Microwave Detection of Stress-Induced Fatigue Cracks in Steel and Potential for Crack Opening Determination
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fatigue crack detection in metals is an important practical issue in many industries. In this paper the results of detecting fatigue cracks, using the dominant mode approach, employing flange-mounted, open-ended, rectangular waveguides at several microwave frequencies are presented. The goal of this investigation has been to demonstrate the capability of this approach for detecting stress-induced cracks under various static loads. In addition, a correlation between the features of the measured crack characteristic signals and crack opening has been sought. The results show that at all of the investigated frequencies, cracks from being nearly closed to having openings of up to 0.0508 mm are detected effectively. Furthermore, it is found that the interaction of the flange edge with a crack results in features that can be used to enhance crack detection robustness significantly (i.e., increased probability of detection). Several features associated with these measured crack characteristic signals are shown to correlate linearly with crack opening. Such simple correlations may then be used to estimate a crack opening closely after it has been detected using this approach. A complete discussion of the results is also provided in this paper.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques · Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Boving K. G. · 1989
2. 10.1520/STP27595S10.1520/STP27595S ↗
3. 10.1520/STP27596S10.1520/STP27596S ↗
4. Auld B. A. · 1978
5. Feinstein, L. and Hruby, R. J. 6th Symp. on Nondestructive Evaluation of Aerospace and Weapons Systems Components and Materials. San Antonio, TX
6. 10.1109/19.32889610.1109/19.328896 ↗
7. 10.1109/22.56662610.1109/22.566626 ↗
8. Yeh C. · Mater. Eval. · 1994 · 52 · 676
9. Yeh C. · Res. Nondestr. Eval. · 1994 · 6 · 3510.1080/09349849409409679 ↗
10. Zoughi, R., Ganchev, S., Huber, C., Ranu, E. and Runser, R. September 1995.Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)September, 187 Final (Fourth Quarterly) Report, Grant no. DTFH61–94-X-00023
11. 10.1080/1058975970895303210.1080/10589759708953032 ↗
12. Huber C. · Proc. Rev. Prog. Quant. NDE · 1995 · 14 · 637
13. 10.1109/22.64423410.1109/22.644234 ↗
14. Zoughi, R., Salem, R., Huber, C. and Abiri, H. 1995. ASNT Spring ′95 Conf. Paper Summaries. March20–241995, Las Vegas, NV. pp.46–48.
15. Yeh C. · Mater. Eval. · 1995 · 53 · 496
16. Qaddoumi, N., Ranu, E., Mirshahi, R., Stepanek, P., Otashevich, V., Huber, C. and Zoughi, R. January 1998.Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)January, 519 Final Report, Grant no. DTFH61–94-X-00023
17. Ganchev S. · Mater. Eval. · 1996 · 54 · 598