Joint Estimation of NDE Inspection Capability and Flaw-Size Distribution for In-Service Aircraft Inspections
Source abstract
Abstract
Nondestructive evaluation (NDE) is widely used in the aerospace industry during scheduled maintenance inspections to detect cracks or other anomalies in structural and rotating components. Life prediction and inspection interval decisions in aerospace applications require knowledge of the size distribution of unknown existing cracks and the probability of detecting a crack (POD), as a function of crack characteristics (e.g., crack length). The POD for a particular inspection method is usually estimated on the basis of laboratory experiments on a given specimen set. These experiments, however, cannot duplicate the conditions of in-service inspections. Quantifying the size distribution of unknown existing cracks is more difficult. If NDE signal strength is recorded at all inspections and if crack-length information is obtained after “crack find” inspections, it is possible to estimate the joint distribution of crack length, noise response and signal response. This joint distribution can then be used to estimate both the in service POD and the crack-length distribution at a given period of service time. In this paper, we present a statistical model and methodology to do this estimation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
a Department of Statistics and Center for Nondestructive Evaluation , Iowa State University , Ames , IA , USA
b Department of Mathematics , University of Dayton , Dayton , OH , USA
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. 2009
2. Li M. · Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation · 2011 · 30 · 1541
3. 10.1063/1.311417210.1063/1.3114172 ↗
4. 10.1080/00401706.1996.1048445110.1080/00401706.1996.10484451 ↗
5. 10.1080/00401706.1996.1048445410.1080/00401706.1996.10484454 ↗
6. C Annis . R package: mh1823, Version 2.5.4.2, http://www.statisticalengineering.com/. Last accessed March 2010 (2009).
7. 10.1063/1.311418110.1063/1.3114181 ↗
8. Davidian M. · 1995
9. Johnson R. A. · 2001
10. M. Li , N. Nakagawa , B. F. Larson , and W. Q. Meeker . (2011). Preprint available at: http://www.stat.iastate.edu/preprint/articles/2011-05.pdf (last accessed January, 2012).
11. Pawitan Y. · 200110.1093/oso/9780198507659.001.0001 ↗
12. Meeker W. Q. · 1998
13. OpenBUGS, Version 3.2.1. Available at: http://www.openbugs.info/.Last accessed May 2011.
14. 10.1023/A:100892952601110.1023/A:1008929526011 ↗
15. Gelman A. · 200310.1201/9780429258480 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.218474710.1063/1.2184747 ↗