journal article·2024-12-31Open access

Exploring the impact of seashell powder and nano-silica on ultra-high-performance self-curing concrete: Insights into mechanical strength, durability, and high-temperature resilience

Yitong Sun, Muwaffaq Alqurashi, Sahar A. Mostafa

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the impact of using seashell powder, shells mixed with nano-silica, and basic oxygen furnace slag as sand substitutes in addition to the internal curing regime. This study focuses on important factors related to material sustainability and the efficient use of resources. The comprehensive evaluation of mechanical properties, including compressive and tensile strength at different stages, provides a significant understanding of the performance improvements achieved with these innovative additives. Durability tests, which evaluate the absorption, water permeability, salt penetration, and sulfate resistance, advance our understanding of how these materials enhance the long-term durability of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) under extreme environmental conditions. In addition, examining UHPC samples at high temperatures (350 and 700°C) and applying scanning electron microscopy. The improved mechanical strength and toughness achieved using seashells and nano-silica demonstrated the potential of these additives to create UHPC that is more sustainable and environmentally friendly. The results indicate that the addition of seashell powder slightly reduced the compressive strength. However, replacing cement with a blend of seashells and nano-silica led to an improvement ranging from 5 to 6% in compressive strength across various replacement ratios at 7, 28, and 90 days. The optimum strength is obtained at a 5% replacement ratio. Tensile strength also increased from 1.6 to 1.8 MPa when seashells were pre-mixed with nano-silica. The incorporation of nano-silica significantly enhanced the thermal stability of the seashells, resulting in a better residual strength of 84–93% at 350°C and ranged from 68 to 82% at 700°C. Furthermore, the combination of seashells and seashell powder with nano-silica notably improved durability by reducing the water permeability, sorptivity, and chloride penetration depth. The residual strength of UHPC showed greater improvement after exposure to a sulfate environment when the seashells were combined with nano-silica than when seashells alone were used and achieved 81 MPa compared to 69.1 MPa for the control mix and 74 MPa for seashells only. Overall, the inclusion of seashells pre-mixed with nano-silica in UHPC enhanced the microstructure at both normal and elevated temperatures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Materials Engineering and Processing · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Northwest A&F University , Yangling 712100 , China

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University , P.O. Box 11099 , Taif 21944 , Saudi Arabia

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Beni-Suef University , Beni-Suef , Egypt

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. Bahmani, H. and D. Mostofinejad. Microstructure of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) – A review study. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 50, 2022, id. 104118.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104118 ↗
2. Huang, B. T., J. X. Zhu, K. F. Weng, J. Q. Huang, and J. G. Dai. Prefabricated UHPC-concrete-ECC underground utility tunnel reinforced by perforated steel plate: Experimental and numerical investigations. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 16, 2022, id. e00856.10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00856 ↗
3. Khan, M., J. Lao, and J. G. Dai. Comparative study of advanced computational techniques for estimating the compressive strength of UHPC. Journal of Asian Concrete Federation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2022, pp. 51–68.10.18702/acf.2022.6.8.1.51 ↗
4. Ozawa, M., S. Subedi Parajuli, Y. Uchida, and B. Zhou. Preventive effects of polypropylene and jute fibers on spalling of UHPC at high temperatures in combination with waste porous ceramic fine aggregate as an internal curing material. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 206, 2019, pp. 219–225.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.056 ↗
5. Peng, G.-F., X. J. Niu, Y. J. Shang, D. P. Zhang, X. W. Chen, and H. Ding. Combined curing as a novel approach to improve resistance of ultra-high performance concrete to explosive spalling under high temperature and its mechanical properties. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 109, 2018, pp. 147–158.10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.011 ↗
6. Shen, P., L. Lu, Y. He, F. Wang, and S. Hu. The effect of curing regimes on the mechanical properties, nano-mechanical properties and microstructure of ultra-high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 118, 2019, pp. 1–13.10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.01.004 ↗
7. Tayeh, B. A., A. S. Aadi, N. N. Hilal, B. H. Bakar, M. M. Al-Tayeb, and W. N. Mansour. Properties of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) – a review paper. In AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC, 2019.10.1063/1.5126575 ↗
8. Schröfl, C., M. Gruber, and J. Plank. Preferential adsorption of polycarboxylate superplasticizers on cement and silica fume in ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC). Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 42, No. 11, 2012, pp. 1401–1408.10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.08.013 ↗
9. Courtial, M., M. N. de Noirfontaine, F. Dunstetter, M. Signes-Frehel, P. Mounanga, K. Cherkaoui, et al. Effect of polycarboxylate and crushed quartz in UHPC: Microstructural investigation. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 44, 2013, pp. 699–705.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.077 ↗
10. Su, Y., J. Li, C. Wu, P. Wu, and Z. X. Li. Influences of nano-particles on dynamic strength of ultra-high performance concrete. Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 91, 2016, pp. 595–609.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.044 ↗
11. Wu, Z., C. Shi, K. H. Khayat, and L. Xie. Effect of SCM and nano-particles on static and dynamic mechanical properties of UHPC. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 182, 2018, pp. 118–125.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.126 ↗
12. Tayeh, B. A., B. H. A. Bakar, M. A. M. Johari, and Y. L. Voo. Utilization of ultra-high performance fibre concrete (UHPFC) for rehabilitation–a review. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 54, 2013, pp. 525–538.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.048 ↗
13. Baharuddin, N. K., F. Mohamed Nazri, B. H. Abu Bakar, S. Beddu, and B. A. Tayeh. Potential use of ultra high-performance fibre-reinforced concrete as a repair material for fire-damaged concrete in terms of bond strength. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 9, 2020, pp. 87–95.
14. Yu, R., P. H. Spiesz, and H. J. Brouwers. Development of an eco-friendly Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) with efficient cement and mineral admixtures uses. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 55, 2015, pp. 383–394.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.024 ↗
15. Muhd Norhasri, M. S., M. S. Hamidah, A. Mohd Fadzil, and O. Megawati. Inclusion of nano metakaolin as additive in ultra high performance concrete (UHPC). Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 127, 2016, pp. 167–175.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.127 ↗
16. Ghafari, E., M. Arezoumandi, H. Costa, and E. Júlio. Influence of nano-silica addition on durability of UHPC. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 94, 2015, pp. 181–188.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.009 ↗
17. Abdulkareem, O. M., A. Ben Fraj, M. Bouasker, and A. Khelidj. Mixture design and early age investigations of more sustainable UHPC. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 163, 2018, pp. 235–246.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.107 ↗
18. Alsalman, A., C. N. Dang, J. R. Martí-Vargas, and W. Micah Hale. Mixture-proportioning of economical UHPC mixtures. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 27, 2020, id. 100970.10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100970 ↗
19. Chen, Y., R. Yu, X. Wang, J. Chen, and Z. Shui. Evaluation and optimization of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) subjected to harsh ocean environment: Towards an application of Layered Double Hydroxides (LDHs). Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 177, 2018, pp. 51–62.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.210 ↗
20. Zhou, M., W. Lu, J. Song, and G. C. Lee. Application of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in bridge engineering. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 186, 2018, pp. 1256–1267.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.036 ↗
21. Liu, K., R. Yu, Z. Shui, X. Li, C. Guo, B. Yu, et al. Optimization of autogenous shrinkage and microstructure for Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) based on appropriate application of porous pumice. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 214, 2019, pp. 369–381.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.089 ↗
22. Yu, Z., L. Wu, Z. Yuan, C. Zhang, and T. Bangi. Mechanical properties, durability and application of ultra-high-performance concrete containing coarse aggregate (UHPC-CA): A review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 334, 2022, id. 127360.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127360 ↗
23. Azmee, N. M. and N. Shafiq. Ultra-high performance concrete: From fundamental to applications. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 9, 2018, id. e00197.10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00197 ↗
24. Wu, D., X. Li, X. Guo, J. Qin, and S. Li. Early-age shrinkage development of ultra-high-performance concrete under heat curing treatment. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 131, 2017, pp. 767–774.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.024 ↗
25. Demiss, B. A., W. O. Oyawa, and S. M. Shitote. Mechanical and microstructural properties of recycled reactive powder concrete containing waste glass powder and fly ash at standard curing. Cogent Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2018, id. 1464877.10.1080/23311916.2018.1464877 ↗
26. Zhang, H., T. Ji, B. He, and L. He. Performance of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) with cement partially replaced by ground granite powder (GGP) under different curing conditions. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 213, 2019, pp. 469–482.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.058 ↗
27. Zhang, H., T. Ji, and X. Lin. Pullout behavior of steel fibers with different shapes from ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) prepared with granite powder under different curing conditions. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 211, 2019, pp. 688–702.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.274 ↗
28. Tayeh, B. A., B. H. A. Bakar, M. A. M. Johari, and M. M. Ratnam. The relationship between substrate roughness parameters and bond strength of ultra high-performance fiber concrete. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Vol. 27, No. 16, 2013, pp. 1790–1810.10.1080/01694243.2012.761543 ↗
29. Tayeh, B. A., B. H. Abu Bakar, M. A. Megat Johari, and A. M. Zeyad. Microstructural analysis of the adhesion mechanism between old concrete substrate and UHPFC. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 18, 2014, pp. 1846–1864.10.1080/01694243.2014.925386 ↗
30. Tayeh, B. A., B. A. Bakar, and M. M. Johari. Mechanical properties of old concrete – UHPFC interface. In Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting III: 3rd International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting, ICCRRR-3, CRC Press, Cape Town, South Africa, September 2012.
31. Askar, L. K., B. A. Tayeh, and B. Abu Bakar. Effect of different curing conditions on the mechanical properties of UHPFC. Iranian (Iranica) Journal of Energy & Environment, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2013, pp. 299–303.10.5829/idosi.ijee.2013.04.03.18 ↗
32. ACI H. “308R-Guide to Curing Concrete.” American Concrete Institute International, 2001.
33. Vijayan, D. S., S. Arvindan, D. Parthiban, R. S. Kumar, B. Saravanan, and Y. Robert. An experimental study on mechanical and durable properties of self-curing concrete by adding admixture. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 33, 2020, pp. 496–501.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.071 ↗
34. Kamal, M. M., M. A. Safan, A. A. Bashandy, and A. M. Khalil. Experimental investigation on the behavior of normal strength and high strength self-curing self-compacting concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 16, 2018, pp. 79–93.10.1016/j.jobe.2017.12.012 ↗
35. Van, V.-T.-A., C. Rößler, D. D. Bui, and H. M. Ludwig. Rice husk ash as both pozzolanic admixture and internal curing agent in ultra-high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 53, 2014, pp. 270–278.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.015 ↗
36. Singh, K. Mechanical properties of self curing concrete studied using polyethylene glycol-400: A-review. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 37, 2020, pp. 2318–2320.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.662 ↗
37. Md Jaafar, M. F., H. Mohd Saman, N. F. Ariffin, K. Muthusamy, S. Wan Ahmad, and N. Ismail. Corrosion monitoring on steel reinforced nano metaclayed-UHPC towards strain modulation using fiber Bragg grating sensor. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 431, 2018, id. 122006.10.1088/1757-899X/431/12/122006 ↗
38. Xiaoyu, G., F. Yingfang, and L. Haiyang. The compressive behavior of cement mortar with the addition of nano metakaolin. Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, Vol. 8, 2018, id. 184798041875559.10.1177/1847980418755599 ↗
39. Abo-El-Enein, S. A., M. S. Amin, F. I. El-Hosiny, S. Hanafi, T. M. ElSokkary, and M. M. Hazem. Pozzolanic and hydraulic activity of nano-metakaolin. HBRC Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2019, pp. 64–72.10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.09.006 ↗
40. Guo, J., Y. Bao, and M. Wang. Steel slag in China: Treatment, recycling, and management. Waste Management, Vol. 78, 2018, pp. 318–330.10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.045 ↗
41. Horii, K., N. Tsutsumi, Y. Kitano, and T. Kato. Processing and reusing technologies for steelmaking slag. Nippon Steel Technical Report, Vol. 104, 2013, pp. 123–129.
42. Ahmed, M. J., S. Durand, M. Antoun, F. Gauvin, S. Amziane, and H. J. H. Brouwers. Utilization of air granulated basic oxygen furnace slag as a binder in belite calcium sulfoaluminate cement: A sustainable alternative. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 436, 2024, id. 140539.10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140539 ↗
43. Humbert, P. S. and J. Castro-Gomes. CO2 activated steel slag-based materials: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 208, 2019, pp. 448–457.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.058 ↗
44. Song, Q., M. Z. Guo, L. Wang, and T. C. Ling. Use of steel slag as sustainable construction materials: A review of accelerated carbonation treatment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 173, 2021, id. 105740.10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105740 ↗
45. Jiang, Y.-Q., Y. C. Lin, X. Y. Zhang, C. Chen, Q. W. Wang, and G. D. Pang. Isothermal tensile deformation behaviors and fracture mechanism of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe alloy in β phase field. Vacuum, Vol. 156, 2018, pp. 187–197.10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.07.034 ↗
46. Zago, S. C., F. Vernilli, and O. Cascudo. The reuse of basic oxygen furnace slag as concrete aggregate to achieve sustainable development: Characteristics and limitations. Buildings, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2023, id. 1193.10.3390/buildings13051193 ↗
47. Zhou, X., Q. Yuan, L. Chen, K. Zheng, S. Wei, and Y. Iftikhar. Sulfate resistance of carbonated basic oxygen furnace slag-metakaolin-Portland cement blends. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 87, 2024, id. 109098.10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109098 ↗
48. A. ASTM, C150/C150M-17. Standard Specifcation for Portland Cement, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
49. Meng, W. and K. H. Khayat. Effect of graphite nanoplatelets and carbon nanofibers on rheology, hydration, shrinkage, mechanical properties, and microstructure of UHPC. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 105, 2018, pp. 64–71.10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.001 ↗
50. Concrete, A.I.C.C.o. and C. Aggregates. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens, ASTM international, 2014.
51. Concrete, A.I.C.C.o. and C. Aggregates. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens1, ASTM international, 2017.
52. Ali, N., O. Canpolat, Y. Aygörmez, and M. M. Al-Mashhadani. Evaluation of the 12–24 mm basalt fibers and boron waste on reinforced metakaolin-based geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 251, 2020, id. 118976.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118976 ↗
53. Wu, Y., J. Lu, Y. Nie, and W. He. Effect of seashell powder as binder material on the performance and microstructure of low-carbon sustainable alkali-activated concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 90, 2024, id. 109442.10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109442 ↗
54. Olivia, M., A. A. Mifshella, and L. Darmayanti. Mechanical properties of seashell concrete. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 125, 2015, pp. 760–764.10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.127 ↗
55. Bamigboye, G. O., A. T. Nworgu, A. O. Odetoyan, M. Kareem, D. O. Enabulele, and D. E. Bassey. Sustainable use of seashells as binder in concrete production: Prospect and challenges. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 34, 2021, id. 101864.10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101864 ↗
56. Ma, B., J. Wang, H. Tan, X. Li, L. Cai, Y. Zhou, et al. Utilization of waste marble powder in cement-based materials by incorporating nano silica. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 211, 2019, pp. 139–149.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.248 ↗
57. Yu, R., P. Spiesz, and H. J. H. Brouwers. Effect of nano-silica on the hydration and microstructure development of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) with a low binder amount. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 65, 2014, pp. 140–150.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.063 ↗
58. Xu, W., T. Y. Lo, W. Wang, D. Ouyang, P. Wang, and F. Xing. Pozzolanic reactivity of silica fume and ground rice husk ash as reactive silica in a cementitious system: a comparative study. Materials (Basel), Vol. 9, No. 3, 2016, id. 146.10.3390/ma9030146 ↗
59. Alvee, A. R., R. Malinda, A. M. Akbar, R. D. Ashar, C. Rahmawati, T. Alomayri, et al. Experimental study of the mechanical properties and microstructure of geopolymer paste containing nano-silica from agricultural waste and crystalline admixtures. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 16, 2022, id. e00792.10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00792 ↗
60. Hakeem, I. Y., M. Amin, B. A. Abdelsalam, B. A. Tayeh, F. Althoey, and I. S. Agwa. Effects of nano-silica and micro-steel fiber on the engineering properties of ultra-high performance concrete. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 82, No. 3, 2022, pp. 295–312.
61. Ashrafian, A., M. J. Taheri Amiri, M. Rezaie-Balf, T. Ozbakkaloglu, and O. Lotfi-Omran. Prediction of compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity of fiber reinforced concrete incorporating nano silica using heuristic regression methods. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 190, 2018, pp. 479–494.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.047 ↗
62. Hamada, H. M., F. Abed, B. Tayeh, M. S. Al Jawahery, A. Majdi, and S. T. Yousif. Effect of recycled seashells on concrete properties: A comprehensive review of the recent studies. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 376, 2023, id. 376.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131036 ↗
63. Tchakouté, H. K., D. E. Tchinda Mabah, C. Henning Rüscher, E. Kamseu, F. Andreola, M. C. Bignozzi, et al. Preparation of low-cost nano and microcomposites from chicken eggshell, nano-silica and rice husk ash and their utilisations as additives for producing geopolymer cements. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2020, pp. 149–161.10.1080/21870764.2020.1718860 ↗
64. Mostafa, S. A., M. M. El-Deeb, A. A. Farghali, and A. S. Faried. Evaluation of the nano silica and nano waste materials on the corrosion protection of high strength steel embedded in ultra-high performance concrete. Scientific Reports, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2021, id. 2617.10.1038/s41598-021-82322-0 ↗
65. Ahsan, M. H., M. S. Siddique, S. H. Farooq, M. Usman, M. A. Ul Aleem, M. Hussain, et al. Mechanical behavior of high-strength concrete incorporating seashell powder at elevated temperatures. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 50, 2022, id. 104226.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104226 ↗
66. Zhang, Y., D. Chen, Y. Liang, K. Qu, K. Lu, S. Chen, et al. Study on engineering properties of foam concrete containing waste seashell. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 260, 2020, id. 119896.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119896 ↗
67. Sangeetha, P., V. E. Annamalai, and P. Kaythry. Durability studies on concrete with partial replacement of cement and coarse aggregate by seashell waste. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023.10.1016/j.matpr.2023.12.009 ↗
68. Abhilash, P. P., D. K. Nayak, B. Sangoju, R. Kumar, and V. Kumar. Effect of nano-silica in concrete; a review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 278, 2021, id. 122347.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122347 ↗
69. Heikal, M., H. A. Abdel-Gawwad, and F. A. Ababneh. Positive impact performance of hybrid effect of nano-clay and silica nano-particles on composite cements. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 190, 2018, pp. 508–516.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.163 ↗
70. Harilal, M., V. R. Rathish, B. Anandkumar, R. P. George, M. S. H. S. Mohammed, J. Philip, et al. High performance green concrete (HPGC) with improved strength and chloride ion penetration resistance by synergistic action of fly ash, nanoparticles and corrosion inhibitor. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 198, 2019, pp. 299–312.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.266 ↗
71. Amorim Júnior, N. S., J. S. Andrade Neto, H. A. Santana, M. S. Cilla, and D. V. Ribeiro. Durability and service life analysis of metakaolin-based geopolymer concretes with respect to chloride penetration using chloride migration test and corrosion potential. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 287, 2021, id. 122970.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122970 ↗
72. Das, J. K. and B. Pradhan. Long term effect of corrosion inhibitor and associated cation type of chloride ions on chloride profile of concrete exposed to composite chloride-sulfate environment. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 32, 2020, pp. 803–809.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.014 ↗
73. Diab, A. M., H. E. Elyamany, A. E. M. Abd Elmoaty, and M. M. Sreh. Effect of nanomaterials additives on performance of concrete resistance against magnesium sulfate and acids. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 210, 2019, pp. 210–231.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.099 ↗
74. He, Z. H., S. G. Du, and D. Chen. Microstructure of ultra high performance concrete containing lithium slag. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 353, 2018, pp. 35–43.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.03.063 ↗
75. Yonggui, W., L. Shuaipeng, P. Hughes, and F. Yuhui. Mechanical properties and microstructure of basalt fibre and nano-silica reinforced recycled concrete after exposure to elevated temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 247, 2020, id. 118561.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118561 ↗
76. Mostafa, S. A., A. S. Faried, A. A. Farghali, M. M. El-Deeb, T. A. Tawfik, S. Majer, et al. Influence of nanoparticles from waste materials on mechanical properties, durability and microstructure of UHPC. Materials (Basel), Vol. 13, No. 20, 2020, id. 4530.10.3390/ma13204530 ↗
77. Li, Y., H. Mehdizadeh, K. H. Mo, and T. C. Ling. Co-utilization of aqueous carbonated basic oxygen furnace slag (BOFS) and carbonated filtrate in cement pastes considering reaction duration effect. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 138, 2023, id. 104988.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.104988 ↗
78. Mo, K. H., U. J. Alengaram, M. Z. Jumaat, S. C. Lee, W. I. Goh, and C. W. Yuen. Recycling of seashell waste in concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 162, 2018, pp. 751–764.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.009 ↗
79. Tayeh, B. A., M. W. Hasaniyah, A. M. Zeyad, and M. O. Yusuf. Properties of concrete containing recycled seashells as cement partial replacement: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 237, 2019, id. 117723.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117723 ↗
80. Abdel-Gawwad, H. A., M. Heikal, M. S. Mohammed, S. A. El-Aleem, H. S. Hassan, S. R. V. García, et al. Evaluating the impact of nano-magnesium calcite waste on the performance of cement mortar in normal and sulfate-rich media. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 203, 2019, pp. 392–400.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.108 ↗
81. Pourchet, S., S. Liautaud, D. Rinaldi, and I. Pochard. Effect of the repartition of the PEG side chains on the adsorption and dispersion behaviors of PCP in presence of sulfate. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2012, pp. 431–439.10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.11.011 ↗