Acid-Scavenging Separators: A Novel Route for Improving Li-Ion Batteries’ Durability
Source abstract
Abstract
Autocatalytic decomposition of LiPF 6, with generation of HF and Lewis acids is the root cause for Li-ion battery (LIB) performance degradation. Acidic species promote various parasitic reactions, among which transition metal ions’ dissolution and the loss of electroactive as well as transport Li + have the most detrimental consequences for LIB performance. Herein we report on the performance improvements enabled by an acid-scavenging separator in cells with graphite negative and LiMn 2 O 4 or LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 positive electrodes. After 4 weeks of cycling at 55 °C, LiMn 2 O 4 ∥graphite and LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 ∥graphite cells with functional separators retain 100 and 43% more capacity, respectively, than cells with plain polypropylene separators. Furthermore, cells with functionalized separators have half of the interfacial impedances of cells with baseline separators, irrespective of positive electrode. The benefits afforded by acid-scavenging separators thus extend to broader classes of cell chemistries, beyond those affected mainly by manganese dissolution and loss of electroactive Li + ions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and BINA (BIU Institute for Nano-Technology and Advanced Materials), Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 590002, Israel
General Motors R&D Center, Warren, Michigan 48090-1203, United States
Funding
Council for Higher Education · Office of the Prime Minister of Israel
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/2.0081514jes10.1149/2.0081514jes ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.04910.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.049 ↗
3. 10.1021/cm901452z10.1021/cm901452z ↗
4. 10.1039/c0jm04225k10.1039/c0jm04225k ↗
5. 10.1021/jz101542210.1021/jz1015422 ↗
6. 10.1149/1.135315810.1149/1.1353158 ↗
7. 10.1149/1.221971010.1149/1.2219710 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00847-710.1016/S0013-4686(01)00847-7 ↗
9. 10.1149/1.183698110.1149/1.1836981 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02542-110.1016/S0378-7753(97)02542-1 ↗
11. 10.1016/0013-4686(96)00122-310.1016/0013-4686(96)00122-3 ↗
12. 10.1149/1.183787010.1149/1.1837870 ↗
13. 10.1149/1.139162510.1149/1.1391625 ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms343710.1038/ncomms3437 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp507833u10.1021/jp507833u ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms669310.1038/ncomms6693 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00209-110.1016/S0013-4686(99)00209-1 ↗
18. 10.1149/1.136514010.1149/1.1365140 ↗
19. 10.1016/0025-5408(83)90138-110.1016/0025-5408(83)90138-1 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.206937210.1149/1.2069372 ↗
21. 10.1016/0167-2738(94)90450-210.1016/0167-2738(94)90450-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.11.01510.1016/j.electacta.2005.11.015 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00479-710.1016/S0378-7753(01)00479-7 ↗
24. 10.1149/2.077212jes10.1149/2.077212jes ↗
25. 10.1149/2.0021508eel10.1149/2.0021508eel ↗
26. 10.1039/C5EE03360H10.1039/C5EE03360H ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.01910.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.019 ↗
28. 10.1149/2.0081607jes10.1149/2.0081607jes ↗
29. 10.1149/2.0451701jes10.1149/2.0451701jes ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.03610.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.036 ↗
31. 10.1002/aenm.20160155610.1002/aenm.201601556 ↗
32. 10.1149/1.183801610.1149/1.1838016 ↗
33. 10.1149/1.151677810.1149/1.1516778 ↗
34. 10.1149/1.354365110.1149/1.3543651 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.05.01210.1016/j.ssi.2012.05.012 ↗
36. Huheey J. E. · 2000
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.03.04510.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.03.045 ↗
38. 10.1039/C6TA06740A10.1039/C6TA06740A ↗