journal article·2025-08-04Open access

Advanced explainable models for strength evaluation of self-compacting concrete modified with supplementary glass and marble powders

Kaffayatullah Khan, Muhammad Ehsan Ullah Khan, Ahmed A. Alawi Al-Naghi, Muhammad Nasir Amin, Bawar Iftikhar, Muhammad Tahir Qadir

Abstract

Abstract Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is increasingly adopted in modern construction due to its self-flowing nature, which eliminates the need for mechanical vibration and enhances construction quality. The use of industrial waste materials like marble powder (MP) and glass powder (GP) in SCC presents a sustainable alternative to conventional materials, reducing environmental impact. However, predicting the compressive strength (CS) of such mixes through traditional testing methods is time-consuming, costly, and limits rapid mix optimization. This motivates the adoption of machine learning (ML) techniques, which can efficiently analyze complex datasets and identify patterns that influence concrete performance. In this study, three ML models, gradient boosting, bagging regression, and random forest (RF), were used to predict the CS of SCC incorporating MP and GP. Among them, RF achieved the highest accuracy ( R ² = 0.95). Model interpretability was ensured through Shapley Additive exPlanations, partial dependence plots, and individual conditional expectation analyses, which identified curing time as the most influential feature. The Taylor plot and validation metrics confirmed RF’s superior reliability. This research highlights the potential of ML not only as a predictive tool but also as a means of understanding key factors in sustainable mix design, ultimately promoting smarter and greener construction practices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University , Al-Ahsa , 31982 , Saudi Arabia

Department of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad , Abbottabad , 22060 , Pakistan

Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Ha’il , Ha’il , 55476 , Saudi Arabia

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. Haddad, B., F. Alassaad, and N. Sebaibi. Evaluation of early-age compressive strength in winter prefabrication: a comparative study. Applied Sciences, Vol. 14, 2024, id. 3653.10.3390/app14093653 ↗
2. Goodier, C. I. Development of self-compacting concrete. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, Vol. 156, 2003, pp. 405–414.10.1680/stbu.2003.156.4.405 ↗
3. Hendi, A., A. Behravan, D. Mostofinejad, A. Sedaghatdoost, and M. Amini. A step towards green concrete: Effect of waste silica powder usage under HCl attack. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 188, 2018, pp. 278–289.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.288 ↗
4. Alfaiad, M. A., K. Khan, W. Ahmad, M. N. Amin, A. F. Deifalla, and N. A. Ghamry. Evaluating the compressive strength of glass powder-based cement mortar subjected to the acidic environment using testing and modeling approaches. PloS one, Vol. 18, 2023, id. e0284761.10.1371/journal.pone.0284761 ↗
5. Amin, M. N., H. A. Alkadhim, W. Ahmad, K. Khan, H. Alabduljabbar, and A. Mohamed. Experimental and machine learning approaches to investigate the effect of waste glass powder on the flexural strength of cement mortar. PloS one, Vol. 18, 2023, id. e0280761.10.1371/journal.pone.0280761 ↗
6. Petkova, V., V. Stoyanov, K. Mihaylova, and B. Kostova. Impact of pozzolanic and inert powders on the microstructure and thermal chemistry of cement mortars. Ceramics International, Vol. 51, 2025, pp. 5514–5527.10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.06.018 ↗
7. Hamza, F., T. AliBoucetta, M. Behim, S. Bellara, A. Senouci, and W. Maherzi. Sustainable self-compacting concrete with recycled aggregates, ground granulated blast slag, and limestone filler: a technical and environmental assessment. Sustainability, Vol. 17, 2025, id. 3395.10.3390/su17083395 ↗
8. Wei, M., L. Chen, N. Lei, H. Li, and L. Huang. Mechanical properties and microstructures of thermally activated ultrafine recycled fine powder cementitious materials. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 475, 2025, id. 141195.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141195 ↗
9. Inqiad, W. B., M. S. Siddique, S. S. Alarifi, M. J. Butt, T. Najeh, and Y. Gamil. Comparative analysis of various machine learning algorithms to predict 28-day compressive strength of Self-compacting concrete. Heliyon, Vol. 9, 2023, id. e22036.10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22036 ↗
10. Ren, L., N. Wang, W. Pang, Y. Li, and G. Zhang. Modeling and monitoring the material removal rate of abrasive belt grinding based on vision measurement and the gene expression programming (GEP) algorithm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 120, 2022, pp. 385–401.10.1007/s00170-022-08822-z ↗
11. Haque, M. A., B. Chen, A. Kashem, T. Qureshi, and A. A. M. Ahmed. Hybrid intelligence models for compressive strength prediction of MPC composites and parametric analysis with SHAP algorithm. Materials Today Communications, Vol. 35, 2023, id. 105547.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105547 ↗
12. Shi, C., Y. Wu, C. Riefler, and H. Wang. Characteristics and pozzolanic reactivity of glass powders. Cement and Concrete research, Vol. 35, 2005, pp. 987–993.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.015 ↗
13. Jiang, Z., G. He, Y. Jiang, H. Zhao, Y. Duan, G. Yuan, et al. Synergistic preparation and properties of ceramic foams from wolframite tailings and high-borosilicate waste glass. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 457, 2024, id. 139367.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139367 ↗
14. Zrar, Y. J. and K. H. Younis. Mechanical and durability properties of self-compacted concrete incorporating waste crumb rubber as sand replacement: A review. Sustainability, Vol. 14, 2022, id. 11301.10.3390/su141811301 ↗
15. Chen, J., J. Zhuang, S. Shen, and S. Dong. Experimental investigation on the impact resistance of rubber self-compacting concrete. In Proceedings of the Structures, 2022, pp. 691–704.10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.057 ↗
16. Aslani, F., G. Ma, D. L. Y. Wan, and V. X. T. Le. Experimental investigation into rubber granules and their effects on the fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 172, 2018, pp. 1835–1847.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.003 ↗
17. Hasan, R., M. H. R. Sobuz, A. S. M. Akid, M. R. Awall, M. Houda, A. Saha, et al. Eco-friendly self-consolidating concrete production with reinforcing jute fiber. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 63, 2023, id. 105519.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105519 ↗
18. Liu, K., M. S. Alam, J. Zhu, J. Zheng, and L. Chi. Prediction of carbonation depth for recycled aggregate concrete using ANN hybridized with swarm intelligence algorithms. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 301, 2021, id. 124382.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124382 ↗
19. Señas, L., C. Priano, and S. Marfil. Influence of recycled aggregates on properties of self-consolidating concretes. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 113, 2016, pp. 498–505.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.079 ↗
20. Ahmad, W., V. S. S. C. S. Veeraghantla, and A. Byrne. Advancing sustainable concrete using biochar: experimental and modelling study for mechanical strength evaluation. Sustainability, Vol. 17, 2025, id. 2516.10.3390/su17062516 ↗
21. Guo, Z., T. Jiang, J. Zhang, X. Kong, C. Chen, and D. E. Lehman. Mechanical and durability properties of sustainable self-compacting concrete with recycled concrete aggregate and fly ash, slag and silica fume. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 231, 2020, id. 117115.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117115 ↗
22. Tanyildizi, H. and A. Çevik. Modeling mechanical performance of lightweight concrete containing silica fume exposed to high temperature using genetic programming. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 24, 2010, pp. 2612–2618.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.05.001 ↗
23. Ahmed, H. U., R. R. Mostafa, A. Mohammed, P. Sihag, and A. Qadir. Support vector regression (SVR) and grey wolf optimization (GWO) to predict the compressive strength of GGBFS-based geopolymer concrete. Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2022, pp. 2909–2926.10.1007/s00521-022-07724-1 ↗
24. Alsharari, F., B. Iftikhar, M. A. Uddin, and A. F. Deifalla. Data-driven strategy for evaluating the response of eco-friendly concrete at elevated temperatures for fire resistance construction. Results in Engineering, Vol. 20, 2023, id. 101595.10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101595 ↗
25. Li, H., J. Lin, X. Lei, and T. Wei. Compressive strength prediction of basalt fiber reinforced concrete via random forest algorithm. Materials Today Communications, Vol. 30, 2022, id. 103117.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.103117 ↗
26. Dahiya, N., B. Saini, and H. D. Chalak. Gradient boosting-based regression modelling for estimating the time period of the irregular precast concrete structural system with cross bracing. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 2021.10.1016/j.jksues.2021.08.004 ↗
27. Kumar, S., R. Kumar, B. Rai, and P. Samui. Prediction of compressive strength of high-volume fly ash self-compacting concrete with silica fume using machine learning techniques. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 438, 2024, id. 136933.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136933 ↗
28. Gill, A. S. and R. Siddique. Durability properties of self-compacting concrete incorporating metakaolin and rice husk ash. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 176, 2018, pp. 323–332.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.054 ↗
29. Amlashi, A. T., S. M. Abdollahi, S. Goodarzi, and A. R. Ghanizadeh. Soft computing based formulations for slump, compressive strength, and elastic modulus of bentonite plastic concrete. Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 230, 2019, pp. 1197–1216.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.168 ↗
30. El Ouni, M. H., S. H. A. Shah, A. Ali, S. Muhammad, M. S. Mahmood, B. Ali, et al. Mechanical performance, water and chloride permeability of hybrid steel-polypropylene fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 16, 2022, id. e00831.10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00831 ↗
31. Siddique, R. Properties of self-compacting concrete containing class F fly ash. Materials & Design, Vol. 32, 2011, pp. 1501–1507.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.043 ↗
32. Aidjouli, Y., C. Belebchouche, A. Hammoudi, E.-H. Kadri, S. Zaouai, and S. Czarnecki. Modeling the properties of sustainable self-compacting concrete containing marble and glass powder wastes using response surface methodology. Sustainability, Vol. 16, 2024, id. 1972.10.3390/su16051972 ↗
33. Chen, Z. Application of machine learning boosting and bagging methods to predict compressive and flexural strength of marble cement mortar. Materials Today Communications, Vol. 39, 2024, id. 108600.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108600 ↗
34. Liu, H., S. A. Khan, M. N. Amin, F. Althoey, and M. T. Qadir. Evaluating the strength loss and the effectiveness of glass and eggshell powder for cement mortar under acidic conditions. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2024, id. 20240042.10.1515/rams-2024-0042 ↗
35. de-Prado-Gil, J., C. Palencia, P. Jagadesh, and R. Martínez-García. A comparison of machine learning tools that model the splitting tensile strength of self-compacting recycled aggregate concrete. Materials, Vol. 15, 2022, id. 4164.10.3390/ma15124164 ↗
36. Jiang, Y., L. Liu, J. Yan, and Z. Wu. Room-to-low temperature thermo-mechanical behavior and corresponding constitutive model of liquid oxygen compatible epoxy composites. Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 245, 2024, id. 110357.10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110357 ↗
37. Gandomi, A. H. and D. A. Roke. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 88, 2015, pp. 63–72.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007 ↗
38. Frank, I. E. and R. Todeschini. The data analysis handbook, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994.
39. Gandomi, A. H., A. H. Alavi, M. Mousavi, and S. M. Tabatabaei. A hybrid computational approach to derive new ground-motion prediction equations. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 24, 2011, pp. 717–732.10.1016/j.engappai.2011.01.005 ↗
40. Sarikaya, A. and M. Gleicher. Scatterplots: Tasks, data, and designs. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 24, 2017, pp. 402–412.10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744184 ↗
41. Cui, Q., M. O. Ward, and E. A. Rundensteiner. Enhancing scatterplot matrices for data with ordering or spatial attributes. In Proceedings of the Visualization and Data Analysis, Vol. 2006, 2006, pp. 248–258.10.1117/12.650409 ↗
42. Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2001, pp. 1189–1232.10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
43. Maclin, R. Boosting classifiers regionally. In Proceedings of the AAAI/IAAI, 1998, pp. 700–705.
44. Wang, H., Y. Jiang, and H. Wang. Stock return prediction based on Bagging-decision tree. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS 2009), 2009, pp. 1575–1580.10.1109/GSIS.2009.5408165 ↗
45. Liaw, A. and M. Wiener. Classification and regression by randomForest. R news, Vol. 2, 2002, pp. 18–22.
46. Hastie, T. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, Springer, New York, Vol. 2, 2009, pp. 1–758.
47. Krause, J., A. Perer, and K. Ng. Interacting with predictions: Visual inspection of black-box machine learning models. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2016, pp. 5686–5697.10.1145/2858036.2858529 ↗
48. Ribeiro, M. T.; Singh, S.; Guestrin, C. Model-agnostic interpretability of machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05386, 2016.
49. Goldstein, A., A. Kapelner, J. Bleich, and E. Pitkin. Peeking inside the black box: Visualizing statistical learning with plots of individual conditional expectation. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 24, 2015, pp. 44–65.10.1080/10618600.2014.907095 ↗
50. Lundberg, S. M.; Erion, G. G.; Lee, S.-I. Consistent individualized feature attribution for tree ensembles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03888, 2018.
51. Sin, G., K. V. Gernaey, and A. E. Lantz. Good modeling practice for PAT applications: Propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Biotechnology progress, Vol. 25, 2009, pp. 1043–1053.10.1002/btpr.166 ↗
52. Abuhussain, M. A., A. Ahmad, M. N. Amin, F. Althoey, Y. Gamil, and T. Najeh. Data-driven approaches for strength prediction of alkali-activated composites. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 20, 2024, id. e02920.10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02920 ↗
53. Lundberg, S. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874, 2017.
54. Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and M. Wainwright. Statistical learning with sparsity. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, Vol. 143, 2015, id. 8.
55. Babanajad, S. K., A. H. Gandomi, and A. H. Alavi. New prediction models for concrete ultimate strength under true-triaxial stress states: An evolutionary approach. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 110, 2017, pp. 55–68.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.03.011 ↗
56. Althoey, F., M. N. Amin, K. Khan, M. M. Usman, M. A. Khan, M. F. Javed, et al. Machine learning based computational approach for crack width detection of self-healing concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 17, 2022, id. e01610.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01610 ↗
57. Shah, S., M. Houda, S. Khan, F. Althoey, M. Abuhussain, M. A. Abuhussain, et al. Mechanical behaviour of E-waste aggregate concrete using a novel machine learning algorithm: Multi expression programming (MEP). Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 25, 2023, pp. 5720–5740.10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.041 ↗
58. Hodson, T. O. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): When to use them or not. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 2022, 2022, pp. 1–10.10.5194/gmd-2022-64 ↗
59. Chicco, D., M. J. Warrens, and G. Jurman. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. Peerj Computer Science, Vol. 7, 2021, id. e623.10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
60. Lee, S.-B., T. G. Habetler, R. G. Harley, and D. J. Gritter. An evaluation of model-based stator resistance estimation for induction motor stator winding temperature monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 17, 2002, pp. 7–15.10.1109/60.986431 ↗
61. Brown, S., K. Lo, and T. Lys. Use of R2 in accounting research: measuring changes in value relevance over the last four decades. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 28, 1999, pp. 83–115.10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00023-3 ↗
62. Farooq, F., W. Ahmed, A. Akbar, F. Aslam, and R. Alyousef. Predictive modeling for sustainable high-performance concrete from industrial wastes: A comparison and optimization of models using ensemble learners. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 292, 2021, id. 126032.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126032 ↗
63. Natekin, A. and A. Knoll. Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial. Frontiers in neurorobotics, Vol. 7, 2013, id. 21.10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021 ↗
64. Prokhorenkova, L., G. Gusev, A. Vorobev, A. V. Dorogush, and A. Gulin. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018, id. 31.
65. Jabbar, H. and R. Z. Khan. Methods to avoid over-fitting and under-fitting in supervised machine learning (comparative study). Computer Science. Communication and Instrumentation Devices, Vol. 70, 2015, pp. 978–981.10.3850/978-981-09-5247-1_017 ↗
66. Van der Aalst, W. M., V. Rubin, H. Verbeek, B. F. van Dongen, E. Kindler, and C. W. Günther. Process mining: a two-step approach to balance between underfitting and overfitting. Software & Systems Modeling, Vol. 9, 2010, pp. 87–111.10.1007/s10270-008-0106-z ↗
67. Taylor, K. E. Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 106, 2001, pp. 7183–7192.10.1029/2000JD900719 ↗
68. Wang, L., R. Zhang, G. Wang, J. Zhao, D. Yang, Z. Kang, et al. Effect of long reaction distance on gas composition from organic-rich shale pyrolysis under high-temperature steam environment. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, Vol. 11, 2024, id. 34.10.1007/s40789-024-00689-7 ↗
69. Cui, L., P. Chen, L. Wang, J. Li, and H. Ling. Application of extreme gradient boosting based on grey relationa analysis for prediction of compressive strength of concrete. Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2021, 2021, id. 8878396.10.1155/2021/8878396 ↗
70. Honegger, M. Shedding light on black box machine learning algorithms: Development of an axiomatic framework to assess the quality of methods that explain individual predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.05054 2018.
71. Inqiad, W. B., E. V. Dumitrascu, R. A. Dobre, N. M. Khan, A. H. Hammood, S. N. Henedy, et al. Predicting compressive strength of hollow concrete prisms using machine learning techniques and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Heliyon, Vol. 10, 2024, id. e36841.10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36841 ↗
72. Lundberg, S. M., G. Erion, H. Chen, A. DeGrave, J. M. Prutkin, B. Nair, et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, Vol. 2, 2020, pp. 56–67.10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
73. Iqbal, M. F., M. F. Javed, M. Rauf, I. Azim, M. Ashraf, J. Yang, et al. Sustainable utilization of foundry waste: Forecasting mechanical properties of foundry sand based concrete using multi-expression programming. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 780, 2021, id. 146524.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146524 ↗
74. Chen, L., Z. Wang, A. A. Khan, M. Khan, M. F. Javed, A. Alaskar, et al. Development of predictive models for sustainable concrete via genetic programming-based algorithms. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 24, 2023, pp. 6391–6410.10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.180 ↗