Tensile behavior evaluation of two-stage concrete using an innovative model optimization approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Two-stage concrete (TSC) is a sustainable material produced by incorporating coarse aggregates into formwork and filling the voids with a specially formulated grout mix. The significance of this study is to improve the predictive accuracy of TSC’s tensile strength, which is essential for optimizing its use in construction applications. To achieve this objective, novel and reliable predictive models were developed using advanced machine learning algorithms, including random forest (RF) and gene expression programming (GEP). The performance of these models was evaluated using important evaluation metrics, including the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error, and root mean square error (RMSE), after they were trained on a comprehensive dataset. The results suggest that the RF model outperforms the GEP model, as evidenced by a higher R 2 value of 0.94 relative to 0.91 for GEP and reduced MAE and RMSE error values. This suggests that the RF model has a superior predictive capability. Additionally, sensitivity analyses and SHapley Additive ExPlanation analysis revealed that the water-to-binder (W/B) ratio was the most influential input parameter, accounting for 51.01% of the predictive outcomes presented in the model. This research emphasizes optimizing TSC design, enhancing material performance, and promoting sustainable, cost-effective construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University , Al-Ahsa , 31982 , Saudi Arabia
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology , Gdańsk , Poland
Department of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad , Abbottabad , 22060 , Pakistan
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdelgader, H. S. Effect of the quantity of sand on the compressive strength of two-stage concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 48, 1996, pp. 353–360.10.1680/macr.1996.48.177.353 ↗
2. O’Malley, J. and H. S. Abdelgader. Investigation into viability of using two-stage (pre-placed aggregate) concrete in Irish setting. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, Vol. 4, 2010, pp. 127–132.10.1007/s11709-010-0007-4 ↗
3. Abdelgader, H. S. and J. Górski. Stress-strain relations and modulus of elasticity of two-stage concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, 2003, pp. 329–334.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:4(329) ↗
4. Bayer, R. İ. Use of preplaced aggregate concrete for mass concrete applications, Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University (Turkey), ProQuest, United States, 2004.
5. Fang, B., Z. Qian, Y. Song, X. Diao, T. Shi, X. Cai, et al. Evaluation of early crack resistance performance of concrete mixed with ternary minerals using temperature stress testing machine (TSTM). Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 465, 2024, id. 142780.10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142780 ↗
6. Abdelgader, H. S. How to design concrete produced by a two-stage concreting method. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 29, 1999, pp. 331–337.10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00215-4 ↗
7. Aprianti, E. A huge number of artificial waste material can be supplementary cementitious material (SCM) for concrete production – a review part II. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 142, 2017, pp. 4178–4194.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.115 ↗
8. Abdelgader, H. S., M. Kurpińska, and M. Amran. Effect of slag coal ash and foamed glass on the mechanical properties of two-stage concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 58, 2022, pp. 1091–1097.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.139 ↗
9. Chand, G., A. Kumar, and S. Ram. Comparative study of metakaolin, pumice powder and silica fume in producing treated sustainable recycled coarse aggregate concrete by adopting two-stage mixing. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, Vol. 9, 2022, id. 100528.10.1016/j.clet.2022.100528 ↗
10. Yu, Q., M. Monjezi, A. S. Mohammed, H. Dehghani, D. J. Armaghani, and D. V. Ulrikh. Optimized support vector machines combined with evolutionary random forest for prediction of back-break caused by blasting operation. Sustainability, Vol. 13, 2021, id. 12797.10.3390/su132212797 ↗
11. Lu, D., G. Wang, X. Du, and Y. Wang. A nonlinear dynamic uniaxial strength criterion that considers the ultimate dynamic strength of concrete. International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 103, 2017, pp. 124–137.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.011 ↗
12. Song, X., W. Wang, Y. Deng, Y. Su, F. Jia, Q. Zaheer, et al. Data-driven modeling for residual velocity of projectile penetrating reinforced concrete slabs. Engineering Structures, Vol. 306, 2024, id. 117761.10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117761 ↗
13. Fan, S., T. He, W. Li, C. Zeng, P. Chen, L. Chen, et al. Machine learning-based classification of quality grades for concrete vibration behaviour. Automation in Construction, Vol. 167, 2024, id. 105694.10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105694 ↗
14. Chithra, S., S. R. R. S. Kumar, K. Chinnaraju, and F. Alfin Ashmita. A comparative study on the compressive strength prediction models for High Performance Concrete containing nano silica and copper slag using regression analysis and artificial neural networks. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 114, 2016, pp. 528–535.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.214 ↗
15. Chou, J.-S., C.-F. Tsai, A.-D. Pham, and Y.-H. Lu. Machine learning in concrete strength simulations: Multi-nation data analytics. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 73, 2014, pp. 771–780.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.054 ↗
16. Farooq, F., W. Ahmed, A. Akbar, F. Aslam, and R. Alyousef. Predictive modeling for sustainable high-performance concrete from industrial wastes: A comparison and optimization of models using ensemble learners. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 292, 2021, id. 126032.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126032 ↗
17. Kazemi, F., N. Asgarkhani, and R. Jankowski. Machine learning-based seismic fragility and seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 166, 2023, id. 107761.10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107761 ↗
18. Ahmad, A., K. A. Ostrowski, M. Maślak, F. Farooq, I. Mehmood, and A. Nafees. Comparative study of supervised machine learning algorithms for predicting the compressive strength of concrete at high temperature. Materials, Vol. 14, 2021, id. 4222.10.3390/ma14154222 ↗
19. Erdal, H. I. Two-level and hybrid ensembles of decision trees for high performance concrete compressive strength prediction. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 26, 2013, pp. 1689–1697.10.1016/j.engappai.2013.03.014 ↗
20. Al-Shamiri, A. K., J. H. Kim, T.-F. Yuan, and Y. S. Yoon. Modeling the compressive strength of high-strength concrete: An extreme learning approach. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 208, 2019, pp. 204–219.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.165 ↗
21. Han, B., Y. Wu, and L. Liu. Prediction and uncertainty quantification of compressive strength of high‐strength concrete using optimized machine learning algorithms. Structural Concrete, Vol. 23, 2022, pp. 3772–3785.10.1002/suco.202100732 ↗
22. Golafshani, E. M. and A. Behnood. Application of soft computing methods for predicting the elastic modulus of recycled aggregate concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 176, 2018, pp. 1163–1176.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.186 ↗
23. Ribeiro, M. H. D. M. and L. dos Santos Coelho. Ensemble approach based on bagging, boosting and stacking for short-term prediction in agribusiness time series. Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 86, 2020, id. 105837.10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105837 ↗
24. Dabiri, H., M. Kioumarsi, A. Kheyroddin, A. Kandiri, and F. Sartipi. Compressive strength of concrete with recycled aggregate; a machine learning-based evaluation. Cleaner Materials, Vol. 3, 2022, id. 100044.10.1016/j.clema.2022.100044 ↗
25. Iftikhar, B., S. C. Alih, M. Vafaei, M. A. Elkotb, M. Shutaywi, M. F. Javed, et al. Predictive modeling of compressive strength of sustainable rice husk ash concrete: Ensemble learner optimization and comparison. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 348, 2022, id. 131285.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131285 ↗
26. Kaveh, A., T. Bakhshpoori, and S. M. Hamze-Ziabari. M5’and Mars based prediction models for properties of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, Vol. 62, 2018, pp. 281–294.10.3311/PPci.10799 ↗
27. Alghamdi, S. J. Classifying high strength concrete mix design methods using decision trees. Materials, Vol. 15, 2022, id. 1950.10.3390/ma15051950 ↗
28. Asif, U., S. A. Memon, M. F. Javed, and J. Kim. Predictive modeling and experimental validation for assessing the mechanical properties of cementitious composites made with silica fume and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Buildings, Vol. 14, 2024, id. 1091.10.3390/buildings14041091 ↗
29. Asif, U., M. F. Javed, M. Abuhussain, M. Ali, W. A. Khan, and A. Mohamed. Predicting the mechanical properties of plastic concrete: An optimization method by using genetic programming and ensemble learners. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 20, 2024, id. e03135.10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03135 ↗
30. Utkarsh and P. K. Jain. Predicting bentonite swelling pressure: optimized XGBoost versus neural networks. Scientific Reports, Vol. 14, 2024, id. 17533.10.1038/s41598-024-68038-x ↗
31. Argalis, P. P., M. Sinka, M. Andzs, A. Korjakins, and D. Bajare. Development of new bio-based building materials by utilising manufacturing waste. Environmental and Climate Technologies, Vol. 28, 2024, pp. 58–70.10.2478/rtuect-2024-0006 ↗
32. Nabipour, M., P. Nayyeri, H. Jabani, S. Shahab, and A. Mosavi. Predicting stock market trends using machine learning and deep learning algorithms via continuous and binary data; a comparative analysis. IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 2020, pp. 150199–150212.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3015966 ↗
33. Sun, L., C. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Yang, C. Li, and P. Qiao. Experimental investigation on the bond performance of sea sand coral concrete with FRP bar reinforcement for marine environments. Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 26, 2022, pp. 533–546.10.1177/13694332221131153 ↗
34. Jiang, W., Y. Xie, W. Li, J. Wu, and G. Long. Prediction of the splitting tensile strength of the bonding interface by combining the support vector machine with the particle swarm optimization algorithm. Engineering Structures, Vol. 230, 2021, id. 111696.10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111696 ↗
35. Ray, S., M. M. Rahman, M. Haque, M. W. Hasan, and M. M. Alam. Performance evaluation of SVM and GBM in predicting compressive and splitting tensile strength of concrete prepared with ceramic waste and nylon fiber. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, Vol. 35, 2023, pp. 92–100.10.1016/j.jksues.2021.02.009 ↗
36. Khan, M. I. Predicting properties of high performance concrete containing composite cementitious materials using artificial neural networks. Automation in Construction, Vol. 22, 2012, pp. 516–524.10.1016/j.autcon.2011.11.011 ↗
37. Shu, J., X. Zhang, W. Li, Z. Zeng, H. Zhang, and Y. Duan. Point cloud and machine learning-based automated recognition and measurement of corrugated pipes and rebars for large precast concrete beams. Automation in Construction, Vol. 165, 2024, id. 105493.10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105493 ↗
38. Utkarsh, B. Ahmed, and P. K. Jain. Numerical analysis on structural behaviour of concrete-filled steel tubular columns. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Civil Infrastructure and Construction Materials (CICM 2023), Vol. 1, Cham, 2024, pp. 151–159.10.1007/978-3-031-63276-1_16 ↗
39. Yang, L. and A. Shami. On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: Theory and practice. Neurocomputing, Vol. 415, 2020, pp. 295–316.10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.061 ↗
40. Bui, D.-K., T. Nguyen, J.-S. Chou, H. Nguyen-Xuan, and T. D. Ngo. A modified firefly algorithm-artificial neural network expert system for predicting compressive and tensile strength of high-performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 180, 2018, pp. 320–333.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.201 ↗
41. Nguyen, M.-S. T., M.-C. Trinh, and S.-E. Kim. Uncertainty quantification of ultimate compressive strength of CCFST columns using hybrid machine learning model. Engineering with Computers, Vol. 38, 2022, pp. 2719–2738.10.1007/s00366-021-01339-1 ↗
42. Wu, Y. and S. Li. Damage degree evaluation of masonry using optimized SVM-based acoustic emission monitoring and rate process theory. Measurement, Vol. 190, 2022, id. 110729.10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110729 ↗
43. Urkude, N., M. S. Hora, and Utkarsh. Enhancing machine learning models with metaheuristic Optimization techniques for accurate prediction of PSC in FRP-reinforced concrete slabs. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2024, pp. 1–17.10.1080/15376494.2024.2394985 ↗
44. Shang, M., H. Li, A. Ahmad, W. Ahmad, K. A. Ostrowski, F. Aslam, et al. Predicting the mechanical properties of RCA-based concrete using supervised machine learning algorithms. Materials, Vol. 15, 2022, id. 647. 10.3390/ma15020647.10.3390/ma15020647 ↗
45. Shahmansouri, A. A., H. A. Bengar, and S. Ghanbari. Compressive strength prediction of eco-efficient GGBS-based geopolymer concrete using GEP method. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 31, 2020, id. 101326.10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101326 ↗
46. Sathyan, D., K. B. Anand, A. J. Prakash, and B. Premjith. Modeling the fresh and hardened stage properties of self-compacting concrete using random kitchen sink algorithm. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, Vol. 12, 2018, id. 24.10.1186/s40069-018-0246-7 ↗
47. Shahmansouri, A. A., H. A. Bengar, and E. Jahani. Predicting compressive strength and electrical resistivity of eco-friendly concrete containing natural zeolite via GEP algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 229, 2019, id. 116883.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116883 ↗
48. Vakhshouri, B. and S. Nejadi. Prediction of compressive strength of self-compacting concrete by ANFIS models. Neurocomputing, Vol. 280, 2018, pp. 13–22.10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.099 ↗
49. Aslam, F., F. Farooq, M. N. Amin, K. Khan, A. Waheed, A. Akbar, et al. Applications of gene expression programming for estimating compressive strength of high-strength concrete. Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2020, 2020, id. 8850535.10.1155/2020/8850535 ↗
50. Abu Yaman, M., M. Abd Elaty, and M. Taman. Predicting the ingredients of self compacting concrete using artificial neural network. Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol. 56, 2017, pp. 523–532.10.1016/j.aej.2017.04.007 ↗
51. Nematzadeh, M., A. A. Shahmansouri, and M. Fakoor. Post-fire compressive strength of recycled PET aggregate concrete reinforced with steel fibers: Optimization and prediction via RSM and GEP. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 252, 2020, id. 119057.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119057 ↗
52. Selvaraj, S. and S. Sivaraman. Prediction model for optimized self-compacting concrete with fly ash using response surface method based on fuzzy classification. Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 31, 2019, pp. 1365–1373.10.1007/s00521-018-3575-1 ↗
53. Belalia Douma, O., B. Boukhatem, M. Ghrici, and A. Tagnit-Hamou. Prediction of properties of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural network. Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 28, 2017, pp. 707–718.10.1007/s00521-016-2368-7 ↗
54. Balf, F. R., H. M. Kordkheili, and A. M. Kordkheili. A new method for predicting the ingredients of self-compacting concrete (SCC) including fly ash (FA) using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 46, 2021, pp. 4439–4460.10.1007/s13369-020-04927-3 ↗
55. Saha, P., P. Debnath, and P. Thomas. Prediction of fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete using support vector regression approach. Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 32, 2020, pp. 7995–8010.10.1007/s00521-019-04267-w ↗
56. Zhang, J., G. Ma, Y. Huang, J. sun, F. Aslani, and B. Nener. Modelling uniaxial compressive strength of lightweight self-compacting concrete using random forest regression. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 210, 2019, pp. 713–719.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.189 ↗
57. Amin, M. N., A. Ahmad, K. Khan, W. Ahmad, S. Nazar, M. I. Faraz, et al. Split tensile strength prediction of recycled aggregate-based sustainable concrete using artificial intelligence methods. Materials, Vol. 15, 2022, id. 4296.10.3390/ma15124296 ↗
58. Jiang, H., A. S. Mohammed, R. A. Kazeroon, and P. Sarir. Use of the gene-expression programming equation and FEM for the high-strength CFST columns. Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, 2021, id. 10468.10.3390/app112110468 ↗
59. He, B., S. H. Lai, A. S. Mohammed, M. M. Sabri, and D. V. Ulrikh. Estimation of blast-induced peak particle velocity through the improved weighted random forest technique. Applied Sciences, Vol. 12, 2022, id. 5019.10.3390/app12105019 ↗
60. Ferreira, C. Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2001, pp. 87–129.
61. Breiman, L. Random forests. Machine Learning, Vol. 45, 2001, pp. 5–32.10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
62. Moaf, F. O., F. Kazemi, H. S. Abdelgader, and M. Kurpińska. Machine learning-based prediction of preplaced aggregate concrete characteristics. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 123, 2023, id. 106387.10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106387 ↗
63. Rajabi, A. M., F. Omidi Moaf, and H. S. Abdelgader. Evaluation of mechanical properties of two-stage concrete and conventional concrete using nondestructive tests. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 32, 2020, id. 04020185.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003247 ↗
64. Qureshi, H. J., M. Alyami, R. Nawaz, I. Y. Hakeem, F. Aslam, B. Iftikhar, et al. Prediction of compressive strength of two-stage (preplaced aggregate) concrete using gene expression programming and random forest. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 19, 2023, id. e02581.10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02581 ↗
65. Wilson, S. W. Classifier conditions using gene expression programming. In International workshop on learning classifier systems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 206–217.10.1007/978-3-540-88138-4_12 ↗
66. Ferreira, C. Gene expression programming in problem solving. In Soft computing and industry: recent applications, Roy, R., M. Köppen, S. Ovaska, T. Furuhashi, F. Hoffmann, eds., Springer London, London, 2002, pp. 635–653.10.1007/978-1-4471-0123-9_54 ↗
67. Sarıdemir, M. Genetic programming approach for prediction of compressive strength of concretes containing rice husk ash. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 24, 2010, pp. 1911–1919.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.011 ↗
68. Guven, A. and M. Gunal. Genetic programming approach for prediction of local scour downstream of hydraulic structures. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 134, 2008, pp. 241–249.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(241) ↗
69. Ferreira, C. Gene expression programming: mathematical modeling by an artificial intelligence, Vol. 21, Springer, New York, USA, 2006.10.1007/3-540-32498-4_2 ↗
70. Khawaja, L., M. F. Javed, U. Asif, L. Alkhattabi, B. Ahmed, and H. Alabduljabbar. Indirect estimation of resilient modulus (Mr) of subgrade soil: Gene expression programming vs multi expression programming. Structures, Vol. 66, 2024, id. 106837.10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106837 ↗
71. Iftikhar, B., S. C. Alih, M. Vafaei, M. F. Javed, M. F. Rehman, S. S. Abdullaev, et al. Predicting compressive strength of eco-friendly plastic sand paver blocks using gene expression and artificial intelligence programming. Scientific Reports, Vol. 13, 2023, id. 12149.10.1038/s41598-023-39349-2 ↗
72. Han, Q., C. Gui, J. Xu, and G. Lacidogna. A generalized method to predict the compressive strength of high-performance concrete by improved random forest algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 226, 2019, pp. 734–742.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.315 ↗
73. Li, X., K. Li, S. Shen, and Y. Tian. Exploring time series models for wind speed forecasting: a comparative analysis. Energies, Vol. 16, 2023, id. 7785.10.3390/en16237785 ↗
74. Tuyan, M., L. V. Zhang, and M. L. Nehdi. Development of sustainable preplaced aggregate concrete with alkali-activated slag grout. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 263, 2020, id. 120227.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120227 ↗
75. Mohammadhosseini, H., M. M. Tahir, A. Alaskar, H. Alabduljabbar, and R. Alyousef. Enhancement of strength and transport properties of a novel preplaced aggregate fiber reinforced concrete by adding waste polypropylene carpet fibers. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 27, 2020, id. 101003.10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101003 ↗
76. Lv, J., T. Zhou, and K. Li. Development and investigation of a new low-cement-consumption concrete – Preplaced aggregate concrete. Sustainability, Vol. 12, 2020, id. 1080.10.3390/su12031080 ↗
77. Das, K. K. Development of high-performance preplaced aggregate concrete, Pao Yue-kong Library, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 2022.
78. Najjar, M. F., A. M. Soliman, and M. L. Nehdi. Critical overview of two-stage concrete: Properties and applications. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 62, 2014, pp. 47–58.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.021 ↗
79. Coo, M. and T. Pheeraphan. Effect of sand, fly ash and limestone powder on preplaced aggregate concrete mechanical properties and reinforced beam shear capacity. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 120, 2016, pp. 581–592.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.128 ↗
80. Coo, M. and T. Pheeraphan. Effect of sand, fly ash, and coarse aggregate gradation on preplaced aggregate concrete studied through factorial design. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 93, 2015, pp. 812–821.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.086 ↗
81. Abdelgader, H. S. and A. A. Elgalhud. Effect of grout proportions on strength of two-stage concrete. Structural Concrete, Vol. 9, 2008, pp. 163–170.10.1680/stco.2008.9.3.163 ↗
82. Prasad, N. and G. Murali. Exploring the impact performance of functionally-graded preplaced aggregate concrete incorporating steel and polypropylene fibres. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 35, 2021, id. 102077.10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102077 ↗
83. Das, K. K. and S. S. E. Lam. Effect of coarse aggregate size and grouting process on properties of preplaced aggregate concrete. Proceedings of the 4 World Congr on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE’19), 2019.10.11159/icsect19.121 ↗
84. Chairunnisa, N., H. Ruzhanah, and L. S. Daniel. The properties of preplaced aggregate concrete technology contain the industrial waste-material and the various shapes and sizes of coarse aggregate. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, id. 012036.10.1088/1757-899X/1212/1/012036 ↗
85. Gandomi, A. H. and D. A. Roke. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 88, 2015, pp. 63–72.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007 ↗
86. He, L., B. Chen, Q. Liu, H. Chen, H. Li, W. T. Chow, et al. A quasi-exponential distribution of interfacial voids and its effect on the interlayer strength of 3D printed concrete. Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 89, 2024, id. 104296.10.1016/j.addma.2024.104296 ↗
87. Lu, D., F. Meng, X. Zhou, Y. Zhuo, Z. Gao, and X. Du. A dynamic elastoplastic model of concrete based on a modeling method with environmental factors as constitutive variables. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 149, 2023, id. 04023102.10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-7206 ↗
88. Kumar, A., H. C. Arora, M. A. Mohammed, K. Kumar, and J. Nedoma. An optimized neuro-bee algorithm approach to predict the FRP-concrete bond strength of RC beams. IEEE Access, Vol. 10, 2021, pp. 3790–3806.10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140046 ↗
89. Mousavi, S. M., A. H. Alavi, A. H. Gandomi, M. Arab Esmaeili, and M. Gandomi. A data mining approach to compressive strength of CFRP-confined concrete cylinders. Structural Engineering & Mechanics, Vol. 36, 2010, id. 759.10.12989/sem.2010.36.6.759 ↗
90. Deepa, C., K. SathiyaKumari, and V. P. Sudha. Prediction of the compressive strength of high performance concrete mix using tree based modeling. International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 6, 2010, pp. 18–24.10.5120/1076-1406 ↗
91. Bonifácio, A. L., J. C. Mendes, M. C. R. Farage, F. S. Barbosa, C. B. Barbosa, and A.-L. Beaucour. Application of support vector machine and finite element method to predict the mechanical properties of concrete. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 16, 2019, id. e205.10.1590/1679-78255297 ↗
92. Willmott, C. J. and K. Matsuura. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, Vol. 30, 2005, pp. 79–82.10.3354/cr030079 ↗
93. DeRousseau, M. A., E. Laftchiev, J. R. Kasprzyk, B. Rajagopalan, and W. V. Srubar. A comparison of machine learning methods for predicting the compressive strength of field-placed concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 228, 2019, id. 116661.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.042 ↗
94. Cameron, A. C. and F. A. G. Windmeijer. An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 77, 1997, pp. 329–342.10.1016/S0304-4076(96)01818-0 ↗
95. Sin, G., K. V. Gernaey, and A. E. Lantz. Good modeling practice for PAT applications: propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Biotechnology Progress, Vol. 25, 2009, pp. 1043–1053.10.1002/btpr.166 ↗
96. Asif, U., M. F. Javed, M. Alyami, and A. W. A. Hammad. Performance evaluation of concrete made with plastic waste using multi-expression programming. Materials Today Communications, Vol. 39, 2024, id. 108789.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108789 ↗
97. Yang, K.-H., A.-R. Cho, and J.-K. Song. Effect of water–binder ratio on the mechanical properties of calcium hydroxide-based alkali-activated slag concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 29, 2012, pp. 504–511.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.062 ↗
98. Najjar, M. F. Innovating two-stage concrete with improved rheological, mechanical and durability properties, The University of Western Ontario (Canada), ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016, id. 29244255.
99. Zhao, R., C. Li, and X. Guan. Advances in modeling surface chloride concentrations in concrete serving in the marine environment: A mini review. Buildings, Vol. 14, 2024, id. 1879.10.3390/buildings14061879 ↗
100. Guo, M., H. Huang, W. Zhang, C. Xue, and M. Huang. Assessment of RC frame capacity subjected to a loss of corner column. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 148, 2022, id. 04022122.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003423 ↗