journal article·1991-01

Thermographic Nondestructive Evaluation: Data Inversion Procedures Part II: 2-D Analysis and Experimental Results

J.-C. Krapez, X. Maldague, P. Cielo

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In Part I of this paper, a one-dimensional procedure was described for nondestructive thermographic evaluation. In Part II, a two-dimensional approach is presented to retrieve the subsurface defect depth, lateral size, and thermal resistance from the time-variable surface temperature distribution as recorded by a thermographic camera. The algorithm performance is tested on experimental data obtained under transient lateral-scanning surface heating conditions on a variety of artificial defects including bottom-open cavities of different geometries as well as TeflonTM implants in CFRP plates. In general, the defect depth and lateral size are inferred with satisfactory accuracy. The thermal resistance inferred through our inversion routine in the artificial delamination case was always higher than the incremental resistance due to the implants, suggesting the presence of resistive interfaces between the inclusions and the host material. Assuming a constant relative contrast error, the precision on the defect thermal resistance decreases as the defect resistance and depth/lateral size ratio increase.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Calibration and Measurement Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Vavilov V. P. · Research Techniques in NDT · 1982 · 5 · 239
2. 10.1364/AO.7.00171510.1364/AO.7.001715 ↗
3. 10.1364/AO.7.00173910.1364/AO.7.001739 ↗
4. McLaughlin P. V. · 1984
5. Milne J. M. · Proc. SPIE · 1985 · 590 · 29310.1117/12.951997 ↗
6. Tretout H. · Proc SPIE · 1985 · 590 · 27710.1117/12.951995 ↗
7. Cielo P. · Mater. Eval. · 1987 · 45 · 452
8. Busse G. · Physical Acoustics · 1988 · 18 · 40310.1016/B978-0-12-477918-1.50013-8 ↗
9. Burleigh D. D. · Proc. SPIE · 1989 · 1094 · 17510.1117/12.953400 ↗
10. 10.1117/12.2192210.1117/12.21922 ↗
11. Krapez J.-C. · Res. Nondestr. Eval. · 1991 · 3 · 8110.1080/09349849109409504 ↗
12. Vavilov V. P. · Sov. J. NDT (Defektoskopiya) · 1979 · 15 · 1005
13. 10.1115/1.324428210.1115/1.3244282 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.324442710.1115/1.3244427 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0056896610.1007/BF00568966 ↗
16. 10.1016/0017-9310(86)90033-510.1016/0017-9310(86)90033-5 ↗
17. Williams J. H. · Mater. Eval. · 1983 · 41 · 190
18. Baughn T. V. · Mater. Eval. · 1986 · 44 · 850
19. Budadin O. N. · Sov. J. NDT (Defektoskopiya) · 1984 · 20 · 635
20. Lamine, A. S., Maillet, D. and Degiovanni, A. Proc. 4th Eurotherm Conf. Edited by: Degiovanni, A. pp.101Nancy, France: Institut National Polytechnique.
21. Patankar S. V. · 1980
22. 10.1137/010300310.1137/0103003 ↗
23. De Boor C. · 197810.1007/978-1-4612-6333-3 ↗
24. Maldague X. · Can. Soc. NDT J. · 1987 · 8 · 44
25. Maldague X. · Can. Soc. NDT J. · 1989 · 10 · 28
26. Maldague X.
27. Krapez J.-C. · 1991
28. 10.2514/3.922910.2514/3.9229 ↗
29. 10.1139/p86-21210.1139/p86-212 ↗
30. Press W. H. · 1986