ULTRASONIC DETECTION BY PHOTO-EMF SENSOR AND BY WIDEBAND AIR-COUPLED TRANSDUCER
Source abstract
Abstract
Two non-contact remote ultrasonic detection systems are compared. The first consists of a continuous wave (CW) Nd:YVO4 laser operating at 532 nm used in conjunction with a photo-induced electromotive-force (EMF) sensor. The second system employs an air-coupled capacitance transducer that has a bandwidth from 100 kHz up to 2 MHz. Both systems exhibit higher sensitivity to out-of-plane than in-plane measurements of stress wave signals. Ultrasound generation is carried out by an Nd:YAG pulsed laser at 532 nm in the thermoelastic regime in a 1.6 mm aluminum plate. A0 Lamb mode is generated at frequency-thickness product with strong out-of-plane displacements. Ultrasonic waveforms acquired are reported and the performance advantages of the two remote non-contact detectors are compared with each other. For lower frequency tests (up to 2 MHz), better results have been achieved with the air-coupled transducer that also has superior overall performance and benefits. The tests enabled direct comparison of air-coupled transducer and photo-EMF detector.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Photonic and Optical Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Scruby C. B. · 1990
2. 10.1063/1.32760110.1063/1.327601 ↗
3. Hutchins, D. A. 1988.Physical Acoustics, Edited by: Mason, W. P. and Thurston, R. N. 21–143. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-477918-1.50008-4 ↗
4. Monchalin J.-P. · IEEE Trans. UFFC · 1986 · 33 · 48510.1109/T-UFFC.1986.26860 ↗
5. 10.1088/0957-0233/10/11/20110.1088/0957-0233/10/11/201 ↗
6. Dunning G. J. · 1998
7. Stepanov, S. 2000.Handbook of Advanced Electronic and Photonic Materials and Devices, Edited by: Nalwa, H. S. 205Los Angeles: Stanford Scientific Corp.
8. Grandia, W. A. and Fortunko, C. M. 1995.Proc. IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium69710.1109/ULTSYM.1995.495667 ↗
9. 10.1016/0041-624X(96)00063-710.1016/0041-624X(96)00063-7 ↗
10. 10.1121/1.40982610.1121/1.409826 ↗
11. Schindel D. W. · IEEE Trans. UFFC · 1995 · 42 · 5110.1109/58.368313 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0041-624X(96)00103-510.1016/S0041-624X(96)00103-5 ↗
13. Cerniglia D. · 2002
14. Rose J. L. · 1999
15. 10.1109/PROC.1982.1233110.1109/PROC.1982.12331 ↗
16. Schindel D. W. · IEEE Trans. UFFC · 1995 · 42 · 4210.1109/58.368314 ↗