Advanced Impedance Analysis for Performance Degradation during Low-Temperature CO2 Electroreduction
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a powerful tool commonly used to study electrochemical systems. Nevertheless, its application in CO 2 electroreduction has been so far limited due to its complex reaction mechanism and environment. Although initial findings have demonstrated the viability of applying EIS analysis in CO 2 electrolyzers, the assignment of individual processes in the impedance spectra remains ambiguous. Therefore, a more detailed investigation, especially focused on its application in evaluating degradation mechanisms, is essential. In this study, a stable gas diffusion electrode (GDE) system was developed for a comprehensive EIS and distribution of relaxation time (DRT) evaluation to assess key degradation mechanisms under accelerated stress conditions such as high current density and low operating temperature. Validated by post-mortem analysis and complementary methods, we demonstrate the viability of this approach for operando monitoring of CO 2 electroreduction by assigning individual mechanistic processes in the GDE and linking them to performance degradation over time.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, German Aerospace Center, Pfaffenwaldring 38-40, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Institute of Building Energetics, Thermal Engineering and Energy Storage, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Funding
Bundesministerium f?r Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41560-021-00973-910.1038/s41560-021-00973-9 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20230628810.1002/adma.202306288 ↗
3. 10.1002/cssc.20190254710.1002/cssc.201902547 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0245610.1021/acsenergylett.9b02456 ↗
5. 10.1039/D0TA08695A10.1039/D0TA08695A ↗
6. 10.1038/s41929-018-0182-610.1038/s41929-018-0182-6 ↗
7. 10.20517/energymater.2023.8810.20517/energymater.2023.88 ↗
8. 10.1002/sus2.16710.1002/sus2.167 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.esci.2024.10026710.1016/j.esci.2024.100267 ↗
10. 10.1002/smtd.20170034210.1002/smtd.201700342 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13676410.1016/j.electacta.2020.136764 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0095110.1021/acsenergylett.4c00951 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c0202410.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02024 ↗
14. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0762510.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07625 ↗
15. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0445110.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04451 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.03.05010.1016/j.jechem.2021.03.050 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.139404910.1149/1.1394049 ↗
18. 10.1016/0013-4686(89)87010-010.1016/0013-4686(89)87010-0 ↗
19. 10.1039/D0TA06466A10.1039/D0TA06466A ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14648610.1016/j.cej.2023.146486 ↗
21. 10.1002/elsa.20210015810.1002/elsa.202100158 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0022-0728(84)80324-110.1016/S0022-0728(84)80324-1 ↗
23. 10.1002/cite.20200019210.1002/cite.202000192 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRev.17.27310.1103/PhysRev.17.273 ↗
25. 10.1021/je970084010.1021/je9700840 ↗
26. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0019910.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00199 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b0017710.1021/acs.cgd.8b00177 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.00410.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.004 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11764010.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117640 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.08610.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.086 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.14349210.1016/j.electacta.2023.143492 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0510410.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05104 ↗
33. Vanysek P. · CRC Hand Book of Chemistry and Physics · 1993 · 5
34. Barsoukov E. · 201810.1002/9781119381860 ↗
35. 10.1002/9780470381588.ch1810.1002/9780470381588.ch18 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.00710.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.007 ↗