DataVXCellulose Chemistry and TechnologyPaper
journal article·2023-09-29Open access

EFFECT OF NATURAL DYES AND DIFFERENT MORDANT TREATMENTS ON ULTRA-VIOLET PROTECTION PROPERTY OF COTTON FABRIC

Department of Textile and Apparel Design, I. C. College of Home Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India, MONA VERMA, DIVYA DOGRA, Department of Textile and Apparel Design, I. C. College of Home Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India, SAROJ YADAV, Department of Textile and Apparel Design, I. C. College of Home Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India, J. P. SINGH, Department of Textile Technology, UPTTI Kanpur, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 57· Issue 7-8
Publisher pageOpen full text
Source abstract

Abstract

Natural dyes are eco-friendly, skin-friendly, have pleasing colours and other beneficial characteristics, such as UV protection property. In the present work, different natural dyes (onion skin, henna leaves, curry leaves, neem leaves and turmeric), along with a number of mordants (myrobalan, alum, ferrous sulphate and ferrous sulhate-myrobalan), were used to study their effects on colour strength and the ultraviolet protection factor (UPF) values of treated dyed cotton fabric. It was found that the highest colour strength (K/S) was achieved on ferrous sulphate-myrobalan treated turmeric dyed cotton fabric (75.45), followed by the samples dyed with onion skin (48.24), henna leaves (37.40), neem leaves (28.61) and curry leaves (25.96). The highest UPF value was found for ferrous sulphate-myrobalan pretreated curry leaves dyed cotton fabric (27.69), which indicated very good protection, whereas the ferrous sulphate-myrobalan pretreated onion skin dyed cotton fabric showed good protection (23.39), followed by those dyed with henna leaves (21.79), turmeric (19.48), and neem leaves (16.43).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Skin Protection and Aging · Synthesis of Organic Compounds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 M. Pailthorpe, Mutation Res., 422, 175 (1998), https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271040/1-s2.0-S0027510700X00504/1-s2.0-S0027510798001900/main.pdf
2. 2 D. R. Gies, E. Kambe, T. S. Josephs, W. G. Bagnuolo, Y. J. Choi et al., Astrophys. J., 525, 420 (1998), https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/30787210.1086/307872 ↗
3. 3 R. I. Ferrini, M. Perlam and L. Hill, Am. J. Prev. Med., 14, 83 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797 (97)00006-810.1016/S0749-3797(97)00006-8 ↗
4. 4 R. Hilfiker, W. Kaufmann, G. Reinert and E. Schmdt, Text. Res. J., 66, 61 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175960660020110.1177/004051759606600201 ↗
5. 5 P. C. Crews, S. Kachman and A. G. Beyer, Text. Chem. Color., 31, 1 (1999), http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/aut-2015-002110.1515/aut-2015-0021 ↗
6. 6 A. K. Sarkar, in "Textiles for Protection", edited by R. A. Scott, Woodhead Publishing Ltd., 2005, pp. 392-394
7. 7 G. Reinert, F. Fuso, R. Hilfiker and E. Schmidt, Text. Chem. Color., 29, 36 (1997)
8. 8 D. Pargaia, M. Gahlot and A. Rani, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 41, 418 (2016)
9. 9 E. Lichtfouse, in "Environmental Chemistry, Green Chemistry and Pollutants in Ecosystem", edited by J. Schwarzbauer and D. Robert, Cal Recovery, Inc., 2005, pp. 1-780, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26531-710.1007/b137751 ↗
10. 10 D. Grifoni, L. Bacci, G. Zipoli, A. Albanese and F. Sabatini, Dyes Pigment., 91, 279 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.04.00610.1016/j.dyepig.2011.04.006 ↗
11. 11 R. Mongkholrattanasit, J. Krystufek, J. Wiener and M. Vikova, Fibres Text. East. Eur., 19, 94 (2011)
12. 12 M. Verma, N. Gahlot, S. S. J. Singh and N. M. Rose, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 343 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.3310.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.33 ↗
13. 13 R. Bhuvaneswari and K. Sujitha, Int. J. Sci. Dev. Res., 4, 574 (2019), https://www.ijsdr.org/papers/IJSDR1903101.pdf
14. 14 A. M. K. Bahrum, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 3, 1 (2012)
15. 15 P. S. Vankar, Resonance, 35, 73 (2000), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0283684410.1007/BF02836844 ↗
16. 16 A. Zubairu and Y. M. Mshelia, Sci. Technol., 5, 26 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.scit.20150502.02
17. 17 S. Tepparin, P. Sae-Be, J. Suesat, S. Chumrum and W. Hongmeng, Int. J. Biosci. Biochem. Bioinforma., 2, 1 (2012), http://www.ijbbb.org/papers/92-CB212.pdf
18. 18 R. Kanchana, A. Fernandes, B. Bhat, S. Budkule, S. Dessai et al., Int. J. Chemtech. Res. 5, 2102 (2013), https://sphinxsai.com/2013/JulySept13/chPDF/CT=06(2102-2109)JS13.pdf
19. 19 S. M. Gawish, H. M. Mashaly, H. M. Helmy, A. M. Ramadan and R. Farouk, J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol., 8, 421 (2017), https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7439.100042110.4172/2157-7439.1000421 ↗
20. 20 P. Saravanan, G. Chandramohan, J. Mariajancyrani and P. Shanmugasundaram, Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci., 2, 1 (2013), http://www.isca.me/IJENS/Archive/v2/i12/1.ISCA-IRJEvS-2013-221.pdf
21. 21 D. Das, D. B. Datta and P. Bhattacharya, Int. J. Recent Res. Phys. Chem. Sci., 1, 13 (2015)
22. 22 K. M. Jadav and K. N. Ninge Gowda, Int. J. Recent Sci. Res., 8, 18207 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.24327/ijrsr.2017.0807.0469
23. 23 L. Zhou, J. Z. Shao, L. Q. Chai and G. D. Fu, Adv. Mater. Res., 441, 111 (2012)10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.441.111 ↗
24. 24 O. R. Devi, S. Bains and S. Grewal, Int. J. Chem. Stud., 8, 18 (2020), http://dx.doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4a.981110.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4a.9811 ↗
25. 25 S. D. Bhattacharya and A. K. Shah, Color. Technol., 116, 1 (2000), http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.2000.tb00002.x10.1111/j.1478-4408.2000.tb00002.x ↗
26. 26 I. Hussein and Y. Elhassaneen, Am. J. Sci., 9, 16 (2013), https://www.jofamericanscience.org/journals/am-sci/am0908/003_19448am0908_16_24.pdf10.1038/scientificamericanmind0513-16 ↗
27. "