F, Alyousef, R. Predictive modeling for sustainable high-performance concrete from industrial wastes: a comparison and optimization of models using ensemble learners. J Clean Prod 2021;292:126032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126032.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126032 ↗88. Li, D, Tang, Z, Kang, Q, Zhang, X, Li, Y. Machine learning-based method for predicting compressive strength of concrete. Processes 2023;11:390. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020390.
10.3390/pr11020390 ↗89. Chopra, P, Sharma, RK, Kumar, M, Chopra, T. Comparison of machine learning techniques for the prediction of compressive strength of concrete. Adv Civ Eng 2018;2018:5481705. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5481705.
10.1155/2018/5481705 ↗90. Liu, W, Liu, G, Zhu, X. Applicability of machine learning algorithms in predicting chloride diffusion in concrete: modeling, evaluation, and feature analysis. Case Stud Constr Mater 2024;21:e03573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03573.
10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03573 ↗91. Al-Shamasneh, AR, Mahmoodzadeh, A, Karim, FK, Saidani, T, Alghamdi, A, Alnahas, J, et al.. Application of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of steel fiber reinforced concrete. Sci Rep 2025;15:30674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16516-1.
10.1038/s41598-025-16516-1 ↗92. Zhao, Y, Qin, P, Wang, Z. Multi-objective optimization and machine learning techniques for predicting early-age shrinkage in ultra-high-performance concrete. Mater Today Commun 2025;47:112925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112925.
10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112925 ↗93. Sun, Y. Explainable prediction of compressive strength and elastic modulus for concrete containing waste foundry sand using Bayesian-optimized XGBoost with 10-fold cross-validation. J Sustain Metall 2024;10:335–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-024-00790-w.
10.1007/s40831-024-00790-w ↗94. Ali, YA, Awwad, EM, Al-Razgan, M, Maarouf, A. Hyperparameter search for machine learning algorithms for optimizing the computational complexity. Processes 2023;11:349. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020349.
10.3390/pr11020349 ↗95. Kern, C, Klausch, T, Kreuter, F. Tree-based machine learning methods for survey research. Surv Res Method 2019;13:73–93.
96. Kruse, R, Mostaghim, S, Borgelt, C, Braune, C, Steinbrecher, M. Multi-layer perceptrons. In: Computational intelligence: a methodological introduction. Cham: Springer; 2022:53–124 pp.
10.1007/978-3-030-42227-1_5 ↗97. Lundberg, SM, Lee, S-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2017;30.
98. Friedman, JH. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 2001:1189–232.
10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗99. Christoph, M. Interpretable machine learning: a guide for making black box models explainable. Morrisville, North Carolina: Lulu.com; 2020. https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/ [Accessed 21 May 2026].
100. Habert, G, Miller, SA, John, VM, Provis, JL, Favier, A, Horvath, A, et al.. Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nat Rev Earth Environ 2020;1:559–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0093-3.
10.1038/s43017-020-0093-3 ↗