Carbonate/Hydroxide Separation Boosts CO2 Absorption Rate and Electrochemical Release Efficiency
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrochemical CO 2 capture systems using hydroxide solutions face stiff performance trade-offs, as the hydroxide ions necessary for rapid CO 2 absorption reduce the current efficiency of subsequent electrochemical CO 2 release. In this work, we propose a carbonate/hydroxide separation step between CO 2 absorption and release to provide a concentrated carbonate stream for efficient electrochemical release and a separate hydroxide stream for rapid absorption. We combine experiments on CO 2 absorption, nanofiltration separation, and electrochemical release to build a comprehensive model that illustrates system performance trade-offs. We find that employing commercial nanofiltration membranes for separation increases the electrochemical current efficiency by as much as six-fold without sacrificing absorption rate. In the case of Direct Air Capture, the nanofiltration approach reduces costs by 20-30% and significantly increases the operational flexibility of the system. Such carbonate/hydroxide separations may also find use in other systems such as point source capture and integrated CO 2 capture and conversion to valuable products.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
Funding
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program · Shell Exploration and Production Company
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. IEA. Net Zero by 2050; 2021.
2. United Nations Environment Programme. Emissions Gap Report 2023: Broken Record – Temperatures Hit New Highs, yet World Fails to Cut Emissions (Again); United Nations Environment Programme, 2023. 10.59117/20.500.11822/43922.10.59117/20.500.11822/43922 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.eti.2022.10299110.1016/j.eti.2022.102991 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.10179110.1016/j.xcrp.2024.101791 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.00610.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 ↗
6. 10.1088/2516-1083/abf1ce10.1088/2516-1083/abf1ce ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0088910.1021/acs.iecr.2c00889 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0564110.1021/acs.iecr.9b05641 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0080710.1021/acsenergylett.4c00807 ↗
10. 10.1021/ie502128x10.1021/ie502128x ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b0258610.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02586 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41560-024-01654-z10.1038/s41560-024-01654-z ↗
13. 10.1016/j.device.2024.10050610.1016/j.device.2024.100506 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0039610.1021/acsenergylett.2c00396 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0197710.1021/acs.est.0c01977 ↗
16. 10.1039/C0EE00303D10.1039/C0EE00303D ↗
17. 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.01610.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.016 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-020-18232-y10.1038/s41467-020-18232-y ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c0043010.1021/acs.accounts.3c00430 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-022-29791-710.1038/s41467-022-29791-7 ↗
21. 10.1039/D2EE03804H10.1039/D2EE03804H ↗
22. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.05.00310.1016/j.joule.2023.05.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.joule.2024.10.01010.1016/j.joule.2024.10.010 ↗
24. 10.1021/es702607w10.1021/es702607w ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.10.02710.1016/j.ijggc.2013.10.027 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0285210.1021/acsenergylett.4c02852 ↗
27. 10.1002/cssc.20170233010.1002/cssc.201702330 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.05310.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.053 ↗
29. Kim, Y.; Electrochemical capture and conversion of CO2 into syngas. ChemRxiv 2023. 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-hvjxn.10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-hvjxn ↗
30. 10.1038/s41560-023-01347-z10.1038/s41560-023-01347-z ↗
31. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0097510.1021/acsenergylett.9b00975 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.04310.1016/j.desal.2014.10.043 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.07.02610.1016/j.jwpe.2017.07.026 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11705-021-2103-510.1007/s11705-021-2103-5 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.04510.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.045 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.00810.1016/j.watres.2003.11.008 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.02010.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.020 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsestengg.4c0015010.1021/acsestengg.4c00150 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.04010.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.040 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0260-8774(98)00121-610.1016/S0260-8774(98)00121-6 ↗
41. 10.1016/0011-9164(89)85026-X10.1016/0011-9164(89)85026-X ↗
42. 10.1126/science.aab053010.1126/science.aab0530 ↗
43. Lazard LCOE+ Levelized Cost of Energy+, 2024.
44. Hubert, M. DOE Hydrogen Program Record #24005, 2024.
45. Turton R. · 2009
46. 10.1016/0021-9614(82)90085-410.1016/0021-9614(82)90085-4 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0169310.1021/acsenergylett.1c01693 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00172-610.1016/S0011-9164(98)00172-6 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41467-022-33145-810.1038/s41467-022-33145-8 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0089810.1021/acsenergylett.0c00898 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.03510.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.035 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.01.03010.1016/j.seppur.2008.01.030 ↗