journal article·2024-03-03

Utilizing an Ultrasonic Inspection System Operating Inside an Autoclave and Machine Learning to Quantify Porosity within Composites During Cure

Tyler B. Hudson, Gavin R. Chung, Joseph J. Pinakidis, Patrick J. Follis, Thammaia Sreekantamurthy, Frank L. Palmieri

Publisher page

Abstract

Composite materials are increasingly being utilized in aerospace applications for their high stiffness and strength to weight ratios and fatigue resistance. However, defects in the composite may arise during cure (e.g. porosity, delamination, fiber waviness), and current technology only allows for post-cure evaluation (e.g. microscopy, ultrasonic inspection). A high-temperature ultrasonic scanning system was developed for deployment in an autoclave, which can detect porosity in composites during the cure process. This study focused on the implementation of machine learning techniques to help generate a model that can quantify porosity, in addition to detection and localization that has previously been demonstrated. Two, six-hour-long experiments were conducted on curing of 762 mm × 305 mm (30 in. ×12 in.) composite panels with a [0/45/90/-45]4s layup and varying regions of high and low pressure due to its tapered geometry in contact with a flat caul plate. The first experiment utilized a thick (12.7 mm) caul plate and the second utilized a thin (3.2 mm) caul plate. During experimentation, within the scan area (406 mm × 13 mm), data was recorded and stored for ultrasonic amplitude. Additional variables were measured or predicted including temperature, autoclave pressure, number of plies, slope of the composite panel surface with respect to the transducer, viscosity, and glass transition temperature. The pre-processed data was entered into the Regression Learner Application in MATLABⓇ,Footnote1 and a rational quadratic Gaussian process regression (GPR) was chosen for the machine learning algorithm. The model was then trained on a larger data set to make it more robust and capable of predictions using a function callout. The result was a machine learning algorithm that can reliably quantify porosity in a composite panel during cure based on measured amplitude response and generate images for intuitive visualization. This tool can be further trained with more experimentation and potentially employed for real-time porosity detection and quantification of composite components during cure in an autoclave. Practical use of this technology is the potential to dynamically control processing parameters (e.g. autoclave pressure) in real-time to reduce the level of porosity within the laminate to acceptable limits (e.g. 2% by volume).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Advanced Materials and Processing Branch (AMPB), NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA

NASA Internships and Fellowships, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA

TEAMS3, Analytical Mechanics Associates (AMA), Hampton, Virginia, USA

Funding

Langley Research Center

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.11648/j.ajae.20180501.1210.11648/j.ajae.20180501.12 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.054 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00157-910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00157-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.02610.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.026 ↗
5. T. B. Hudson et al., SAMPE Conference Proceedings, Charlotte, NC, May 20-23, 2019. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200002665
6. T. B. Hudson et al., SAMPE neXus Conference Proceedings, Virtual Event, June 29-July 1, 2021. https://www.digitallibrarynasampe.org/data/pdfs/s2021_pdfs/TP21-0000000599.pdf
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10633710.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106337 ↗
8. 10.1038/srep0281010.1038/srep02810 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.eml.2017.10.00110.1016/j.eml.2017.10.001 ↗
10. 10.1038/srep2095210.1038/srep20952 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.08.08210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.08.082 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.07210.1016/j.renene.2012.08.072 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma609378310.3390/ma6093783 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.403923010.1115/1.4039230 ↗
15. 10.1177/002199831879351210.1177/0021998318793512 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.10595210.1016/j.ultras.2019.105952 ↗
17. 10.1177/0731684421105914510.1177/07316844211059145 ↗
18. 10.1177/0021998323116087410.1177/00219983231160874 ↗
19. 10.1117/12.265913610.1117/12.2659136 ↗
20. W. Hu and S. R. Nutt, 21st International Conference on Composite Materials Proceedings, Xi’an, China, August 20-25, 2017. https://www.iccm-central.org/Proceedings/ICCM21proceedings/papers/3224.pdf
21. 10.1080/20550340.2022.210634710.1080/20550340.2022.2106347 ↗
22. 10.1177/0021998323118817310.1177/00219983231188173 ↗
23. H. Bedayat et al., SAMPE Technical Conference Proceedings, Long Beach, CA, May 21-24, 2018. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200002529
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11538310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115383 ↗
25. 10.1109/IACC.2016.2510.1109/IACC.2016.25 ↗
26. 10.1098/rsos.16012510.1098/rsos.160125 ↗