journal article·2026-01-23Open access

Reducing clinker dependency through harmonized mix design of multi-supplemented concrete

Ahmed A. Alawi Al-Naghi, Asad Naeem, Enamur R. Latifee, Muhammad Nasir Amin, Nawaf Alnawmasi, Omar Algassem, Muhammad Tahir Amin, Mustapha Boukendakdji

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the combined influence of binder substitution and alkaline activator dosage on the mechanical performance of alkali-activated materials incorporating ground granulated blast-furnace slag using an integrated experimental and machine-learning-based framework. A comprehensive dataset comprising mix-design parameters and compressive-strength results under different curing conditions was analysed using multiple predictive models. The developed models demonstrated strong agreement between measured and predicted strengths, indicating robust predictive capability across the investigated parameter space. Ensemble tree-based models demonstrated superior predictive capability, achieving coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.87–0.89 on the testing phase with root mean square error between 10.5 and 11.2 MPa and mean absolute errors generally below 10 MPa. Feature-importance and interpretability analyses, including partial dependence plots, revealed the relative contribution of key variables, identifying binder composition and activator dosage as dominant factors governing strength development, while curing conditions exhibited secondary but non-negligible effects. The results provide quantitative insight into how variations in binder substitution levels and activator content influence material performance, enhancing understanding of parameter sensitivity and interaction effects. Overall, the findings support data-driven assessment of mix-design strategies and highlight the potential of machine-learning tools for interpreting performance trends in alkali-activated materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering Department , University of Ha’il , Ha’il , 55476 , Saudi Arabia

Department of Structural Engineering , Military College of Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Risalpur Campus , Risalpur , 24080 , Pakistan

NUST Institute of Civil Engineering (NICE), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (SCEE), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST) , Sector H-12 , Islamabad , Pakistan

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering , College of Engineering, King Faisal University , Al-Ahsa, 31982 , Al-Hofuf , Saudi Arabia

Funding

Scientific Research Deanship at University of Ha’il – Saudi Arabia

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Lehne, J, Preston, F. Making concrete change: Innovation in low-carbon cement and concrete. Chatham House Report; 2018, 13.
2. Andrew, RM. Global CO 2 emissions from cement production, 1928–2018. Earth Syst Sci Data 2019;11:1675–710. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1675-2019.10.5194/essd-11-1675-2019 ↗
3. Eggleston, HS, Buendia, L, Miwa, K, Ngara, T, Tanabe, K. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES); 2006. https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/20880391 [Accessed 21 May 2026].
4. Agency, USEPAP-42. Chapter 11: Mineral products industry – section 11.6: portland cement manufacturing, 5th ed. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2025, Volume I.
5. Anderson, J, Moncaster, A. Embodied carbon of concrete in buildings, part 1: analysis of published EPD. Buildings & Cities 2020;1:198–217. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.59.10.5334/bc.59 ↗
6. Sambataro, L, Bre, F, Ukrainczyk, N, Koenders, EAB. Environmental benchmarks for the European cement industry. Sustain Prod Consum 2024;45:429–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.020.10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.020 ↗
7. Cement, B. Environmental product declaration. Cements CEM I, CEM II, CEM III, CEM IV. CEM V Produced in Poland, Certificate 2020.
8. Snellings, R. Assessing, understanding and unlocking supplementary cementitious materials. RILEM Technical Letters 2016;1:50–5. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.12.10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.12 ↗
9. Knight, KA, Cunningham, PR, Miller, SA. Optimizing supplementary cementitious material replacement to minimize the environmental impacts of concrete. Cement Concr Compos 2023;139:105049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105049.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105049 ↗
10. Juenger, MCG, Snellings, R, Bernal, SA. Supplementary cementitious materials: new sources, characterization, and performance insights. Cement Concr Res 2019;122:257–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008.10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008 ↗
11. Pal, SC, Mukherjee, A, Pathak, SR. Investigation of hydraulic activity of ground granulated blast furnace slag in concrete. Cement Concr Res 2003;33:1481–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00062-0.10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00062-0 ↗
12. Ahmad, J, Kontoleon, KJ, Majdi, A, Naqash, MT, Deifalla, AF, Ben Kahla, N, et al.. A comprehensive review on the ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in concrete production. Sustainability 2022;14:8783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148783.10.3390/su14148783 ↗
13. Nadarajah, A, Nasir, NAM, Bakar, NA, Safiee, NA. Fly ash-GGBS blended geopolymer mortar for early engineering characteristic at ambient temperature. Ain Shams Eng J 2024;15:102821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102821.10.1016/j.asej.2024.102821 ↗
14. Kumar, A, Bheel, N, Ahmed, I, Rizvi, SH, Kumar, R, Jhatial, AA. Effect of silica fume and fly ash as cementitious material on hardened properties and embodied carbon of roller compacted concrete. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser 2022;29:1210–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15734-0.10.1007/s11356-021-15734-0 ↗
15. Segura, IP, Ranjbar, N, Damø, AJ, Jensen, LS, Canut, M, Jensen, PA, et al.. A review: alkali-activated cement and concrete production technologies available in the industry. Heliyon 2023;9.10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15718 ↗
16. Alhassan, M, Alkhawaldeh, A, Betoush, N, Alkhawaldeh, M, Huseien, GF, Amaireh, L, et al.. Life cycle assessment of the sustainability of alkali-activated binders. Biomimetics 2023;8:58. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010058.10.3390/biomimetics8010058 ↗
17. Skane, R, Jones, F, van Riessen, A, Jamieson, E, Sun, X, Rickard, WDA, et al.. Optimisation of activator solutions for geopolymer synthesis: thermochemical stability, sequencing, and standardisation. arXiv preprint arXiv 2025;15:250612941.10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.10.162 ↗
18. Tekle, BH, Holschemacher, K. Alkali activated cement mixture at ambient curing: strength, workability, and setting time. Struct Concr 2022;23:2496–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202100274.10.1002/suco.202100274 ↗
19. Rihan, MAM, Alahmari, TS, Onchiri, RO, Gathimba, N, Sabuni, B. Impact of alkaline concentration on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete made up of fly ash and sugarcane bagasse ash. Sustainability 2024;16:2841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072841.10.3390/su16072841 ↗
20. Lacante, M, Delsaute, B, Staquet, S. Effect of solution-to-binder ratio and molarity on volume changes in slag binder activated by sodium hydroxide at early age. Materials 2024;17:3308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17133308.10.3390/ma17133308 ↗
21. Gunasekara, C, Lokuge, W, Keskic, M, Raj, N, Law, DW, Setunge, S, et al.. Design of alkali-activated slag-fly ash concrete mixtures using machine learning. ACI Mater J 2020;117:263–78.10.14359/51727019 ↗
22. Qin, Y, Qu, C, Ma, C, Zhou, L. One-part alkali-activated materials: state of the art and perspectives. Polymers 2022;14:5046. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14225046.10.3390/polym14225046 ↗
23. Tipu, RK, Rathi, P, Pandya, KS, Panchal, VR. Optimizing sustainable blended concrete mixes using deep learning and multi-objective optimization. Sci Rep 2025;15:16356. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00943-1.10.1038/s41598-025-00943-1 ↗
24. Trace, C. Climate TRACE begins monthly data releases with new greenhouse gas data showing January 2025 emissions worldwide 2025. Available from: https://climatetrace.org/news/climate-trace-begins-monthly-data-releases-with-new?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
25. Tang, Z, Li, W, Hu, Y, Zhou, JL, Tam, VWY. Review on designs and properties of multifunctional alkali-activated materials (AAMs). Constr Build Mater 2019;200:474–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.157.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.157 ↗
26. Rashad, AM, Seleem, HE-DH, Shaheen, AF. Effect of silica fume and slag on compressive strength and abrasion resistance of HVFA concrete. Int J Concr Struct Mater 2014;8:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-013-0051-2.10.1007/s40069-013-0051-2 ↗
27. Liu, Y, Lu, C, Hu, X, Shi, C. Effect of silica fume on rheology of slag-fly ash-silica fume-based geopolymer pastes with different activators. Cement Concr Res 2023;174:107336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107336.10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107336 ↗
28. Gong, K, Cheng, Y, Daemen, LL, White, CE. In situ quasi-elastic neutron scattering study on the water dynamics and reaction mechanisms in alkali-activated slags. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2019;21:10277–92. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cp00889f.10.1039/C9CP00889F ↗
29. Chi, M. Effects of modulus ratio and dosage of alkali-activated solution on the properties and micro-structural characteristics of alkali-activated fly ash mortars. Constr Build Mater 2015;99:128–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.029.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.029 ↗
30. Ouyang, X, Ma, Y, Liu, Z, Liang, J, Ye, G. Effect of the sodium silicate modulus and slag content on fresh and hardened properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag. Minerals 2019;10:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10010015.10.3390/min10010015 ↗
31. Mohamed, OA. Effects of the curing regime, acid exposure, alkaline activator dosage, and precursor content on the strength development of mortar with alkali-activated slag and fly ash binder: a critical review. Polymers 2023;15:1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051248.10.3390/polym15051248 ↗
32. Antonova, A, Illarionova, E, Al-Neshawy, F, Punkki, J, editors. The effect of heat curing on the early-strength development of low-carbon concrete. Cham: Springer; 2024, vol. XLIV:809–19 pp.10.1007/978-3-031-33187-9_74 ↗
33. Li, L, Feng, T, Li, Y, Zhang, Y, Sun, W, Liu, Z, et al.. Evaluating the effect of high fly ash content and low curing temperature on early hydration heat of blended cement based on isothermal calorimetric method. Constr Build Mater 2024;430:136110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136110.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136110 ↗
34. Faridmehr, I, Nehdi, ML, Nikoo, M, Huseien, GF, Ozbakkaloglu, T. Life-cycle assessment of alkali-activated materials incorporating industrial byproducts. Materials 2021;14:2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092401.10.3390/ma14092401 ↗
35. Mohamed, R, Abd Razak, R, Abdullah, MMAB, Abd Abd Rahim, SZ, Yuan-Li, L, Sandu, AV, et al.. Heat evolution of alkali-activated materials: a review on influence factors. Constr Build Mater 2022;314:125651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125651.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125651 ↗
36. Guo, S, Wu, Y, Jia, Z, Qi, X, Wang, W. Sodium-based activators in alkali-activated materials: classification and comparison. J Build Eng 2023;70:106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106397.10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106397 ↗
37. Shin, K, Kim, J, Hwang, YW, Kim, BC, Kim, DH. LCA-based environmental benefit allocation between steel and cement industries in steel byproduct recycling. Environ Eng Res 2025;30:240032–0. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2024.032.10.4491/eer.2024.032 ↗
38. Li, Y, Liu, Y, Gong, X, Nie, Z, Cui, S, Wang, Z, et al.. Environmental impact analysis of blast furnace slag applied to ordinary Portland cement production. J Clean Prod 2016;120:221–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.071.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.071 ↗
39. Shah, IH, Miller, SA, Jiang, D, Myers, RJ. Cement substitution with secondary materials can reduce annual global CO2 emissions by up to 1.3 gigatons. Nat Commun 2022;13:5758. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33289-7.10.1038/s41467-022-33289-7 ↗
40. Nikravan, M, Firdous, R, Stephan, D. Life cycle assessment of alkali-activated materials: a systematic literature review. Low-carbon Mater Green Construction 2023;1:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44242-023-00014-6.10.1007/s44242-023-00014-6 ↗
41. Shobeiri, V, Bennett, B, Xie, T, Visintin, P. A generic framework for augmented concrete mix design: optimisation of geopolymer concrete considering environmental, financial and mechanical properties. J Clean Prod 2022;369:133382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133382.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133382 ↗
42. Mahjoubi, S, Barhemat, R, Guo, P, Meng, W, Bao, Y. Prediction and multi-objective optimization of mechanical, economical, and environmental properties for strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) based on automated machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms. J Clean Prod 2021;329:129665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129665.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129665 ↗
43. Wang, S, Xia, P, Gong, F, Zeng, Q, Chen, K, Zhao, Y, et al.. Multi objective optimization of recycled aggregate concrete based on explainable machine learning. J Clean Prod 2024;445:141045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141045.10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141045 ↗
44. Huo, W, Zhu, Z, Sun, H, Ma, B, Yang, L. Development of machine learning models for the prediction of the compressive strength of calcium-based geopolymers. J Clean Prod 2022;380:135159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135159.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135159 ↗
45. Pan, L, Wang, Y, Zhang, B, Guo, X, Shi, C, Liu, Y, et al.. Intelligent optimization of FAH concrete mix ratio design considering the carbon emission allocation principles of by-products and critical transportation distances. J Clean Prod 2025;490:144656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144656.10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144656 ↗
46. Zheng, W, Shui, Z, Xu, Z, Gao, X, Zhang, S. Multi-objective optimization of concrete mix design based on machine learning. J Build Eng 2023;76:107396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107396.10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107396 ↗
47. Jin, L, Zhang, Y, Liu, P, Fan, T, Wu, T, Wu, Q, et al.. Carbon-footprint based concrete proportion design using LSTM and MOPSO algorithms. Mater Today Commun 2024;38:107837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107837.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107837 ↗
48. Abuhussain, MA, Ahmad, A, Amin, MN, Althoey, F, Gamil, Y, Najeh, T, et al.. Data-driven approaches for strength prediction of alkali-activated composites. Case Stud Constr Mater 2024;20:e02920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02920.10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02920 ↗
49. Ahmad, W, Veeraghantla, VSSCS, Byrne, A. Advancing sustainable concrete using biochar: experimental and modelling study for mechanical strength evaluation. Sustainability 2025;17:2516. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062516.10.3390/su17062516 ↗
50. DeRousseau, MA, Kasprzyk, JR, Srubar, IWV. Multi-objective optimization methods for designing low-carbon concrete mixtures. Front Mater 2021;8:680895. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.680895.10.3389/fmats.2021.680895 ↗
51. Shah, SFA, Chen, B, Zahid, M, Ahmad, MR. Compressive strength prediction of one-part alkali activated material enabled by interpretable machine learning. Constr Build Mater 2022;360:129534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129534.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129534 ↗
52. Altuncı, YT. A comprehensive study on the estimation of concrete compressive strength using machine learning models. Buildings 2024;14:3851. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123851.10.3390/buildings14123851 ↗
53. Kong, Y. Optimization of sustainable mix design for alkali-activated materials using machine learning methods [Ph.D. thesis]. Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaido University; 2024.
54. Ahmad, A, Ostrowski, KA, Maślak, M, Farooq, F, Mehmood, I, Nafees, A, et al.. Comparative study of supervised machine learning algorithms for predicting the compressive strength of concrete at high temperature. Materials 2021;14:4222. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154222.10.3390/ma14154222 ↗
55. Ziolkowski, P, Niedostatkiewicz, M. Machine learning techniques in concrete mix design. Materials 2019;12:1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081256.10.3390/ma12081256 ↗
56. Amin, MN, Ahmad, A, Khan, K, Ahmad, W, Ehsan, S, Alabdullah, AA, et al.. Predicting the rheological properties of super-plasticized concrete using modeling techniques. Materials 2022;15:5208. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155208.10.3390/ma15155208 ↗
57. Song, H, Ahmad, A, Farooq, F, Ostrowski, KA, Maślak, M, Czarnecki, S, et al.. Predicting the compressive strength of concrete with fly ash admixture using machine learning algorithms. Constr Build Mater 2021;308:125021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125021.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125021 ↗
58. Al-Hashem, MN, Amin, MN, Ahmad, W, Khan, K, Ahmad, A, Ehsan, S, et al.. Data-driven techniques for evaluating the mechanical strength and raw material effects of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials 2022;15:6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196928.10.3390/ma15196928 ↗
59. Javed, MF, Khan, M, Fawad, M, Alabduljabbar, H, Najeh, T, Gamil, Y, et al.. Comparative analysis of various machine learning algorithms to predict strength properties of sustainable green concrete containing waste foundry sand. Sci Rep 2024;14:14617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65255-2.10.1038/s41598-024-65255-2 ↗
60. Uddin, MA, Sobuz, MHR, Kabbo, MKI, Tilak, MKC, Lal, R, Reza, MS, et al.. Predicting the mechanical performance of industrial waste incorporated sustainable concrete using hybrid machine learning modeling and parametric analyses. Sci Rep 2025;15:26330. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11601-x.10.1038/s41598-025-11601-x ↗
61. Afzal, S, Ziapour, BM, Shokri, A, Shakibi, H, Sobhani, B. Building energy consumption prediction using multilayer perceptron neural network-assisted models; comparison of different optimization algorithms. Energy 2023;282:128446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128446.10.1016/j.energy.2023.128446 ↗
62. Nosratabadi, S, Ardabili, S, Lakner, Z, Mako, C, Mosavi, A. Prediction of food production using machine learning algorithms of multilayer perceptron and ANFIS. Agriculture 2021;11:408. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11050408.10.3390/agriculture11050408 ↗
63. Panahi, F, Ehteram, M, Ahmed, AN, Huang, YF, Mosavi, A, El-Shafie, A, et al.. Streamflow prediction with large climate indices using several hybrid multilayer perceptrons and copula Bayesian model averaging. Ecol Indic 2021;133:108285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108285.10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108285 ↗
64. Lal, MS, Ravi Prasad, D, Ramaseshu, D. A review of machine learning models for concrete strength prediction and mix optimization. J Building Pathology Rehabilit 2025;10:128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-025-00636-2.10.1007/s41024-025-00636-2 ↗
65. Anjum, M, Khan, K, Ahmad, W, Ahmad, A, Amin, MN, Nafees, A, et al.. New SHapley additive ExPlanations (SHAP) approach to evaluate the raw materials interactions of steel-fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials 2022;15:6261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186261.10.3390/ma15186261 ↗
66. Shafighfard, T, Kazemi, F, Asgarkhani, N, Yoo, DY. Machine-learning methods for estimating compressive strength of high-performance alkali-activated concrete. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2024;136:109053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109053.10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109053 ↗
67. Shafighfard, T, Kazemi, F, Asgarkhani, N, Yoo, DY. Machine-learning methods for estimating compressive strength of high-performance alkali-activated concrete. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2024;136:109053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109053.10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109053 ↗
68. Lyngdoh, GA, Zaki, M, Krishnan, NMA, Das, S. Prediction of concrete strengths enabled by missing data imputation and interpretable machine learning. Cement Concr Compos 2022;128:104414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104414.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104414 ↗
69. Xu, J, Zhou, L, He, G, Ji, X, Dai, Y, Dang, Y, et al.. Comprehensive machine learning-based model for predicting compressive strength of ready-mix concrete. Materials 2021;14:1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051068.10.3390/ma14051068 ↗
70. D’hooge, L, Verkerken, M, Volckaert, B, Wauters, T, De Turck, F, editors. Establishing the contaminating effect of metadata feature inclusion in machine-learned network intrusion detection models. In: Lecture notes in computer science. Cham: Springer; 2022, vol. XMMMCCCLVIII:23–41 pp.10.1007/978-3-031-09484-2_2 ↗
71. Chou, JS, Pham, AD. Enhanced artificial intelligence for ensemble approach to predicting high performance concrete compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 2013;49:554–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.078.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.078 ↗
72. Habert, G, Roussel, N. Study of two concrete mix-design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives. Cement Concr Compos 2009;31:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.001.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.001 ↗
73. Turner, LK, Collins, FG. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater 2013;43:125–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 ↗
74. Provis, JL. Alkali-activated materials. Cement Concr Res 2018;114:40–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.009.10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.009 ↗
75. Pham, AD, Ngo, NT, Nguyen, QT, Truong, NS. Hybrid machine learning for predicting strength of sustainable concrete. Soft Comput-A Fusion Found Method App 2020;24:14965–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04848-1.10.1007/s00500-020-04848-1 ↗
76. Nematollahi, B, Sanjayan, J, Ahmed, SFU. Tensile strain hardening behavior of PVA fiber-reinforced engineered geopolymer composite. J Mater Civ Eng 2015;27:04015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001242.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001242 ↗
77. Islam, A, Alengaram, UJ, Jumaat, MZ, Bashar, II. The development of compressive strength of ground granulated blast furnace slag-palm oil fuel ash-fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Mater Des (1980–2015) 2014;56:833–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.080.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.080 ↗
78. Elhishi, S, Elashry, AM, El-Metwally, S. Unboxing machine learning models for concrete strength prediction using XAI. Sci Rep 2023;13:19892. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47169-7.10.1038/s41598-023-47169-7 ↗
79. Pal, A, Ahmed, KS, Hossain, FMZ, Alam, MS. Machine learning models for predicting compressive strength of fiber-reinforced concrete containing waste rubber and recycled aggregate. J Clean Prod 2023;423:138673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138673.10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138673 ↗
80. Luo, X, Li, Y, Wang, Q, Mu, J, Liu, Y. Machine learning based modeling for predicting the compressive strength of solid waste material-incorporated magnesium phosphate cement. J Clean Prod 2024;442:141172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141172.10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141172 ↗
81. Zhou, R, Tang, Y, Li, H, Liu, Z. Predicting the compressive strength of ultra-high-performance concrete using a decision tree machine learning model enhanced by the integration of two optimization meta-heuristic algorithms. J Eng Appl Sci 2024;71:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-023-00350-1.10.1186/s44147-023-00350-1 ↗
82. Zhou, J, Su, Z, Hosseini, S, Tian, Q, Lu, Y, Luo, H, et al.. Decision tree models for the estimation of geo-polymer concrete compressive strength. Math Biosci Eng 2024;21:1413–44. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024061.10.3934/mbe.2024061 ↗
83. Sah, AK, Hong, Y-M. Performance comparison of machine learning models for concrete compressive strength prediction. Materials 2024;17:2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092075.10.3390/ma17092075 ↗
84. Yuan, X, Cao, Q, Nasir Amin, M, Ahmad, A, Ahmad, W, Althoey, F, et al.. Predicting the crack width of the engineered cementitious materials via standard machine learning algorithms. J Mater Res Technol 2023;24:6187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.209.10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.209 ↗
85. Khan, K, Ahmad, W, Amin, MN, Ahmad, A, Nazar, S, Alabdullah, AA, et al.. Compressive strength estimation of steel-fiber-reinforced concrete and raw material interactions using advanced algorithms. Polymers 2022;14:3065. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153065.10.3390/polym14153065 ↗
86. Al-Hashem, MN, Amin, MN, Ahmad, W, Khan, K, Ahmad, A, Ehsan, S, et al.. Data-driven techniques for evaluating the mechanical strength and raw material effects of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials 2022;15:6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196928.10.3390/ma15196928 ↗
87. Farooq, F, Ahmed, W, Akbar, A, Aslam, F, Alyousef, R. Predictive modeling for sustainable high-performance concrete from industrial wastes: a comparison and optimization of models using ensemble learners. J Clean Prod 2021;292:126032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126032.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126032 ↗
88. Li, D, Tang, Z, Kang, Q, Zhang, X, Li, Y. Machine learning-based method for predicting compressive strength of concrete. Processes 2023;11:390. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020390.10.3390/pr11020390 ↗
89. Chopra, P, Sharma, RK, Kumar, M, Chopra, T. Comparison of machine learning techniques for the prediction of compressive strength of concrete. Adv Civ Eng 2018;2018:5481705. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5481705.10.1155/2018/5481705 ↗
90. Liu, W, Liu, G, Zhu, X. Applicability of machine learning algorithms in predicting chloride diffusion in concrete: modeling, evaluation, and feature analysis. Case Stud Constr Mater 2024;21:e03573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03573.10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03573 ↗
91. Al-Shamasneh, AR, Mahmoodzadeh, A, Karim, FK, Saidani, T, Alghamdi, A, Alnahas, J, et al.. Application of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of steel fiber reinforced concrete. Sci Rep 2025;15:30674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16516-1.10.1038/s41598-025-16516-1 ↗
92. Zhao, Y, Qin, P, Wang, Z. Multi-objective optimization and machine learning techniques for predicting early-age shrinkage in ultra-high-performance concrete. Mater Today Commun 2025;47:112925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112925.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112925 ↗
93. Sun, Y. Explainable prediction of compressive strength and elastic modulus for concrete containing waste foundry sand using Bayesian-optimized XGBoost with 10-fold cross-validation. J Sustain Metall 2024;10:335–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-024-00790-w.10.1007/s40831-024-00790-w ↗
94. Ali, YA, Awwad, EM, Al-Razgan, M, Maarouf, A. Hyperparameter search for machine learning algorithms for optimizing the computational complexity. Processes 2023;11:349. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020349.10.3390/pr11020349 ↗
95. Kern, C, Klausch, T, Kreuter, F. Tree-based machine learning methods for survey research. Surv Res Method 2019;13:73–93.
96. Kruse, R, Mostaghim, S, Borgelt, C, Braune, C, Steinbrecher, M. Multi-layer perceptrons. In: Computational intelligence: a methodological introduction. Cham: Springer; 2022:53–124 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-42227-1_5 ↗
97. Lundberg, SM, Lee, S-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2017;30.
98. Friedman, JH. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 2001:1189–232.10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
99. Christoph, M. Interpretable machine learning: a guide for making black box models explainable. Morrisville, North Carolina: Lulu.com; 2020. https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/ [Accessed 21 May 2026].
100. Habert, G, Miller, SA, John, VM, Provis, JL, Favier, A, Horvath, A, et al.. Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nat Rev Earth Environ 2020;1:559–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0093-3.10.1038/s43017-020-0093-3 ↗