journal article·2025-06-17Open access

Evaluating the use of recycled sawdust in porous foam mortar for improved performance

Md Azree Othuman Mydin, Paul O. Awoyera, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah, Kennedy Onyelowe, Yasin Onuralp Özkılıç

Abstract

Abstract The disposal of sawdust, a major byproduct of the timber and woodworking industries, presents a growing environmental concern due to its large volume and limited reuse options. Finding sustainable and rational approaches to repurpose this lignocellulosic waste is essential to reduce its environmental footprint. In this study, recycled sawdust was investigated as a partial replacement for fine sand in the production of porous foam mortar (FM), aiming to develop lightweight, eco-friendly construction materials. The experimental tests were focused on the physical (slump flow, setting time, density), mechanical (compression, flexural, splitting tensile, modulus of elasticity), durability (water absorption, porosity, permeability), and microstructural characteristics of the mortars. The FM mixes were produced using sawdust substitutes ranging from 0 to 25% by weight of fine sand. With a 25% substitution, the compressive strength dropped by 33.7%, from 9.8 MPa for the control mix (0% sawdust) to 6.5 MPa. Durability tests indicated a linear increase in water absorption and porosity with higher sawdust content. Despite these reductions, mixes with up to 15% sawdust substitution maintained acceptable mechanical and durability performance, demonstrating potential for non-structural applications. Further optimization of mix designs is suggested to improve performance characteristics, and this study emphasizes the dual benefits of reusing sawdust waste and encouraging sustainable construction methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia , 11800, Penang , Malaysia

Department of Civil Engineering, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University , Al Khobar , Saudi Arabia

Geopolymer and Green Technology, Centre of Excellence, Universiti Malaysia Perlis , Perlis , Malaysia

Faculty of Chemical Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis , Perlis , Malaysia

Department of Civil Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture , Umudike , 440109, Umuahia , Nigeria

Department of Civil Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University , 42090 , Konya , Turkey

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Miller, S. A., G. Habert, R. J. Myers, and J. T. Harvey. Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the cement industry via value chain mitigation strategies. One Earth, Vol. 4, 2021, pp. 1398–1411.10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.011 ↗
2. Kuoribo, E., H. Shokry, and H. Mahmoud. Attaining material circularity in recycled construction waste to produce sustainable concrete blocks for residential building applications. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 96, 2024, id. 110503.10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110503 ↗
3. Adegoke, K. A., O. O. Adesina, O. A. Okon-Akan, O. R. Adegoke, A. B. Olabintan, O. A. Ajala, et al. Sawdust-biomass based materials for sequestration of organic and inorganic pollutants and potential for engineering applications. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, Vol. 5, 2022, id. 100274.10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100274 ↗
4. Szczurek, A., M. Maciejewska, Ż. Zajiczek, and K. Mościcki. Detection of emissions from the combustion of wood-based materials being furniture industry waste. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Vol. 12, 2021, pp. 375–385.10.1016/j.apr.2020.11.018 ↗
5. Osman, N., R. A. Karim, H. T. Othman, and M. A. Firdaus Mazlan. Biomass in Malaysia: Forestry-based residues. International Journal of Biomass and Renewables, Vol. 3, 2014, id. 7.10.61762/ijbrvol3iss1art13872 ↗
6. Abdulhameed, A. A., M. M. Hason, A. A. K. Sharba, A. N. Hanoon, M. Amran, H. M. Magbool, et al. Experimental and environmental investigations of the impacts of wood sawdust on the performance of reinforced concrete composite beams. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 19, 2023, id. e02550.10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02550 ↗
7. Priya, E., P. Vasanthi, B. Prabhu, and P. Murugesan. Sawdust as a sustainable additive: Comparative insights into its role in concrete and brick applications. Cleaner Waste Systems, Vol. 11, 2025, id. 100286.10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100286 ↗
8. Olaiya, B. C., M. M. Lawan, and K. A. Olonad. Utilization of sawdust composites in construction – A review. SN Applied Sciences, Vol. 5, 2023, id. 140.10.1007/s42452-023-05361-4 ↗
9. Özkan, İ. G. M., K. Aldemir, O. Alhasan, A. Benli, O. Y. Bayraktar, M. U. Yılmazoğlu, et al. Investigation on the sustainable use of different sizes of sawdust aggregates in eco-friendly foam concretes: Physico-mechanical, thermal insulation and durability characteristics. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 438, 2024, id. 137100.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137100 ↗
10. Batool, F., K. Islam, C. Cakiroglu, and A. Shahriar. Effectiveness of wood waste sawdust to produce medium- to low-strength concrete materials. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 44, 2021, id. 103237.10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103237 ↗
11. Cheng, Y., J. Liu, W. Wang, L. Jin, and S. Yan. Preparation and property study of sawdust-modified cement mortar. Frontiers in Materials, Vol. 11, 2024, id. 1457167.10.3389/fmats.2024.1457167 ↗
12. Liu, Y., Z. Zhao, M. N. Amin, B. Ahmed, K. Khan, S. U. Arifeen, et al. Foam concrete for lightweight construction applications: A comprehensive review of the research development and material characteristics. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2024, id. 20240022.10.1515/rams-2024-0022 ↗
13. Majeed, S. S. Formulating eco-friendly foamed mortar by incorporating sawdust ash as a partial cement replacement. Sustainability, Vol. 16, 2024, id. 2612.10.3390/su16072612 ↗
14. BS EN 197. Cement composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements, British Standards Institute, London, UK, 2011.
15. Park, S., J. O. Baker, M. E. Himmel, P. A. Parilla, and D. K. Johnson. Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 3, 2010, id. 10.10.1186/1754-6834-3-10 ↗
16. French, A. D. Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose, Vol. 21, 2014, pp. 885–896.10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
17. ASTM C230/C230M. Standard specification for flow table for use in tests of hydraulic cement; 2020.
18. BS EN 12350-6. Testing fresh concrete density; 2016.
19. BS EN 196 - Part 3. Methods of testing cement determination of setting times and soundness; 2016.
20. BS EN 12390-3. Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens, 2011.
21. BS EN 12390-5. Testing hardened concrete. Flexural strength of test specimens; 2019.
22. 12390-6 BS EN. Testing hardened concrete – part 6: Tensile splitting strength of test specimens; 2006.
23. ASTM C469. Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression; 2002.
24. BS EN 1881-122. Testing concrete method for determination of water absorption; 2020.
25. RILEM TC-14 CPC 11. Absorption of water by concrete by immersion under vacuum; 1984.
26. Cabrera, J. G. and C. J. Lynsdale. A new gas permeameter for measuring the permeability of mortar and concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 40, 1988, pp. 177–182.10.1680/macr.1988.40.144.177 ↗
27. ISO 16700. Microbeam analysis — Scanning electron microscopy — Guidelines for calibrating image magnification; 2016.
28. Gupta, S., A. Kashani, and A. H. Mahmood. Carbon sequestration in engineered lightweight foamed mortar – Effect on rheology, mechanical and durability properties. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 322, 2022, id. 126383.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126383 ↗
29. Ferede, E. Evaluation of mechanical and water absorption properties of alkaline-treated sawdust-reinforced polypropylene composite. Journal of Engineering, Vol. 2020, 2020, pp. 1–8.10.1155/2020/3706176 ↗
30. Aaron, G. H., M. A. O. Mydin, D. E. Tobbala, P. Jagadesh, Y. O. Özkılıç, S. D. Datta, et al. Experimental and machine learning approaches to investigate the properties of foamed concrete made with surkhi and dolomitic limestone as cement replacements. Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling Experiments and Design, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2025, id. 151.10.1007/s41939-025-00730-5 ↗
31. Waqar, A., M. B. Khan, T. Najeh, H. R. Almujibah, and O. Benjeddou. Performance-based engineering: formulating sustainable concrete with sawdust and steel fiber for superior mechanical properties. Frontiers in Materials, Vol. 11, 2024, id. 1428700.10.3389/fmats.2024.1428700 ↗
32. Maglad, A. M., M. A. O. Mydin, S. D. Datta, B. A., and Tayeh. Assessing the mechanical, durability, thermal and microstructural properties of sea shell ash based lightweight foamed concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 402, 2023, id. 133018.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133018 ↗
33. He, Y.-L. and T. Xie. Advances of thermal conductivity models of nanoscale silica aerogel insulation material. Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 81, 2015, pp. 28–50.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.02.013 ↗
34. Senadheera, S. S., S. Gupta, H. W. Kua, D. Hou, S. Kim, D. C. W. Tsang, et al. Application of biochar in concrete – A review. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 143, 2023, id. 105204.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105204 ↗
35. Tiegoum Wembe, J., L. L. Mambou Ngueyep, E. Elat, C. D. Fotseu Miyo, A. Hamadou, J.-M. B. Ndjaka, et al. Impact of the partial substitution of cement and sand by ash from several types of wood species in cementitious materials manufacture: valorization in the industrial field. Discover Civil Engineering, Vol. 1, 2024, id. 36.10.1007/s44290-024-00035-5 ↗
36. Golewski, G. L. The role of pozzolanic activity of siliceous fly ash in the formation of the structure of sustainable cementitious composites. Sustainable Chemistry, Vol. 3, 2022, pp. 520–534.10.3390/suschem3040032 ↗
37. Agarwal, S. K. Pozzolanic activity of various siliceous materials. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 36, 2006, pp. 1735–1739.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.025 ↗
38. Taylor, H. F. W. Cement chemistry, Thomas Telford Publishing, London, UK, 1997.
39. Chowdhury, S., A. Maniar, and O. M. Suganya. Strength development in concrete with wood ash blended cement and use of soft computing models to predict strength parameters. Journal of Advanced Research, Vol. 6, 2015, pp. 907–913.10.1016/j.jare.2014.08.006 ↗
40. Bodur, B., A. Benli, O. Y. Bayraktar, H. G. Alcan, G. Kaplan, and A. C. Aydın. Impact of attapulgite and basalt fiber additions on the performance of pumice-based foam concrete: Mechanical, thermal, and durability properties. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 25, 2025, id. 74.10.1007/s43452-025-01128-3 ↗
41. Gencel, O., O. Y. Bayraktar, G. Kaplan, O. Arslan, M. Nodehi, A. Benli, et al. Lightweight foam concrete containing expanded perlite and glass sand: Physico-mechanical, durability, and insulation properties. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 320, 2022, id. 126187.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126187 ↗