journal article·2020-05-08Open access

Anthraquinone-Mediated Fuel Cell Anode with an Off-Electrode Heterogeneous Catalyst Accessing High Power Density When Paired with a Mediated Cathode

Yuliya Preger, Mathew R. Johnson, Sourav Biswas, Colin W. Anson, Thatcher W. Root, Shannon S. Stahl

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 5· Issue 5

Abstract

The development of processes for electrochemical energy conversion and chemical production could benefit from new strategies to interface chemical redox reactions with electrodes. Here, we employ a diffusible low-potential organic redox mediator, 9,10-anthraquinone-2,7-disulfonic acid (AQDS), to promote efficient electrochemical oxidation of H2 at an off-electrode heterogeneous catalyst. This unique approach to integrate chemical and electrochemical redox processes accesses power densities up to 228 mW/cm2 (528 mW/cm2 with iR-correction). These values are significantly greater than those observed in previous mediated electrochemical H2 oxidation methods, including those using enzymes or inorganic mediators. The approach described herein shows how traditional catalytic chemistry can be coupled to electrochemical devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States

Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States

Funding

Division of Chemistry · Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation · Basic Energy Sciences · National Institutes of Health

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.19860683110.1002/anie.198606831 ↗
2. 10.1070/RC2009v078n02ABEH00388610.1070/RC2009v078n02ABEH003886 ↗
3. 10.1039/c3cs60464k10.1039/c3cs60464k ↗
4. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0286610.1021/acscatal.6b02866 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.01110.1016/j.joule.2018.06.011 ↗
6. 10.1021/cr500720t10.1021/cr500720t ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0071710.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00717 ↗
8. 10.1002/bit.2249610.1002/bit.22496 ↗
9. 10.1002/ese3.9110.1002/ese3.91 ↗
10. 10.1039/C5SC01538C10.1039/C5SC01538C ↗
11. 10.1016/S0022-0728(97)00393-810.1016/S0022-0728(97)00393-8 ↗
12. 10.1039/b009539g10.1039/b009539g ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20161250010.1002/anie.201612500 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0022010.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00220 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.06.02910.1016/j.bios.2015.06.029 ↗
16. 10.1002/cphc.20130004410.1002/cphc.201300044 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.04210.1016/j.rser.2016.09.042 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.03510.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.035 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0065010.1021/acsenergylett.7b00650 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20160492510.1002/anie.201604925 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0133210.1021/acsenergylett.9b01332 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja407189310.1021/ja4071893 ↗
23. 10.1038/ncomms1147410.1038/ncomms11474 ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20160698610.1002/anie.201606986 ↗
25. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0147810.1021/acscatal.6b01478 ↗
26. 10.1149/2.0021601jes10.1149/2.0021601jes ↗
27. 10.1038/nature1290910.1038/nature12909 ↗
28. 10.1149/2.0351704jes10.1149/2.0351704jes ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20160148810.1002/aenm.201601488 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.00510.1016/j.joule.2018.07.005 ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20070060410.1002/anie.200700604 ↗
32. 10.1002/anie.20150501710.1002/anie.201505017 ↗
33. 10.1002/anie.20080219210.1002/anie.200802192 ↗
34. 10.1002/cctc.20130106910.1002/cctc.201301069 ↗
35. 10.1039/C5CY00985E10.1039/C5CY00985E ↗
36. 10.1021/ja01862a02710.1021/ja01862a027 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0084661810.1007/BF00846618 ↗
38. Entwistle I. D. · J. Chem. Research (M) · 1977 · 1382
39. Goor, G.; Glenneberg, J.; Jacobi, S. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Elvers, B., Ed. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2007; pp 443–466.
40. Wendlandt, A. E.; Stahl, S. S. In Liquid Phase Aerobic Oxidation Catalysis Stahl, S. S., Alsters, P., Eds. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2016; pp 219–237.10.1002/9783527690121.ch14 ↗
41. 10.1002/bbpc.1987091010910.1002/bbpc.19870910109 ↗
42. 10.5796/electrochemistry.62.120210.5796/electrochemistry.62.1202 ↗
43. 10.1002/cssc.20150144610.1002/cssc.201501446 ↗
44. 10.1002/er.188910.1002/er.1889 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.01010.1016/j.joule.2018.09.010 ↗
46. 10.1039/C7SC05388F10.1039/C7SC05388F ↗
47. Carson W. N. · Proc. Ann. Power Sources Conf. · 1959 · 13 · 111
48. 10.1007/BF0111206310.1007/BF01112063 ↗
49. 10.1007/BF0105930410.1007/BF01059304 ↗
50. 10.1007/BF0101956410.1007/BF01019564 ↗
51. 10.1038/nchem.202210.1038/nchem.2022 ↗
52. 10.1002/anie.20150277610.1002/anie.201502776 ↗
53. 10.1002/anie.20140822610.1002/anie.201408226 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.07410.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.074 ↗
55. 10.1002/cssc.20160144110.1002/cssc.201601441 ↗
56. 10.1002/er.316310.1002/er.3163 ↗