journal article·1990-06

Ultrasonic characterization of microstructure in powder metal alloy

B. R. Tittmann, M. Abdel-Gawad, K. Fertig

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The ultrasonic wave propagation characteristics were measured for IN-100, a powder metallurgy alloy used for aircraft engine components. This material was selected as a model system for testing the feasibility of characterizing the microstructure of a variety of inhomogeneous media including powder metals, ceramics, castings, and composites. The data were obtained for a frequency range from about 2–20 MHz and were statistically averaged over numerous volume elements of the samples. Micrographical examination provided size and number distributions for grain and pore structure. The results showed that the predominant source for the ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter was a dense (∼100/mm3) distribution of small micropores (∼10 μm radius). Two samples with different micropore densities were studied in detail to test the feasibility of calculating from observed microstructural parameters the frequency dependence of the microstructural backscatter in the regime for which the wavelength is much larger than the size of the individual scattering centers. Excellent agreement was found between predicted and observed values so as to demonstrate the feasibility of solving the forward problem. The results suggest a way towards the nondestructive detection and characterization of anomalous distributions of micropores when conventional ultrasonics imaging is difficult. The findings are potentially significant toward the application of the early detection of porosity during the materials fabrication process and after manufacturing of potential sites for stress-induced void coalescence leading to crack initiation and subsequent failure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. M. O'Donnell and J.G. Miller.J. Appl. Phys. 52 1056 (1981)10.1063/1.328803 ↗
2. K. Goebbels. “Method of Quantitatively Determining the Grain Size of Substances,” United States Patent No. 4026, 157, May 31, 1977
3. E.M. Papadakis.J. Acoust. Soc. A 37 711 (1965)10.1121/1.1909401 ↗
4. W.P. Mason and H.J. McSkimin.J. Appl. Phys. 19 940 (1948)10.1063/1.1697900 ↗
5. I.M. Lifshitz and G.D. Parkhomovskii.J. Expt. Theoret. Phys. (USSR)20 175 (1950)
6. A.G. Evans, B.R. Tittmann, L. Ahlberg, B.T. Khun-Yakub, and G.S. Kino.J. Appl. Phys. 49 1669 (1978)
7. K. Lewis, S.W. Wang, and L. Adler. In:Reviews of Progress in Quantitative NDE 3B edited by D.O. Thompson and D. Chimenti, pp. 1203–1210. Plenum, New York (1984)
8. B.R. Tittmann, L.A. Ahlberg and K. Fertig. In:Reviews of Progress in Quantitative NDE, 2A and3A, edited by D.O. Thompson and D. Chimenti, pp. 129–145 and pp. 57–64. Plenum, New York (1983, 1984)
9. K.W. Fertig and J.M. Richardson. In:Reviews of Progress in Quantitative NDE 2A edited by D.O. Thompson and D. Chimenti, pp. 147–169. Plenum, New York (1983)
10. R.B. Thompson. “Diffraction Corrections for Scattering Measurement,” Internal Report, Center of Advanced Nondestructive Evaluation, Ames Laboratory, Iowa State University (1982)
11. R.B. Thompson and T.A. Gray. In:Reviews of Progress in Quantitative NDE 2A edited by D.O. Thompson and D. Chimenti, pp. 567–586. Plenum, New York (1983)
12. C.F. Ying and R. Truell.J. Appl. Phys. 27 1086–1097 (1956)10.1063/1.1722545 ↗
13. P.M. Morse and H. Feshbach.Methods of Theoretical Physics, Part II, Chapters 9–13. McGraw Hill, New York (1953)