Enabling “Sodium–Metal-Free” Manufacturing of Solid-State Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
The Na–metal-free manufacturing approach can improve both the manufacturing and performance of Na metal solid-state batteries. While significant research has been dedicated to Li–metal-free manufacturing, the exploration of Na-based counterparts remains relatively nascent. Similar to Li–metal-free manufacturing, achieving uniform Na deposition remains a challenge when using a solid-state electrolyte. In this work, we demonstrated the ability to plate a uniform 2.0 mAh cm –2 Na metal anode by the simple placement of an Al foil-based current collector on NASICON solid-state electrolyte. The Na anode uniformity was dramatically improved by functionalizing the Al CC with a ∼96 nm thick layer of Au. It was shown that the in situ plated Na is homogeneous and dense and can be reversibly stripped and plated at a Coulombic efficiency of >90%. Our findings advance the understanding of Na nucleation and growth and offer insights into streamlining manufacturing processes for future all-solid-state Na anodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Extraction and Separation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
Funding
University of Michigan · Kwanjeong Educational Foundation · Basic Energy Sciences
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.eng.2021.08.03210.1016/j.eng.2021.08.032 ↗
2. 10.1002/celc.20200016410.1002/celc.202000164 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41560-023-01208-910.1038/s41560-023-01208-9 ↗
4. 10.1039/D3EE03141A10.1039/D3EE03141A ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0064210.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00642 ↗
6. 10.1002/tcr.20220011210.1002/tcr.202200112 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.07.02010.1016/j.matt.2022.07.020 ↗
8. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac163d10.1149/1945-7111/ac163d ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20230272910.1002/aenm.202302729 ↗
10. 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-tkcd910.26434/chemrxiv-2023-tkcd9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.01710.1016/j.joule.2019.06.017 ↗
12. 10.1149/1945-7111/accab410.1149/1945-7111/accab4 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.07.02210.1016/j.joule.2023.07.022 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20230226110.1002/aenm.202302261 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-020-19004-410.1038/s41467-020-19004-4 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.09.00910.1016/j.joule.2022.09.009 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗
18. 10.1126/science.abg721710.1126/science.abg7217 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-021-25848-110.1038/s41467-021-25848-1 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0235610.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02356 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.17510.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.175 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.2c0198010.1021/acsami.2c01980 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20220271210.1002/aenm.202202712 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.12310.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.123 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22932110.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229321 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0517410.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05174 ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20230238310.1002/aenm.202302383 ↗
28. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.1010.1038/nenergy.2016.10 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0174010.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01740 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41563-019-0438-910.1038/s41563-019-0438-9 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.9b0253710.1021/acsami.9b02537 ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20210381910.1002/smll.202103819 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.03910.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.039 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20180749510.1002/adma.201807495 ↗
35. 10.1038/s43246-021-00177-410.1038/s43246-021-00177-4 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20220418610.1002/aenm.202204186 ↗
37. 10.1039/D3FD00079F10.1039/D3FD00079F ↗