journal article·2019-05-04

A computational investigation and smooth-shaped defect synthesis for eddy current testing problems using the subregion finite element method

Mohammad R. Rawashdeh, Anders Rosell, Lalita Udpa, S. Ratnajeevan H. Hoole, Yiming Deng

Publisher page

Abstract

Eddy Current Testing (ECT) plays a key role in detecting cracks and defects in conductors. The present study examines for the first time how the subregion method as an effective mathematical and computational technique can be admixed with Finite Element Method (FEM) to study multiple defects parameters for ECT issues. Separating a defect region from the entire domain in any computational technique will save both time and storage space. Examples of different types of defects are presented in this article . A tangible result of processing time reduction by 90% has been achieved which has led us to consider the subregion FEM method as an effective method in solving different Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) problems. An agreement between our results and others using classical FEM has been achieved which could lead to using this technique in online and field testing problems. The presented subregion FEM algorithm was verified experimentally with good agreement by testing Aluminum (T6061-T6) samples with defects. A Tunneling Magnetoresistive (TMR) sensor was used to measure the component of the magnetic field from normal to the sample top surface. A major component of minimizing processing time was achieved, which could lead to using this technique in online and field testing problems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nondestructive Evaluation Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Hoole S. R. H. · 1988
2. Demenko A. · 2016
3. 10.1109/TMAG.2016.252134510.1109/TMAG.2016.2521345 ↗
4. 10.1109/TMAG.2011.217647110.1109/TMAG.2011.2176471 ↗
5. Jiang B. · 2012
6. 10.1109/20.12399610.1109/20.123996 ↗
7. 10.1109/20.4392310.1109/20.43923 ↗
8. 10.1177/147592170910216910.1177/1475921709102169 ↗
9. 10.1080/16864360.2014.90268510.1080/16864360.2014.902685 ↗
10. 10.1109/TMAG.2015.245019410.1109/TMAG.2015.2450194 ↗
11. 10.12989/sem.2017.61.6.80710.12989/sem.2017.61.6.807 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2017.03.00310.1016/j.enganabound.2017.03.003 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10409-016-0603-110.1007/s10409-016-0603-1 ↗
14. 10.3233/JAE-14006110.3233/JAE-140061 ↗
15. 10.1080/02564602.2014.98319210.1080/02564602.2014.983192 ↗
16. Karthik V. · 2013
17. Sivasuthan S. · Rev. Roum. Des Sci. Tech. Ser. Électrotech. Énergét. · 2015 · 60 · 241
18. Karthik V. U. · 2013
19. Karthik V. U. · 2015
20. Sivasuthan S. · 2014
21. S. Sivasuthan. Software Tool Methodology on a GPU for Finite Element Optimization. PhD Thesis, Michigan State University. East Lansing, Michigan, 2015.
22. V. Karthik. Shape optimization Using Finite Element Analysis in Eddy Current Testing and Electro-Thermal Coupled Problems. PhD Thesis, Michigan State University. East Lansing, Michigan, 2015.
23. Mathialakan T. · SAE Int. Journal. · 2015 · 8 · 450