journal article·2025-11-14Open access

Two-Step Activations and Liquid Metal Fortified Copper Substrate on Corrosion Tolerance in Anode-Free Lithium–Sulfur Battery

Bereket Woldegbreal Taklu, Tsung-I Yeh, Chia-Yu Chang, Teklay Mezgebe Hagos, Yosef Nikodimos, Saravanan Ashok Vallal, Anna Windmüller, Chun-Chi Chang, Kassie Nigus Shitaw, Tripti Agnihotri, Rehbar Hasan, Zabish Bilew Muche, Yu-Chun Huang, Sheng-Chiang Yang, Wei-Nien Su, Bing Joe Hwang

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 10· Issue 11

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Capacity fading caused by polysulfide (PS) shuttling is a challenge in lithium–sulfur batteries. Anode-free lithium–sulfur batteries (AFLSBs) with zero excess Li are limited by dendrite and PS-induced reactions from soluble PS-shuttling, which affect cycle life. Here, the Cu current collector (Cu-CC) prone to PS-induced corrosion was studied using a liquid metal, GaIn, as a coating material. GaIn with self-healing properties fortifies uniform nucleation sites, alleviates dendrite growth, and overcomes the corrosion of Cu-CC. Operando confocal OM, in situ XRD, XPS, CV, and morphological-examinations revealed the mitigation of dendritic Li growth and alloy–dealloying mechanisms. The GaIn-Cu-CC under an asymmetric cell with a PS additive exhibits insignificant heat evolution and improved Li reversibility compared to Cu-CC, as revealed by operando heat evolution tests. Ex situ PS treatment resulted in severe corrosion in Cu-CC with substantial morphological alterations, and Cu 2 S formation was confirmed by XPS and synchrotronic XAS wavelet transform. The extent of in situ PS on AFLSB’s cell was studied under single-step activation (STA) and two-step activation (TSA) of the Li 2 S cathode. The STA-cathode delivers a capacity retention (CR) of 54.12% and 63.11% using Cu-CC and GaIn-Cu-CC, respectively, after 200 cycles. TSA of the cathode upon GaIn-Cu-CC leads to a 50.11% CR after 250 cycles. The adverse effect of PS on Cu-CC resulted in 33.15% CR after 100 cycles. Formulating a corrosion-tolerant and uniform nucleation site from a coating material in a facile approach enhances the feasibility of Cu-CC in sulfur-rich environments, making capable AFLSBs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nano-electrochemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering

National Taiwan University of Science and Technology

Sustainable Electrochemical Energy Development Center

Institute of Energy Technologies − Fundamental Electrochemistry (IET-1)

Forschungszentrum Jülich

Nano-electrochemistry Laboratory, Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology

National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC)

Funding

National Science and Technology Council · Ministry of Education, Taiwan

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c0052810.1021/acs.accounts.1c00528 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0011510.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10654210.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106542 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20200080410.1002/aenm.202000804 ↗
5. 10.1002/ente.20200034810.1002/ente.202000348 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15792010.1016/j.cej.2024.157920 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.3c1755910.1021/acsami.3c17559 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23142510.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231425 ↗
9. 10.1149/MA2024-027790mtgabs10.1149/MA2024-027790mtgabs ↗
10. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.02010.1016/j.joule.2020.03.020 ↗
11. 10.1002/batt.20220005910.1002/batt.202200059 ↗
12. 10.1002/batt.20200019010.1002/batt.202000190 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.14954710.1016/j.cej.2024.149547 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jtice.2021.09.00810.1016/j.jtice.2021.09.008 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20230456810.1002/adfm.202304568 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.09.01710.1016/j.ensm.2018.09.017 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.00910.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.009 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0062210.1021/acsenergylett.3c00622 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20241804310.1002/adfm.202418043 ↗
20. 10.1039/D3TA07839F10.1039/D3TA07839F ↗
21. 10.1039/C8TA10341K10.1039/C8TA10341K ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20190085810.1002/aenm.201900858 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.est.2022.10595510.1016/j.est.2022.105955 ↗
24. 10.1039/D1CC00006C10.1039/D1CC00006C ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mtener.2022.10117910.1016/j.mtener.2022.101179 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41560-019-0428-910.1038/s41560-019-0428-9 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14406210.1016/j.cej.2023.144062 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10080210.1016/j.apmt.2020.100802 ↗
29. 10.20517/energymater.2023.9010.20517/energymater.2023.90 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.5c0585710.1021/acsami.5c05857 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20210942610.1002/adma.202109426 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10847110.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108471 ↗
33. 10.1002/celc.20190006610.1002/celc.201900066 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20241804310.1002/adfm.202418043 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.4c0372910.1021/acsami.4c03729 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.10455210.1016/j.ensm.2025.104552 ↗
37. 10.1149/MA2025-013324mtgabs10.1149/MA2025-013324mtgabs ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.10410310.1016/j.ensm.2025.104103 ↗
39. 10.1149/1945-7111/adfab810.1149/1945-7111/adfab8 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.mtener.2023.10132710.1016/j.mtener.2023.101327 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.03310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.033 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16651710.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166517 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.esci.2022.10008710.1016/j.esci.2022.100087 ↗
44. 10.1002/batt.20180014910.1002/batt.201800149 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0064010.1021/acsnano.3c00640 ↗
46. 10.1039/D2CS00606E10.1039/D2CS00606E ↗
47. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.10172910.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101729 ↗
48. 10.1002/smtd.20250020710.1002/smtd.202500207 ↗