The Effect of Alloying Interlayers on Lithium Anode Morphology and Microstructure in “Anode-Free” Solid-State Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
“Lithium–metal-free” manufacturing of solid-state battery cells could simplify cell assembly and increase the energy density. However, the performance of these cells benefits from a more homogeneous anode formation. The use of thin alloying interlayers in “lithium–metal-free” cells can improve cycle life, but their influence on the morphology and microstructure of plated lithium is yet unknown. Gold and silver interlayers allow for lithium plating at higher current density (0.25 mA cm –2 ) without short-circuiting compared to cells without interlayers. The lithium homogeneity is substantially improved, as shown by optical microscopy and 3D profiling. In addition, electron backscatter diffraction determined that the grain size and grain boundary orientation can be controlled by changing the lithium layer composition in the case of silver or by introducing inert particles when using gold interlayers. These findings further the understanding of how thin alloying interlayers can substantially alter the cycling performance of lithium in “lithium–metal-free” solid-state batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
University of Michigan
MUSIC DOE Energy Frontier Research Center
Institute of Physical Chemistry and Center for Materials Research (ZfM)
Justus Liebig University
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Materials Department
University of California Santa Barbara
Funding
Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung · Center for Mechano-Chemical Understanding of Solid Ion Conductors
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
2. 10.1557/s43577-024-00740-710.1557/s43577-024-00740-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.04.00110.1016/j.joule.2021.04.001 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0248110.1021/acsaem.1c02481 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20210660810.1002/adfm.202106608 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-020-19004-410.1038/s41467-020-19004-4 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20220418610.1002/aenm.202204186 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-023-36401-710.1038/s41467-023-36401-7 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20220676210.1002/adma.202206762 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.07.02210.1016/j.joule.2023.07.022 ↗
12. 10.1126/sciadv.add051010.1126/sciadv.add0510 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.09.00910.1016/j.joule.2022.09.009 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20221106710.1002/adfm.202211067 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20240497510.1002/aenm.202404975 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41563-024-02006-810.1038/s41563-024-02006-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mtener.2022.10118310.1016/j.mtener.2022.101183 ↗
18. 10.1073/pnas.161573311410.1073/pnas.1615733114 ↗
19. 10.1039/D3TA03814A10.1039/D3TA03814A ↗
20. 10.1039/D3FD00079F10.1039/D3FD00079F ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20230357110.1002/aenm.202303571 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.03410.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.034 ↗
23. 10.1002/admi.20220235410.1002/admi.202202354 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.07.02010.1016/j.matt.2022.07.020 ↗
25. 10.1149/1945-7111/accab410.1149/1945-7111/accab4 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.01310.1016/j.joule.2019.06.013 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c0190310.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01903 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10339810.1016/j.ensm.2024.103398 ↗
29. 10.5796/electrochemistry.82.36410.5796/electrochemistry.82.364 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20230272910.1002/aenm.202302729 ↗
31. 10.1002/aenm.20230296010.1002/aenm.202302960 ↗
32. Callister W. D. · 1991
33. 10.1007/BF0286899410.1007/BF02868994 ↗
34. 10.1007/BF0286899310.1007/BF02868993 ↗
35. 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90086-510.1016/0001-6160(84)90086-5 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.9b0253710.1021/acsami.9b02537 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0043110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00431 ↗