Determining and Minimizing Resistance for Ion Transport at the Polymer/Ceramic Electrolyte Interface
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, we report methods to quantify and minimize the interfacial resistance for Li ion transport, Rinterface, between a model polymer electrolyte, poly(ethylene oxide) + LiCF3SO3 (PE), and a model Li+-conducting ceramic electrolyte, LICGC from Ohara Corporation. By constructing a PE–ceramic–PE trilayer cell, we found Rinterface to be very large, 1.2 kΩ·cm2 at 30 °C, accounting for 66% of the total trilayer cell resistance. When dimethyl carbonate, a loose-binding solvent of Li+, was introduced into the trilayer, Rinterface decreased to essentially zero. As a result, a composite electrolyte with carbonate plasticizers wherein 40 vol % ceramic particles were dispersed in the polymer showed extraordinary room-temperature conductivity of approximately 10–4 S/cm, 3 orders of magnitude higher than that of the dry composite electrolyte. This discovery can be used as guidance in designing composite electrolytes to achieve synergistic effects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States
The Bredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20160892410.1002/anie.201608924 ↗
2. 10.1021/jacs.7b0636410.1021/jacs.7b06364 ↗
3. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3510.1038/nenergy.2017.35 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.152039411210.1073/pnas.1520394112 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.6b1630410.1021/acsami.6b16304 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.014 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1113610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11136 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ssi.2016.04.01410.1016/j.ssi.2016.04.014 ↗
9. 10.1039/C7TA10517G10.1039/C7TA10517G ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.11.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.11.020 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.006 ↗
12. 10.1149/1.362528110.1149/1.3625281 ↗
13. 10.1149/2.063212jes10.1149/2.063212jes ↗
14. 10.1149/2.0381712jes10.1149/2.0381712jes ↗
15. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00543-810.1016/S0378-7753(02)00543-8 ↗
16. Gray F. · 2011
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.02110.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.021 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.17810.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.178 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ssi.2007.04.00810.1016/j.ssi.2007.04.008 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00117-310.1016/S0167-2738(97)00117-3 ↗
21. 10.1038/2881810.1038/28818 ↗
22. 10.1016/0013-4686(92)87120-O10.1016/0013-4686(92)87120-O ↗
23. 10.1149/1.210856910.1149/1.2108569 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.262.5135.88310.1126/science.262.5135.883 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.204290710.1149/1.2042907 ↗
26. 10.1021/jp908623c10.1021/jp908623c ↗
27. 10.1021/ma00119a02210.1021/ma00119a022 ↗
28. 10.1021/ma951564410.1021/ma9515644 ↗
29. 10.1016/0167-2738(96)00041-010.1016/0167-2738(96)00041-0 ↗
30. 10.1039/a806278a10.1039/a806278a ↗
31. 10.1016/0378-7753(94)02066-C10.1016/0378-7753(94)02066-C ↗
32. 10.1016/0013-4686(95)00155-810.1016/0013-4686(95)00155-8 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0327710.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03277 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00731-X10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00731-X ↗
35. 10.1021/ja00325a01310.1021/ja00325a013 ↗
36. 10.1039/C5CP05121E10.1039/C5CP05121E ↗
37. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00676-410.1016/S0032-3861(98)00676-4 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cap.2013.12.01010.1016/j.cap.2013.12.010 ↗
39. 10.1039/C8ME00113H10.1039/C8ME00113H ↗