journal article·2018-03-09Open access

Hydrogen Evolution with Minimal Parasitic Light Absorption by Dense Co–P Catalyst Films on Structured p-Si Photocathodes

Paul A. Kempler, Miguel A. Gonzalez, Kimberly M. Papadantonakis, Nathan S. Lewis

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 3· Issue 3

Abstract

Planar and three-dimensionally structured p-Si devices, consisting of an electrodeposited Co–P catalyst on arrays of Si microwires or Si micropyramids, were used as photocathodes for solar-driven hydrogen evolution in 0.50 M H2SO4(aq) to assess the effects of electrode structuring on parasitic absorption by the catalyst. Without the use of an emitter layer, p-Si/Co–P microwire arrays produced a photocurrent density of −10 mA cm–2 at potentials that were 130 mV more positive than those of optimized planar p-Si/Co–P devices. Champion p-Si/Co–P microwire array devices exhibited ideal regenerative cell solar-to-hydrogen efficiencies of >2.5% and were primarily limited by the photovoltage of the p-Si/Co–P junction. The vertical sidewalls of the Si microwire photoelectrodes thus minimized effects due to parasitic absorption at high loadings of catalyst for device structures with or without emitters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Blvd, Pasadena, California, United States

Funding

Office of Science

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2016.19410.1038/nnano.2016.194 ↗
2. 10.1039/C5EE02573G10.1039/C5EE02573G ↗
3. 10.1039/C6EE03563A10.1039/C6EE03563A ↗
4. 10.1021/ja00366a01610.1021/ja00366a016 ↗
5. 10.1021/ja00389a01010.1021/ja00389a010 ↗
6. 10.1039/C5EE00311C10.1039/C5EE00311C ↗
7. 10.1021/j100267a01010.1021/j100267a010 ↗
8. 10.1039/C6EE02215D10.1039/C6EE02215D ↗
9. 10.1039/C4EE03240C10.1039/C4EE03240C ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20150188410.1002/adma.201501884 ↗
11. 10.1021/ja510442p10.1021/ja510442p ↗
12. 10.1039/c2ee23192a10.1039/c2ee23192a ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20140264610.1002/anie.201402646 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20140822210.1002/anie.201408222 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp011861c10.1021/jp011861c ↗
16. 10.1039/C5CC02331A10.1039/C5CC02331A ↗
17. 10.1038/s41560-017-0068-x10.1038/s41560-017-0068-x ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0049510.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00495 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5EE01076D10.1039/C5EE01076D ↗
20. 10.1021/jp505445210.1021/jp5054452 ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.7b0760610.1021/jacs.7b07606 ↗
22. 10.1039/C4EE01753F10.1039/C4EE01753F ↗
23. McIntosh, K. R.; Baker-Finch, S. C. OPAL 2: Rapid Optical Simulation of Silicon Solar Cells. In 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2012; IEEE: 2012; pp 000265–000271.10.1109/PVSC.2012.6317616 ↗
24. 10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
25. 10.1039/C5EE00777A10.1039/C5EE00777A ↗
26. 10.1039/C6TA05725J10.1039/C6TA05725J ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20150175810.1002/aenm.201501758 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.190183510.1063/1.1901835 ↗
29. 10.1149/1.289871410.1149/1.2898714 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0037010.1021/acsphotonics.6b00370 ↗
31. 10.1039/C5EE00227C10.1039/C5EE00227C ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0178210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01782 ↗
33. 10.1039/c1ee01124c10.1039/c1ee01124c ↗