Effect of Fatigue Precracking on Crack Engagement during Sonic IR Testing
Source abstract
Abstract
A series of sonic IR tests were performed on modified eccentrically-loaded single edge tension [ESE(T)] specimens in which crack lengths were nominally identical, but the precracking load history used to develop the sharp cracks used in the tests was varied from specimen to specimen. A measure for crack engagement length, defined as the length of crack that develops heat during sonic IR inspection was established for these tests. The result suggest that, in a certain regime, crack engagement length correlates with fatigue opening load, which is the stress intensity factor at which the crack front is fully open during the fatigue precracking. The implication of this is that laboratory test results for sonic IR should be performed with test specimens that have undergone careful precracking procedures, and that these procedures should be reported with test results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.115063010.1063/1.1150630 ↗
2. D. L. Favro , X. Han , Z. Ouyang , H. Sui , G. Sun , L. R. Thomas . Infrared Imaging of Ultrasonicaly Excited Subsurface Defects in Materials. U.S. Patent 6,236,049. May, 2001 .
3. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00151-710.1016/S0142-1123(01)00151-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/0041-624X(81)90095-010.1016/0041-624X(81)90095-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.07.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2003.07.005 ↗
6. C.H. Wong , J. C. Chen , and W. T. Riddell .Proceedings of the 35th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, AIP Conference Proceedings1096:481–488 (2008) .
7. 10.1080/1058975070144767210.1080/10589750701447672 ↗
8. 10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-710.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0041-624X(97)00041-310.1016/S0041-624X(97)00041-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/0020-7225(79)90008-910.1016/0020-7225(79)90008-9 ↗
11. Rudenko O. · Acoust. Phys. · 1994 · 40 · 593
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.08.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2003.08.009 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00119-310.1016/S0022-5096(01)00119-3 ↗
14. D. Hull .Fractography: Observing, Measuring, and Interpreting Fracture Surface Topography, pp. 283 – 285 . Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , UK , ( 1999 ).
15. 10.1080/1058975070144817510.1080/10589750701448175 ↗
16. 10.1016/0013-7944(72)90065-310.1016/0013-7944(72)90065-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/0036-9748(75)90545-110.1016/0036-9748(75)90545-1 ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb00372.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb00372.x ↗
19. 10.1299/jsme1958.24.131910.1299/jsme1958.24.1319 ↗
20. Suresh S. · Metall. Trans. · 1981 · 12 · 143510.1007/BF02643688 ↗
21. J. C. Newman Jr.ASTM STP 1372, ASTM , West Conshohocken , PA . pp. 227 – 251 ( 2000 ).
22. Newman J. C. · 1981
23. ASTM Standard E647–08. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. ASTM International (2010) .
24. ASTM Standard E399–09. Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane Strain Fracture Toughness, KICof Metallic Materials. ASTM International (2010) .
25. Zuidema J. · 1995
26. 10.1063/1.165224310.1063/1.1652243 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0003268610.1007/BF00032686 ↗
28. 10.1115/1.342427510.1115/1.3424275 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00674.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00674.x ↗
30. W. T. Riddell , R. S. Piascik , M. A. Sutton , W. Zhao , S. R. McNeill , and J. D. Helm .ASTM STP 1343, pp. 157 – 174 . West Conshohocken , PA ( 1999 ).10.1520/STP15756S ↗
31. Anderson T. L. · 1991
32. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00660.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00660.x ↗
33. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00635.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00635.x ↗