Comparative analysis of test methods for identifying alkali–silica reactivity in concrete aggregates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The alkali–silica reaction (ASR) poses a serious threat to the durability and structural integrity of concrete infrastructure worldwide. This study critically evaluates the effectiveness of ASTM C227 and ASTM C1260 standards in determining the ASR potential of five locally sourced aggregate samples, including Kuchlack, Jabal-e-Noor, Hanna, Speyzaind, and Bolan. Physical and chemical characterization, alongside petrographic analysis, were conducted to identify reactive components within the aggregates. Mortar bar expansion tests were performed under both ASTM protocols to assess elongation and determine reactivity. The findings strongly affirm that ASTM C1260 is more effective than ASTM C227 in identifying potentially deleterious aggregates. While all samples remained within acceptable expansion limits under ASTM C227, the Sepyzaind aggregate demonstrated excessive expansion under ASTM C1260, confirming its slow-reactive nature. This was further verified by a marked reduction in compressive strength (16 %) and modulus of rupture (9.3 %) for Sepyzaind aggregate under ASTM C1260 conditions. The remaining four aggregates consistently tested non-reactive across all parameters. These results emphasize the superior diagnostic capability of ASTM C1260 and underscore the necessity for rigorous ASR evaluation, especially in regions that depend on local aggregate sources. This study offers critical insights for engineers, researchers, and policymakers committed to enhancing the long-term performance and safety of concrete structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering , University of Engineering and Technology , Lahore , Pakistan
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering , College of Engineering, King Faisal University , Al-Ahsa , 31982 , Saudi Arabia
Department of Civil Engineering , College of Engineering in Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University , 11942 , Kharj , Saudi Arabia
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering , King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals , Dhahran , Saudi Arabia
Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Construction and Building Materials, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals , Dhahran , Saudi Arabia
Funding
Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. Stanton, TE. Expansion of concrete through reaction between cement and aggregates. Proc Am Soc Civ Eng 1940;66:1781–811.
2. Zhang, W, Du, H, Pang, SD. The alkali–silica reaction of seawater-mixed mortar. J. Sustain. Cement-Based Mater 2024;13:1079–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2024.2348127.10.1080/21650373.2024.2348127 ↗
3. Clayton, DA, Santos-Villalobos, H, Ezell, NDB, Clayton, J, Baba, J. Automated detection of alkali-silica reaction in concrete using linear array ultrasound data. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on environmental degradation of materials in nuclear power systems – water reactors; 2018:1335–45 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-04639-2_87 ↗
4. Dip, B, Rui, H, N, L, Yining, F. Mitigation mechanisms of alkali-silica reaction through the incorporation of colloidal nano-SiO2 in accelerated mortar bar testing. Constr Build Mater 2024;422:135834.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135834 ↗
5. Figueira, RB, Sousa, R, Coelho, L, Azenha, M, de Almeida, JM, Jorge, PAS, et al.. Alkali–silica reaction in concrete: mechanisms, mitigation and test methods. Constr Build Mater 2019;222:903–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.230.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.230 ↗
6. Vacher, M, Jacobsen, S. Empirical modelling of lithium mitigation for alkali-silica reactivity. Nord Concr Res 2022;67:1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/ncr-2022-0003.10.2478/ncr-2022-0003 ↗
7. Venkatachalam, S, Raja, K, Vishnuvardhan, K, Suchithra, S, Maniarasan, SK, Saravanan, MM, et al.. The ASR mechanism in concrete and the influence of lithium in mitigating it: a critical review. Mater Today Proc 2022;65:A1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.327.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.327 ↗
8. Leemann, A, Góra, M, Lothenbach, B, Heuberger, M. Alkali silica reaction in concrete – revealing the expansion mechanism by surface force measurements. Cement Concr Res 2024;176:107392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107392.10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107392 ↗
9. Ma, P, Liao, W, Zhuo, Y, Ma, H, Zhu, Y, Chen, G. Characterization of alkali-silica reaction products and C-S-H using SWIR spectroscopy for nondestructive detection of ASR. Constr Build Mater 2024;416:135207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135207.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135207 ↗
10. Fanijo, EO, Kolawole, JT, Almakrab, A. Alkali–silica reaction (ASR) in concrete structures: mechanisms, effects and evaluation test methods adopted in the United States. Case Stud Constr Mater 2021;15:e00563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00563.10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00563 ↗
11. Giaccio, G, Torrijos, MC, Milanesi, C, Zerbino, R. Alkali–silica reaction in plain and fiber concretes in field conditions. Mater Struct 2019;52:31. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1332-2.10.1617/s11527-019-1332-2 ↗
12. Hajighasemali, S, Ramezanianpour, AA, Lotfi, V, Kashefizadeh, MH. Investigation of the effect of alkali-silica reaction on the structural behavior of reinforced concrete beams using the finite element method. Amirkabir J Civil Eng 2017;49:23–34.
13. Przondziono, R, Breitenbücher, R. Degradation in pavement concretes – effects of cyclic loading on fluid transport processes and ASR. In: Proceedings of the international conference on concrete pavements; 2025.10.33593/iccp.v11i1.314 ↗
14. Aligolnia, H, Yousefpour, H. Effect of alkali silica reaction on pretensioned concrete bridge girders. Struct Concr 2025;26:2067–85.10.1002/suco.202400382 ↗
15. Behravan, A, Arce, G, Ozyildirim, HC, Spradley, E, Davenport, C. Repair and treatment of alkali-silica reaction (ASR)-affected transportation infrastructures: review and interview. Infrastructure 2025;10:101. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures10040101.10.3390/infrastructures10040101 ↗
16. Mathur, P, Gupta, AB. Evaluating residual strength of RCC tanks affected by ASR using NDT methods. Int Res J Adv Eng Hub 2024;2:1355–60. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjaeh.2024.0187.10.47392/IRJAEH.2024.0187 ↗
17. Jensen, V. The elgeseter bridge: an example of ASR damage in Norway. Nord Concr Res 2004;32:101–8.
18. Fava, R, Larbi, JA, Plowman, M. Alkali-aggregate reaction in Argentinian concrete. Cement Concr Res 1991;21:556–62.
19. Takemura, T, Koyanagi, W, Torii, K. Study on the alkali-silica reaction of concrete structures in Japan. J Japan Soc Civil Eng 1996;23:312–20.
20. Siemes, AJM, Visser, JHM, Nijland, TG. ASR in concrete structures: a survey of damaged bridges in the Netherlands. Cement Concr Res 2002;32:1023–31.
21. Oberholster, RE. Case studies of the practical and economical impact of alkali-silica reaction in South Africa. In: Proceedings of the 10th International conference on alkali–aggregate reaction; 2001.
22. American Concrete Institute (ACI). 221: Guide for use of normal weight aggregate in concrete. Farmington Hills (MI): ACI; 2001.
23. Kazemi, P, Nikudel, MR, Khamehchiyan, M, Giri, P, Taheri, S, Clark, SM. Assessment of alkali–silica reaction potential in aggregates from Iran and Australia using thin-section petrography and expansion testing. Materials 2022;15:4289. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124289.10.3390/ma15124289 ↗
24. Antolik, A, Dąbrowski, M, Jóźwiak-Niedźwiedzka, D. Petrographic evaluation of aggregate from igneous rocks: Alkali–silica reaction potential. Minerals 2023;13:1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13081004.10.3390/min13081004 ↗
25. De Souza, DJ, Sanchez, LFM. Evaluating the efficiency of SCMs to avoid or mitigate ASR-induced expansion and deterioration through a multi-level assessment. Cement Concr Res 2023;173:107262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107262.10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107262 ↗
26. Tapas, MJ, Thomas, P, Vessalas, K, Sirivivatnanon, V. Mechanisms of alkali–silica reaction mitigation in AMBT conditions: comparative study of traditional supplementary cementitious materials. J Mater Civ Eng 2022;34:e04022009.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004097 ↗
27. Liu, Z, Shi, C, Shi, Q, Tan, X, Meng, W. Recycling waste glass aggregate in concrete: mitigation of alkali–silica reaction by carbonation curing. J Clean Prod 2022;370:133507.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133545 ↗
28. Gökşen, Y, Durak, U, İlkentapar, S, Atabey, İ, Kaya, M, Karahan, O, et al.. Synergistic effect of waste glass powder and fly ash on properties of mortar and suppression of alkali–silica reaction. Revista de la Construcción 2023;22:115–28.10.7764/RDLC.22.2.419 ↗
29. Almakrab, A, Elshazli, MT, Ibrahim, A, Khalifa, YA. Assessment of various mitigation strategies of alkali–silica reactions in concrete using accelerated mortar test. Materials 2024;17:7104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17205124.10.3390/ma17205124 ↗
30. Kaladharan, G, Szeles, T, Stoffels, SM, Rajabipour, F. Novel admixtures for mitigation of alkali–silica reaction in concrete. Cement Concr Compos 2021;120:104061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104028.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104028 ↗
31. Malone, C, Sun, H, Zhu, J. Nonlinear impact-echo test for quantitative evaluation of ASR damage in concrete. J Nondestruct Eval 2023;42:93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-023-01003-2.10.1007/s10921-023-01003-2 ↗
32. Mostafa, J, Anol, M. A novel multiscale modelling approach for evaluation of the ASR in concrete structures. In: Sixth international conference on durability of concrete structures, Leeds: University of Leeds; 2019.
33. Saouma, VE, Hariri-Ardebili, MA. Integrative experimental and numerical study of ASR-affected nuclear concrete containments. Mater Struct 2020;53:3. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1433-y.10.1617/s11527-019-1433-y ↗
34. Matteini, I, Noyce, P, Crevello, G. ASR: practical investigative techniques and field monitoring systems used to assess ASR for service life modeling. In: MATEC web of conferences; 2019.10.1051/matecconf/201928908004 ↗
35. Doğruyol, M Determination of ASR in concrete using characterization methods. Buildings 2024;14:657, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030657.10.3390/buildings14030657 ↗
36. Ai, L, Soltangharaei, V, Ziehl, P. Evaluation of ASR in concrete using acoustic emission and deep learning. Nucl Eng Des 2021;380:111328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111328.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111328 ↗
37. Hossain, MT, Giannini, ER, Tanner, JE. Using autoclave concrete prism testing to evaluate ASR reactivity in concrete using laboratory tests and outdoor exposure blocks as benchmark data. Adv Civil Eng Mater 2024;13:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1520/acem20220089.10.1520/ACEM20220089 ↗
38. ASTM International. C1260: standard test method for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates (mortar-bar method). West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2014.
39. ASTM International. C227: standard test method for potential alkali reactivity of cement–aggregate combinations (mortar-bar method). West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2010.
40. ASTM International. C127: standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2015.
41. ASTM International. C29: standard test method for bulk density (unit weight) and voids in aggregate. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2016.
42. British Standards Institution (BSI). BS 812-112: testing aggregates – method for determination of aggregate impact value (AIV). London (UK): BSI; 2014.
43. British Standards Institution (BSI). BS 812-110: testing aggregates – methods for determination of aggregate crushing value (ACV). London (UK): BSI; 2014.
44. ASTM International. C535: standard test method for resistance to degradation of large-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2016.
45. ASTM International. C295: standard guide for petrographic examination of aggregates for concrete. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2012.
46. ASTM International. C187: standard test method for amount of water required for normal consistency of hydraulic cement paste. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2011.
47. ASTM International. C191: standard test methods for time of setting of hydraulic cement by vicat needle. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2013.
48. ASTM International. C151: standard test method for autoclave expansion of hydraulic cement. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2015.
49. ASTM International. C184: standard test method for fineness of hydraulic cement by the 150-µm (no. 100) and 75-µm (no. 200) sieves. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 1994.
50. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 196-3: methods of testing cement – part 3: determination of setting time and soundness. Brussels (Belgium): CEN; 2005.
51. ASTM International. C204: standard test methods for fineness of hydraulic cement by air-permeability apparatus. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2016.
52. ASTM International. C114: standard test methods for chemical analysis of hydraulic cement. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2015.
53. Johansen, V, Idorn, GM. Cement production and cement quality. In: Skalny, J, editor. Materials Science of Concrete I. Westerville (OH): The American Ceramic Society; 1989:27–71 pp.
54. Siddiqi, ZA, Hameed, R, Saleem, M, Khan, QS, Ishaq, I. Performance study of locally available coarse aggregates of Azad Kashmir. Pakistan J Sci 2013;65. (issue/pages not clearly specified).
55. Broekmans, MATM. Classification of the alkali–silica reaction in geochemical terms of silica dissolution. In: 7th Euro-Seminar on Microscopy Applied to Building Materials. Netherlands: Delft; 1999:155–70 pp.
56. Islam, MS. Performance of Nevada’s aggregates in alkali-aggregate reactivity of Portland cement concrete. Las Vegas (NV): University of Nevada; 2010.
57. Leming, ML, Mitchell, JF, Johnson, JK, Ahmad, SH. Investigation of alkali–silica reactivity. In: North Carolina highway structures. Raleigh (NC); North Carolina State : University; 1996.
58. Dunham, RJ. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional textures. In: Classification of Carbonate Rocks. Tulsa (OK): American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir; 1962:108–21 pp.10.1306/M1357 ↗
59. Magni, R, Rogers, C, Grattan-Bellew, P. The influence of the alkali–silica reaction on structures in the vicinity of sudbury, Ontario. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on alkali–aggregate reaction. Park Ridge (NJ): Noyes Publications; 1986. p. 17–21.
60. Borge, JW. Alkali–aggregate reactions in concrete: properties, classification and testing of Norwegian cataclastic rocks. In: Trondheim (Norway): Norwegian institute of technology. University of Trondheim; 1995.
61. ASTM International. C33: standard specification for concrete aggregates. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2016.
62. ASTM International. C305: standard practice for mechanical mixing of hydraulic cement pastes and mortars of plastic consistency. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2014.
63. ASTM International. C1437: standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2015.
64. ASTM International. C490: standard practice for use of apparatus for the determination of length change of hardened cement paste, mortar, and concrete. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2011.
65. ASTM International. C348: standard test method for flexural strength of hydraulic-cement mortar. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2014.
66. ASTM International. C109: standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic-cement mortars (using 2-in. or 50-mm cube specimens). West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2016.
67. ASTM International. C1293: standard test method for concrete aggregates by determination of length change of concrete due to alkali–silica reaction. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2015.
68. Stark, D, Morgan, B, Okamoto, P. Eliminating or minimizing alkali–silica reactivity. Washington (DC). Strategic Highway Research Program 1993.
69. Davies, G, Oberholster, RE. An interlaboratory test programme on the NBRI accelerated test to determine the alkali-reactivity of aggregates. Pretoria (South Africa): National Building Research Institute; 1987.
70. Hooton, D. Inter-laboratory study of the NBRI rapid test method and CSA standardization status. Toronto (ON): University of Toronto; 1990.
71. Sivrikaya, B, Demir, İ, Sevim, Ö. Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. Challenge J Struct Mech 2020;6:68–76. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003.10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003 ↗
72. Fournier, B, Bérubé, MA. Alkali–aggregate reaction in concrete: a review of basic concepts and engineering implications. Can J Civ Eng 2000;27:167–91. https://doi.org/10.1139/l99-072.10.1139/l99-072 ↗
73. American Concrete Institute (ACI). Aci 201.2R-16: guide to durable concrete. Farmington Hills (MI): ACI; 2016.
74. Marzouk, H, Langdon, S. The effect of alkali-aggregate reactivity on the mechanical properties of high and normal strength concrete. Cement Concr Compos 2003;25:549–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-9465(02)00094-x.10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00094-X ↗
75. Munir, MJ, Abbas, S, Qazi, AU, Nehdi, ML, Kazmi, SMS. Role of test method in detection of alkali–silica reactivity of concrete aggregates. Proc Inst Civ Eng Constr Mater 2018;171:203–21. https://doi.org/10.1680/jcoma.16.00058.10.1680/jcoma.16.00058 ↗
76. Pachel, CEC, Tanner, JE. Alkali–silica reaction and its effects on the splitting tensile strength and direct compressive strength of mortar bars. J Test Eval 2023;51:2715–29. https://doi.org/10.1520/jte20220275.10.1520/JTE20220275 ↗
77. Abbas, S, Hussain, I, Aslam, F, Ahmed, A, Gillani, SAA, Shabbir, A, et al.. Potential of alkali–silica reactivity of unexplored local aggregates as per ASTM C1260. Materials 2022;15:6627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196627.10.3390/ma15196627 ↗