journal article·2019-10-11

Hot Electron Emission in Plasmonic Thermionic Converters

Shengxiang Wu, Nicki Hogan, Matthew Sheldon

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 4· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Thermionic converters generate electricity from thermal energy in a power cycle based on the vacuum emission of electrons. While thermodynamically efficient, practical implementations are limited by the extreme temperatures required for electron emission (>1500 K). Here we show how metal nanostructures that support resonant plasmonic absorption enable an alternative strategy. The high temperatures required for efficient vacuum emission can be maintained in a subpopulation of photoexcited “hot” electrons during steady-state optical illumination, whereas the lattice temperature of the metal remains within the range of thermal stability, below 600 K. We have also developed an optical thermometry technique based on anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy that confirms these unique electron dynamics. Thermionic devices constructed from optimized plasmonic absorbers show performance that can outcompete other strategies of concentrated solar power conversion in terms of efficiency and thermal stability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3255, United States

Department of Material Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3255, United States

Funding

Welch Foundation · Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2014.31110.1038/nnano.2014.311 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.120305610.1126/science.1203056 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b0034710.1021/acsphotonics.8b00347 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat315110.1038/nmat3151 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aat696710.1126/science.aat6967 ↗
6. 10.1021/nl303940z10.1021/nl303940z ↗
7. 10.1063/1.487004010.1063/1.4870040 ↗
8. 10.1515/nanoph-2016-000710.1515/nanoph-2016-0007 ↗
9. Hatsopoulos G. N. · 1973
10. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.02110.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.021 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat281410.1038/nmat2814 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.00110.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.001 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.203511310.1115/1.2035113 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn305194n10.1021/nn305194n ↗
15. 10.1007/s00216-011-5631-x10.1007/s00216-011-5631-x ↗
16. Edward I. · 1999
17. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0435910.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04359 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.496628910.1063/1.4966289 ↗
19. 10.1073/pnas.131147711110.1073/pnas.1311477111 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0242610.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02426 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0414510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04145 ↗
22. 10.1142/S021797921005536610.1142/S0217979210055366 ↗
23. 10.1117/12.67463610.1117/12.674636 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.07512010.1103/PhysRevB.94.075120 ↗
25. 10.1039/tf971670021610.1039/tf9716700216 ↗
26. Hatsopoulos G. N. · 1979
27. 10.1063/1.295371210.1063/1.2953712 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.03710.1016/j.rser.2013.06.037 ↗